Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 88.2011 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 88.2011 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 88.2011

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 88
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 88.2011
88.2011 Bases for jurisdiction over nonresident.
(1) In a proceeding to establish or enforce a support order or to determine parentage of a child, a tribunal of this state may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident individual or the individual’s guardian or conservator if:
(a) The individual is personally served with citation, summons, or notice within this state;
(b) The individual submits to the jurisdiction of this state by consent in a record, by entering a general appearance, or by filing a responsive document having the effect of waiving any contest to personal jurisdiction;
(c) The individual resided with the child in this state;
(d) The individual resided in this state and provided prenatal expenses or support for the child;
(e) The child resides in this state as a result of the acts or directives of the individual;
(f) The individual engaged in sexual intercourse in this state and the child may have been conceived by that act of intercourse;
(g) The individual asserted parentage of a child in a tribunal or in a putative father registry maintained in this state by the appropriate agency; or
(h) There is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this state and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction.
(2) The bases of personal jurisdiction set forth in subsection (1) or in any other law of this state may not be used to acquire personal jurisdiction for a tribunal of this state to modify a child support order of another state unless the requirements of s. 88.6111 are met, or, in the case of a foreign support order, unless the requirements of s. 88.6151 are met.
History.s. 2, ch. 96-189; s. 5, ch. 2011-92.

F.S. 88.2011 on Google Scholar

F.S. 88.2011 on Casetext

Amendments to 88.2011


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 88.2011
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 88.2011.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 88.2011

Total Results: 11

Carl Fredrik Gustafasson v. The Matter of Catherine Levine

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-02

Citation: 186 So. 3d 562, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18020

Snippet: Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, section 88.2011, Florida Statutes (2014). Furthermore, while the

Ballard v. EDD HELMS GROUP

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-12-30

Citation: 79 So. 3d 88, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20926, 2011 WL 6851248

Snippet: 79 So.3d 88 (2011) Shannon BALLARD, Appellant, v. EDD HELMS GROUP and Amerisure Insurance, Appellees

Schaffer v. Ling

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-09-28

Citation: 76 So. 3d 940, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15379, 2011 WL 4467341

Snippet: jurisdiction under sections 742.011, 48.193(l)(h), and 88.2011(6), Florida Statutes. Although he conceded that

Bouquety v. Bouquety

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-28

Citation: 933 So. 2d 610, 2006 WL 1751752

Snippet: there was notice, and the court was competent"); § 88.2011(1), Fla. Stat. (2000) (providing for broad jurisdiction

Carr v. Sharkey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-08-26

Citation: 909 So. 2d 482, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13397, 2005 WL 2043050

Snippet: personal jurisdiction over Carr under section 88.2011(5) of the Florida Statutes because he had agreed

E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-06-09

Citation: 874 So. 2d 720, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8019, 2004 WL 1252690

Snippet: proceedings to determine parentage. However, section 88.2011 lists eight bases for jurisdiction over nonresidents

Wright v. Lewis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-06-04

Citation: 849 So. 2d 379, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8286, 2003 WL 21275172

Snippet: personal jurisdiction under the UCCJA, section 88.2011(5), Florida Statutes (2000). It provides that Florida

Department of Revenue v. Cascella

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-03-17

Citation: 751 So. 2d 1273, 2000 WL 282320

Snippet: Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, section 88.2011, et seq., which replaced URESA. § 88.0011, et seq

Ginsberg v. Keehn

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-10-17

Citation: 550 So. 2d 1145, 1989 WL 99208

Snippet: Kanaki, Inc., Appellees. Nos. 88-764, 88-766 and 88-2011. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-08-16

Citation: 547 So. 2d 721, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1950, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4728, 1989 WL 97686

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) appeals a final judgment awarding Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) attorney’s fees and costs in its cross-claim against Westinghouse for indemnity. Westinghouse contends that it has no common law liability for indemnity and no contractual liability for indemnity under the indemnity provision of its contract. We agree and reverse. On appeal Prudential has abandoned its claim of entitlement to common law indemnity, and

Eldridge v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-06-09

Citation: 544 So. 2d 332, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1403, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3261, 1989 WL 61112

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Appellant contends that it was error to reclassify his conviction of aggravated battery with a firearm (a second-degree felony) to a first-degree felony pursuant to section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes (1987). That statute provides for such reclassification when a weapon is used during the commission of a felony, “except a felony in which the use of a weapon or firearm is an essential element....” As the state admits, this case falls in that exception and it was error to so enhance the