Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 83.59 (2025)

Right of action for possession.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
83.59 Right of action for possession.
(1) If the rental agreement is terminated and the tenant does not vacate the premises, the landlord may recover possession of the dwelling unit as provided in this section.
(2) A landlord, the landlord’s attorney, or the landlord’s agent, applying for the removal of a tenant, shall file in the county court of the county where the premises are situated a complaint describing the dwelling unit and stating the facts that authorize its recovery. A landlord’s agent is not permitted to take any action other than the initial filing of the complaint, unless the landlord’s agent is an attorney. The landlord is entitled to the summary procedure provided in s. 51.011, and the court shall advance the cause on the calendar.
(3) The landlord shall not recover possession of a dwelling unit except:
(a) In an action for possession under subsection (2) or other civil action in which the issue of right of possession is determined;
(b) When the tenant has surrendered possession of the dwelling unit to the landlord;
(c) When the tenant has abandoned the dwelling unit. In the absence of actual knowledge of abandonment, it shall be presumed that the tenant has abandoned the dwelling unit if he or she is absent from the premises for a period of time equal to one-half the time for periodic rental payments. However, this presumption does not apply if the rent is current or the tenant has notified the landlord, in writing, of an intended absence; or
(d) When the last remaining tenant of a dwelling unit is deceased, personal property remains on the premises, rent is unpaid, at least 60 days have elapsed following the date of death, and the landlord has not been notified in writing of the existence of a probate estate or of the name and address of a personal representative. This paragraph does not apply to a dwelling unit used in connection with a federally administered or regulated housing program, including programs under s. 202, s. 221(d)(3) and (4), s. 236, or s. 8 of the National Housing Act, as amended.
(4) The prevailing party is entitled to have judgment for costs and execution therefor.
History.s. 2, ch. 73-330; s. 1, ch. 74-146; s. 24, ch. 82-66; s. 1, ch. 92-36; s. 447, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 2007-136; s. 11, ch. 2013-136.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case: Hous. Opportunities Proj. for Excellence, Inc. v. Spv Realty, Lc, 212 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).
Hous. Opportunities Proj. for Excellence, Inc. v. Spv Realty, Lc, 212 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). · cites it 4× “, and § 83.59(2), Fla. Stat. (2016). There is neither logic nor a textual basis for imposing this burdensome, time- consuming requirement on victims of housing discrimination under state law when no such burden exists under the federal law that has been, and remains, the…”
Toledo v. Escamilla, 962 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). · cites it 2× “Specifically, section 83.59(2), Florida Statutes (2004), provides in part: A landlord .”
Mesnikoff v. Fq Backyard Trading, LLC, 239 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). · cites it 2× “Even if Backyard Trading did attempt to include in its complaint a second count for possession under section 83.59(1) of the Act, which it did not, we would nonetheless conclude that the county court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter a final judgment for eviction and…”
Springbrook Commons, Ltd. v. Brown, 761 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · cites it 2× “We reject the landlord's argument that section 83.59(4), Florida Statutes (1999), which provides that the prevailing party in an action for possession is entitled to costs, compels a different result.”
Lane v. Brith, 313 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). · cites it 4× “Apparently the action was brought under the provisions of § 83.59, F.S. 1973, for failure to vacate the premises after termination of the rental agreement.”
Hoffman v. Ouellette, 798 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). · cites it 2× “Section 83.59 of the Quebec Automobile Insurance Act provides: Accident outside Quebec.”
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Dansey, 39 Fla. Supp. 2d 216 (Fla. Cty. Ct. 1990). · cites it 2× “ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS THIS CAUSE is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss, and the court having held a hearing on January 25, 1990 and being fully advised in the premises hereby rules as follows: *217 This is an action for possession of a dwelling…”
Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion—Nonlawyer Preparation of & Representation of Landlord in Uncontested Residential Evictions, 605 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 1992). · cites it 2× “After the advisory opinion was filed and comments were received, the Standing Committee filed as supplemental authority a recent amendment to section 83.59(2), Florida Statutes (1991), that purports to authorize a residential landlord’s "attorney or agent” to file the initial…”
The Florida Bar v. Mickens, 505 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1987). “Because Part II does not reference the provision in Part I for filing eviction or distress of rent actions and only addresses actions filed by the landlord, § 83.59(2), Florida Statutes, may be construed as excluding non-attorney agents from filing on behalf of a residential…”
Lawson v. Alverez, 46 Fla. Supp. 2d 94 (Fla. Manatee Cty. Ct. 1990). · cites it 3× “ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Court having held a hearing on December 13, 1990, and being fully advised in the premises hereby rules as follows: This is an action for possession of a dwelling…”
William Hefley & Aimee J. Hefley v. Christopher Holmquist (Fla. 5th DCA 2025). · cites it 4× “See §§ 83.59, 83.62(1), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ.”
Yolani Castillo v. Radames Antonio Camacho Aldahondo (Fla. 6th DCA 2025). · cites it 4× “As pleaded by Camacho in the eviction action, section 83.59, Florida Statutes (2022), authorizes the county court to grant possession of a dwelling to a landlord when the tenant does not vacate the dwelling upon termination of the rental agreement.”
— 83.59(1) — 5 cases
Mesnikoff v. Fq Backyard Trading, LLC, 239 So. 3d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018). “Even if Backyard Trading did attempt to include in its complaint a second count for possession under section 83.59(1) of the Act, which it did not, we would nonetheless conclude that the county court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter a final judgment for eviction and…”
Lawson v. Alverez, 46 Fla. Supp. 2d 94 (Fla. Manatee Cty. Ct. 1990). “ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and the Court having held a hearing on December 13, 1990, and being fully advised in the premises hereby rules as follows: This is an action for possession of a dwelling…”
Labrada v. Barrios, 44 Fla. Supp. 2d 140 (Fla. Miami-Dade Cty. Ct. 1990).
Lawson v. Alverez, 47 Fla. Supp. 2d 160 (Fla. Manatee Cty. Ct. 1990).
— 83.59(2) — 9 cases
Hous. Opportunities Proj. for Excellence, Inc. v. Spv Realty, Lc, 212 So. 3d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). “, and § 83.59(2), Fla. Stat. (2016). There is neither logic nor a textual basis for imposing this burdensome, time- consuming requirement on victims of housing discrimination under state law when no such burden exists under the federal law that has been, and remains, the…”
Toledo v. Escamilla, 962 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). “Specifically, section 83.59(2), Florida Statutes (2004), provides in part: A landlord .”
Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion—Nonlawyer Preparation of & Representation of Landlord in Uncontested Residential Evictions, 605 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 1992). “After the advisory opinion was filed and comments were received, the Standing Committee filed as supplemental authority a recent amendment to section 83.59(2), Florida Statutes (1991), that purports to authorize a residential landlord’s "attorney or agent” to file the initial…”
Lane v. Brith, 313 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). “Apparently the action was brought under the provisions of § 83.59, F.S. 1973, for failure to vacate the premises after termination of the rental agreement.”
The Florida Bar v. Mickens, 505 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. 1987). “Because Part II does not reference the provision in Part I for filing eviction or distress of rent actions and only addresses actions filed by the landlord, § 83.59(2), Florida Statutes, may be construed as excluding non-attorney agents from filing on behalf of a residential…”
— 83.59(3) — 2 cases
William Hefley & Aimee J. Hefley v. Christopher Holmquist (Fla. 5th DCA 2025). “See §§ 83.59, 83.62(1), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ.”
Beaty v. Kimerling Corp., 47 Fla. Supp. 103 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Miami-Dade Cty. 1978).
— 83.59(3)(c) — 2 cases
William Hefley & Aimee J. Hefley v. Christopher Holmquist (Fla. 5th DCA 2025). “See §§ 83.59, 83.62(1), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ.”
Colony II Assocs., Ltd. v. Crocki, 37 Fla. Supp. 2d 138 (Fla. Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1989).
— 83.59(4) — 1 case
Springbrook Commons, Ltd. v. Brown, 761 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). “We reject the landlord's argument that section 83.59(4), Florida Statutes (1999), which provides that the prevailing party in an action for possession is entitled to costs, compels a different result.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

This Florida statute resource is curated by the lawyer who curates this resource, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.