Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 90.403 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 90.403 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 90.403

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 90.403
90.403 Exclusion on grounds of prejudice or confusion.—Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. This section shall not be construed to mean that evidence of the existence of available third-party benefits is inadmissible.
History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; ss. 6, 22, ch. 78-361; ss. 1, 2, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.403 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.403 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.403


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.403
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.403.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.403

Total Results: 20

Gianino v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-04

Snippet: court must conduct the weighing required by section 90.403.” McLean v. State, 934 So. 2d 1248, 1261 (Fla.

Eric Lawrence v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-22

Snippet: unfair prejudice.” White, 971 So. 2d at 972; § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2021); Dean, 690 So. 2d at 723. This

State of Florida v. Logan Ryan Riggleman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-22

Snippet: v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1959). sections 90.403 and 90.404(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2020). This

McKee v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13

Snippet: excluded as unfairly prejudicial under section 90.403, Florida Statutes, because the testimony allowed

Anthawn Ragan, Jr. v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-30

Snippet: thereby rendering such evidence inadmissible. § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2023); Rodriguez v. State, 753 So

Leo L. Boatman v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-17

Snippet: - 24 - unfair prejudice.” § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2019). As to the photos, no definitive

Tyrone T. Johnson v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-19

Snippet: discretion in admitting it. Id. at 344 (citing § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2007)). That is not what happened

Ted'Qwon McGowan v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-11

Snippet: in the immediate aftermath of the murder. See § 90.403, Fla. Stat. We find no error, therefore the

Carlos Martinez-Urbina v. the State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-09-04

Snippet: 2010) (holding defendant did not properly preserve 90.403 objection where, during the hearing, defendant’s

Tyrone T. Johnson v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-11

Snippet: discretion in admitting it. Id. at 344 (citing § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2007)). That is not what happened

Pablo Guzman, M.D. and Holy Cross Hospital, Inc. v. Maria Joanna Lazzari, the Plenary Guardian of the Person and Property of Morela Lazzari

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-03

Snippet: Vargas, 239 So. 3d 615, 625 (Fla. 2018) (quoting § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2017)). A trial court may exclude

Tony Anthony Simmons Jr v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-19

Snippet: unfair prejudice to the defendant under section 90.403. McLean, 934 So. 2d at 1261–62. Simmons raises

Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Barbra Hoffman, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-05-01

Snippet: purpose to be relevant, and (2) under section 90.403, Florida Statutes, the danger of unfair prejudice

Philip Jude Moran v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-10

Snippet: relevant. See 6 § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (“Relevant evidence is inadmissible

MICHAEL R. JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-05

Snippet: presentation of cumulative evidence.” Id. (citing § 90.403, Fla. Stat.). To decide this issue, a court considers:

State of Florida v. Robert Jean Morris

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: necessity.”). As to unfair prejudice under section 90.403, Florida Statutes (2016), evidence should be excluded

Everett G. Miller v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-29

Snippet: white— and in any event unfairly prejudicial. See § 90.403, Fla. Stat. (“Relevant evidence is inadmissible

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. SUPERIOR AUTO GLASS OF TAMPA BAY, INC. AS ASSIGNEE OF MATTHEW DICK

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-17

Snippet: relevance with the balancing test set forth in section 90.403, Florida Statutes (2021). Balancing the spreadsheet's

State of Florida v. Christopher Russell Hubbs

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-12-06

Snippet: and inadmissible pursuant to sections 90.402 and 90.403, Florida Statutes (2023). At the hearing on

JOSEPH BLOW vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-29

Snippet: outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, see § 90.403, Fla. Stat., or is otherwise excluded by the Florida