Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 90.502 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 90.502 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 90.502 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 90.502

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 90.502
90.502 Lawyer-client privilege.—
(1) For purposes of this section:
(a) A “lawyer” is a person authorized, or reasonably believed by the client to be authorized, to practice law in any state or nation.
(b) A “client” is any person, public officer, corporation, association, or other organization or entity, either public or private, who consults a lawyer with the purpose of obtaining legal services or who is rendered legal services by a lawyer.
(c) A communication between lawyer and client is “confidential” if it is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than:
1. Those to whom disclosure is in furtherance of the rendition of legal services to the client.
2. Those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication.
(2) A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications when such other person learned of the communications because they were made in the rendition of legal services to the client.
(3) The privilege may be claimed by:
(a) The client.
(b) A guardian or conservator of the client.
(c) The personal representative of a deceased client.
(d) A successor, assignee, trustee in dissolution, or any similar representative of an organization, corporation, or association or other entity, either public or private, whether or not in existence.
(e) The lawyer, but only on behalf of the client. The lawyer’s authority to claim the privilege is presumed in the absence of contrary evidence.
(4) There is no lawyer-client privilege under this section when:
(a) The services of the lawyer were sought or obtained to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew was a crime or fraud.
(b) A communication is relevant to an issue between parties who claim through the same deceased client.
(c) A communication is relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to the client or by the client to the lawyer, arising from the lawyer-client relationship.
(d) A communication is relevant to an issue concerning the intention or competence of a client executing an attested document to which the lawyer is an attesting witness, or concerning the execution or attestation of the document.
(e) A communication is relevant to a matter of common interest between two or more clients, or their successors in interest, if the communication was made by any of them to a lawyer retained or consulted in common when offered in a civil action between the clients or their successors in interest.
(5) Communications made by a person who seeks or receives services from the Department of Revenue under the child support enforcement program to the attorney representing the department shall be confidential and privileged as provided for in this section. Such communications shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the agency except as provided for in this section. Such disclosures shall be protected as if there were an attorney-client relationship between the attorney for the agency and the person who seeks services from the department.
(6) A discussion or activity that is not a meeting for purposes of s. 286.011 shall not be construed to waive the attorney-client privilege established in this section. This shall not be construed to constitute an exemption to either s. 119.07 or s. 286.011.
History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379; s. 16, ch. 92-138; s. 12, ch. 94-124; s. 1378, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 2000-316.

F.S. 90.502 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.502 on CourtListener

Amendments to 90.502


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.502

Total Results: 223

Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications

372 F.3d 1250, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11578, 2004 WL 1301078

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 14, 2004 | Docket: 398099

Cited 897 times | Published

rendered services by a lawyer.” Fla. Evid.Code § 90.502(l)(b) (emphasis added). 30 . Jones

Traylor v. State

596 So. 2d 957, 1992 WL 4873

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1992 | Docket: 396385

Cited 368 times | Published

Johnson were privileged and therefore inadmissible. § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1985). Throughout the suppression

McWatters v. State

36 So. 3d 613, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 169, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 406, 2010 WL 958069

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2010 | Docket: 1638896

Cited 96 times | Published

“any detriment to Mr. McWatters.” We agree. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2006), establishes a statutory

Johnston v. State

497 So. 2d 863, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 585

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1986 | Docket: 1264315

Cited 74 times | Published

required the trial court to grant his motions. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1983), recognizes the attorney-client

Arbelaez v. State

775 So. 2d 909, 2000 WL 963175

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2000 | Docket: 1667832

Cited 73 times | Published

State, 530 So.2d 45, 46 (Fla.1987); see also § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1999) ("There is no attorney-client

Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. Buster

984 So. 2d 478, 2008 WL 596700

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1288177

Cited 68 times | Published

(2006) (providing for journalist's privilege); § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing for lawyer-client

Seminole County v. Wood

512 So. 2d 1000, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1987 | Docket: 473441

Cited 60 times | Published

the lawyer/client privilege codified in Florida Statute 90.502 (1985). The court noted that the communications

Neu v. Miami Herald Pub. Co.

462 So. 2d 821, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 59

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1985 | Docket: 449489

Cited 59 times | Published

privilege provisions of the Florida Evidence Code, section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981), granted an exception

Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Deason

632 So. 2d 1377, 1994 WL 70104

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1994 | Docket: 1514012

Cited 44 times | Published

legal services to the client. § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1991). Section 90.502(1)(b) defines "client" as "any

Nixon v. Singletary

758 So. 2d 618

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2000 | Docket: 54090

Cited 38 times | Published

protected by the attorney-client *625 privilege."); § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1999). We recognize that Nixon

Mobley v. State

409 So. 2d 1031

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1982 | Docket: 1307693

Cited 38 times | Published

codified as part of Florida's new evidence code. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1979). It codifies the common law

State v. Mark Marks, PA

698 So. 2d 533, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 439, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1056, 1997 WL 417282

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1997 | Docket: 288055

Cited 33 times | Published

information that can be disclosed to others. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1993); R. Regulating. Fla. Bar 4-1

Brookings v. State

495 So. 2d 135, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 445

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1986 | Docket: 1727651

Cited 33 times | Published

NOTES [1] This privilege has been codified at section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1983). [2] We urge the

American Tobacco Co. v. State

697 So. 2d 1249, 1997 WL 408527

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1997 | Docket: 1776645

Cited 31 times | Published

"crime-fraud" exception to the privilege in section 90.502(4)(a) of the Evidence Code, which provides:

Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television Corp.

431 So. 2d 627, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19833

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1983 | Docket: 453694

Cited 31 times | Published

protected by the attorney-client privilege. Section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (1981), states: A client

Jones v. State

701 So. 2d 76, 1997 WL 652073

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1997 | Docket: 1736680

Cited 30 times | Published

the record, we hold that no error occurred. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1995), pertaining to the

City of North Miami v. Miami Herald Pub. Co.

468 So. 2d 218, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 183

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1985 | Docket: 1725586

Cited 29 times | Published

and other parties were not privileged under section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981), and, thus, were subject

Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc.

701 So. 2d 557, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 704, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 1861, 1997 WL 709675

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1997 | Docket: 1448557

Cited 27 times | Published

information that can be disclosed to others. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1995) (explaining parameters of the

State v. Rabin

495 So. 2d 257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1986 | Docket: 2192378

Cited 27 times | Published

and has been codified in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1985). Section 90.502 provides, in relevant part

Hamilton v. Hamilton Steel Corp.

409 So. 2d 1111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1982 | Docket: 586212

Cited 26 times | Published

of Florida's Evidence Code.[2] We have read Section 90.502(4)(c) and (e), Florida Statutes (1979) and

In Re Federal Grand Jury Proceedings (Fgj 91-9), Ronald Cohen, in Re Federal Grand Jury Proceedings (Fgj 91-9), Nathaniel Veal, Charlie Haynes, Andy Watson, Intervenors-Appellants. In Re Federal Grand Jury Proceedings (Fgj 91-9), Robert Klausner

975 F.2d 1488

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 9, 1992 | Docket: 167525

Cited 25 times | Published

client and only she can waive it. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 90.502(3). The government argues that the privilege

Home Ins. Co. v. Advance MacHine Co.

443 So. 2d 165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1983 | Docket: 1746603

Cited 23 times | Published

attorney/client privilege are protected." (e.s.) See also Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981). We therefore reject

Tober v. Sanchez

417 So. 2d 1053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1982 | Docket: 1383700

Cited 23 times | Published

has been suggested elsewhere that by enacting Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1979), codifying the doctrine

Briggs v. Salcines

392 So. 2d 263

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 1980 | Docket: 1268242

Cited 22 times | Published

Florida's attorney-client privilege as embodied in Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1979), is broad enough to

Reed v. State

640 So. 2d 1094, 1994 WL 233888

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1994 | Docket: 1185925

Cited 20 times | Published

had waived the attorney-client privilege. See § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1991). Thus, it is clear that

Myles v. State

602 So. 2d 1278, 1992 WL 156899

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1992 | Docket: 1321783

Cited 20 times | Published

creates a broad statutory attorney-client privilege, § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1987), some aspects of the attorney-client

Dean v. Dean

607 So. 2d 494, 1992 WL 324856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1992 | Docket: 531369

Cited 18 times | Published

law, it is also generally accepted that FEC section 90.502 represents a codification of pre-code law on

Moreno v. State

418 So. 2d 1223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1982 | Docket: 1289286

Cited 18 times | Published

inadmissible evidence are: Privileged relationships, § 90.502-506, Fla. Stat.; hearsay, § 90.801, Fla. Stat

First Union Nat. Bank v. Turney

824 So. 2d 172, 2001 WL 1485659

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2001 | Docket: 1729434

Cited 17 times | Published

commit what the client knew was a crime or fraud. § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1987). The "crime-fraud exception

Hoch v. Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett

742 So. 2d 451, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12474, 1999 WL 741165

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 17, 1999 | Docket: 39097

Cited 17 times | Published

was absolutely privileged and not actionable. Section 90.502(2) provides that a client has a privilege to

Shell Oil Co. v. PAR FOUR PARTNER.

638 So. 2d 1050, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6171, 1994 WL 277945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1994 | Docket: 762424

Cited 17 times | Published

compelled disclosure to third persons. See section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (1993). This privilege

Chomat v. Northern Ins. Co. of New York

919 So. 2d 535, 2006 WL 47460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2006 | Docket: 1269761

Cited 16 times | Published

commit what the client knew was a crime or fraud." § 90.502(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2005).

Abamar Housing v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor

698 So. 2d 276, 1997 WL 345631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1997 | Docket: 434722

Cited 15 times | Published

asserted that the documents were privileged under section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1995), as they contain communications

Smith v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.

838 F. Supp. 1573, 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1360, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17441, 1993 WL 513570

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1993 | Docket: 2108130

Cited 14 times | Published

privilege. Critical language of Florida Statutes § 90.502(1)(c) is identical to that of Rule 503(a)(4) of

Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Kaufman

885 So. 2d 905, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13887, 2004 WL 2101987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2004 | Docket: 1685245

Cited 13 times | Published

1116; Doe v. Allstate, 653 So.2d at 373-74. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes, which protects attorney

Alexander v. Tandem Staffing Solutions

881 So. 2d 607, 2004 WL 1496903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2004 | Docket: 1465869

Cited 13 times | Published

arising from the lawyer-client relationship." § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003). Alexander's whistleblower

Paulucci v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

190 F. Supp. 2d 1312, 2002 WL 32107635, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10615

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2002 | Docket: 48147

Cited 13 times | Published

eviscerate the attorney-client privilege codified in Section 90.502, Florida Statutes). Accordingly, questions

First Union Nat. Bank v. Whitener

715 So. 2d 979, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 6653, 1998 WL 307572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1998 | Docket: 2549257

Cited 13 times | Published

of the first certiorari proceeding. Fraud Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1995), provides that there

Genovese v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.

74 So. 3d 1064, 2011 WL 903988

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2011 | Docket: 2354561

Cited 12 times | Published

attorney-client privilege is provided for in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2010), which states that

Milinazzo v. State Farm Insurance

247 F.R.D. 691, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90980, 2007 WL 4350865

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2007 | Docket: 66033066

Cited 11 times | Published

exception, not subject to disclosure. Fla. Stat. § 90.502. The burden of establishing the attorney-client

In Re Amendments to Fla. Evidence Code

825 So. 2d 339, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 679, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1482, 2002 WL 1476290

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2002 | Docket: 1312117

Cited 11 times | Published

Florida. Chapter 2000-316, section 1, amends section 90.502, Florida Statutes (Lawyer-client privilege)

Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. US Aviation Underwriters, Inc.

716 So. 2d 340, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10835, 1998 WL 537200

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 1998 | Docket: 424539

Cited 11 times | Published

privilege is codified in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1997). Section 90.502(1)(c) provides: A communication

Coyne v. SCHWARTZ, GOLD, COHEN, ZAKARIN

715 So. 2d 1021, 1998 WL 406585

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1998 | Docket: 1366100

Cited 11 times | Published

the rendition of legal services to the client. § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). Respondents Schwartz, Gold

State v. MARK MARKS, PA

654 So. 2d 1184, 1995 WL 132149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1995 | Docket: 1303813

Cited 11 times | Published

information that can be disclosed to others. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1993); R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-1

Turner v. State

530 So. 2d 45, 1987 WL 47314

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1988 | Docket: 1267684

Cited 11 times | Published

State, 191 So.2d 588, 590 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1985), Lawyer-Client Privilege

Watkins v. State

516 So. 2d 1043, 1987 WL 2666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1678035

Cited 11 times | Published

confidential communication in section 90.502, Florida Statutes. According to section 90.502(1)(c) "[a] communication

Hoyas v. State

456 So. 2d 1225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1984 | Docket: 1446565

Cited 11 times | Published

amendments to the United States Constitution and section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981), governing the attorney-client

City of Williston v. Roadlander

425 So. 2d 1175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1983 | Docket: 385199

Cited 11 times | Published

embraced within the attorney-client privilege of § 90.502, Florida Statutes, and thereby exempted from inspection

FLORIDA MIN. & MAT. CORP. v. Continental Cas. Co.

556 So. 2d 518, 1990 WL 10233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1990 | Docket: 1528385

Cited 10 times | Published

an exception to the privilege conferred by section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1987). Attorney-client communications

Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. City of North Miami

452 So. 2d 572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1984 | Docket: 1517621

Cited 10 times | Published

Miami and other parties were privileged under section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981), the lawyer-client

State v. Famiglietti

817 So. 2d 901, 2002 WL 879409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 1430195

Cited 9 times | Published

specific provision of the Evidence Code. Id. (citing § 90.502, Fla. Stat.). The Turner decision did not involve

Allstate Indem. Co. v. Ruiz

780 So. 2d 239, 2001 WL 121119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2001 | Docket: 1708618

Cited 9 times | Published

product and are protected from production. See § 90.502, Fla.Stat., Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(3); Am. States

Jones v. General Motors Corp.

24 F. Supp. 2d 1335, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20813, 1998 WL 758688

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1998 | Docket: 2352787

Cited 9 times | Published

corporate counsel and corporate employees); Fla. Stat. § 90.502 (1987). Plaintiffs argue that the crime-fraud

Gerheiser v. Stephens

712 So. 2d 1252, 1998 WL 374857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1998 | Docket: 1737417

Cited 9 times | Published

view to employing attorney professionally). Section 90.502(1), Florida Statutes, provides that: A communication

XL SPECIALTY INS. v. Aircraft Holdings

929 So. 2d 578, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5850, 2006 WL 1058208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2006 | Docket: 1421559

Cited 8 times | Published

disclosure by the privilege as provided in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2005). We agree with XL

Quarles & Brady, LLP v. Birdsall

802 So. 2d 1205, 2002 WL 21849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 2002 | Docket: 1698975

Cited 8 times | Published

granted the motion. We now quash that order. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2001), states that "[a]

The Florida Bar v. Lange

711 So. 2d 518, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 263, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 862, 1998 WL 238757

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1998 | Docket: 404187

Cited 8 times | Published

matter to The Florida Bar. [2] Similarly, under section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1997): "(4) There is no

Cuillo v. Cuillo

621 So. 2d 460, 1993 WL 98649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1993 | Docket: 1266143

Cited 8 times | Published

is authorized by Savino, 92 So.2d at 817, or section 90.502(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), which says

Kleinfeld v. State

568 So. 2d 937, 1990 WL 126378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1990 | Docket: 1526581

Cited 8 times | Published

evidence is covered by the Florida Evidence Code, section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1988). There is a provision

Procacci v. Seitlin

497 So. 2d 969, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1986 | Docket: 383204

Cited 8 times | Published

malpractice in the conduct of that transaction, see § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1985), and by voluntarily disclosing

Donner v. Edelstein

415 So. 2d 830

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1982 | Docket: 1512981

Cited 8 times | Published

whether by enacting the Florida Evidence Code, Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981) (effective date July

Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor Insurance

295 F.R.D. 550, 2013 WL 3853388, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103309

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2013 | Docket: 66051501

Cited 7 times | Published

attorney-client privilege. Florida Statutes section 90.502 provides, in relevant part:135 (l)(b) A “client”

Campero USA Corp. v. ADS Foodservice, LLC

916 F. Supp. 2d 1284, 2012 WL 6838937, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184497

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2012 | Docket: 65987811

Cited 7 times | Published

federal common law of privilege) with Fla. Stat. § 90.502 (the codification of the Florida attorney-client

Minakan v. Husted

27 So. 3d 695, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 288, 2010 WL 174333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2010 | Docket: 1664999

Cited 7 times | Published

exception" to the attorney-client privilege. See § 90.502(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009) ("There is no lawyer-client

Jenney v. Airdata Wiman, Inc.

846 So. 2d 664, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8281, 2003 WL 21276005

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2003 | Docket: 1301458

Cited 7 times | Published

confidential communications between a lawyer and client. § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). A communication is "confidential"

City of Oldsmar v. Kimmins Contracting Corp.

805 So. 2d 1091, 2002 WL 126366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2002 | Docket: 1669444

Cited 7 times | Published

nature of attorney-client communications. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1999). Here, the trial court determined

Horning-Keating v. State

777 So. 2d 438, 2001 WL 108754

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2001 | Docket: 1513963

Cited 7 times | Published

attorney-client privilege through the enactment of section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1997): (2) A client has

Owen v. State

773 So. 2d 510, 2000 WL 1353873

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 2000 | Docket: 1687539

Cited 7 times | Published

the rendition of legal services to the client. § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (1999). Although the privilege

Volpe v. Conroy, Simberg & Ganon, PA

720 So. 2d 537, 1998 WL 438957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1998 | Docket: 1719010

Cited 7 times | Published

communications would not be privileged under section 90.502(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Volpe v. Conroy, Simberg & Ganon, PA

720 So. 2d 537, 1998 WL 438957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1998 | Docket: 1719010

Cited 7 times | Published

communications would not be privileged under section 90.502(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Robichaud v. Kennedy

711 So. 2d 186, 1998 WL 241539

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1998 | Docket: 1338009

Cited 7 times | Published

commit what the client knew was a crime or fraud." § 90.502(4), Fla. Stat. (1995). To meet this statutory

Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Egly

507 So. 2d 1180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1987 | Docket: 459971

Cited 7 times | Published

protected by the attorney-client privilege, section 90.502 Florida Statutes (1985). Although the staff

Corry v. Meggs

498 So. 2d 508, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2392

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1986 | Docket: 1699832

Cited 7 times | Published

communication" and "lawyer-client privilege" provided in Section 90.502, Florida Statutes; (II) because the "last-link"

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Habelow

405 So. 2d 1361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1981 | Docket: 1348436

Cited 7 times | Published

Jardine, 366 So.2d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). See also § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1979). The trial court's order apparently

Ford Motor Co. v. Hall-Edwards

997 So. 2d 1148, 2008 WL 5070290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 2008 | Docket: 2525419

Cited 6 times | Published

for the transmission of the communication. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2000); Southern Bell Tel., 632 So

Provenzano v. Singletary

3 F. Supp. 2d 1353, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23071, 1997 WL 909440

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1997 | Docket: 790918

Cited 6 times | Published

policeman walk in. I'll show them." (R. 920-23.) Section 90.502 of the Florida Statutes defines the contours

Allstate Ins. v. AMERICAN SOUTHERN HOME

680 So. 2d 1114, 1996 WL 587878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 1663829

Cited 6 times | Published

production to opposing parties pursuant to section 90.502, Florida Statutes, and Rule 1.280(b)(3), Florida

Fla. Sheriffs'self-Ins. Fund v. Escambia Cty.

585 So. 2d 461, 1991 WL 173053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1991 | Docket: 1688546

Cited 6 times | Published

privilege found in the Florida Evidence Code, section 90.502(4)(c) and (e), viz.: (4) There is no lawyer-client

Tail of the Pup, Inc. v. Webb

528 So. 2d 506, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3029, 1988 WL 72247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 1367923

Cited 6 times | Published

*507 applies when the client is a corporation. Section 90.502(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1987). In Florida

YOUNG, STERN & TANNENBAUM v. Smith

416 So. 2d 4

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1982 | Docket: 1654998

Cited 6 times | Published

Ehrenfeld, 392 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Section 90.502(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1979). We are cognizant

Deehl v. Knox

414 So. 2d 1089

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1982 | Docket: 1358644

Cited 6 times | Published

attorney-client privilege is specifically recognized by § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1979) as a basis for advising one

S & I Investments v. Payless Flea Market, Inc.

10 So. 3d 699, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6043, 2009 WL 1456938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 2538813

Cited 5 times | Published

has been codified in our Evidentiary Code. Section 90.502(1), Florida Statutes, provides: (c) A communication

BNP PARIBAS v. Wynne

967 So. 2d 1065, 2007 WL 3274884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2007 | Docket: 1733480

Cited 5 times | Published

did not apply to questions about the writ. See § 90.502(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2007). It ordered Duke to respond

Wagner v. Orange County

960 So. 2d 785, 2007 WL 1709537

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2007 | Docket: 1165155

Cited 5 times | Published

the attorney-client privilege contained in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1985), and subsection 119

Shafnaker v. Clayton

680 So. 2d 1109, 1996 WL 587876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 1664023

Cited 5 times | Published

and the trial court's broad interpretation of section 90.502(4)(c), allowing discovery by an attorney of

Dennis v. Brummer

479 So. 2d 857, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 18

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1985 | Docket: 2558013

Cited 5 times | Published

defender asserted the attorney-client privilege. See § 90.502(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.Bar Code Prof.Resp

Donner v. Edelstein

423 So. 2d 367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1982 | Docket: 2527408

Cited 5 times | Published

order entered September 17, 1982, ruled that Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981) (effective July 1

Lender Processing Services, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Co.

183 So. 3d 1052, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5873, 2015 WL 1809318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 60252915

Cited 4 times | Published

from the essential requirements of the law. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes, which is entitled “Lawyer-client

Nova Southeastern University, Inc. v. Jacobson

25 So. 3d 82, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20008, 2009 WL 4928032

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1196340

Cited 4 times | Published

necessary for the transmission of the communication. § 90.502(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008). The privilege belongs

Progressive Exp. Ins. Co. v. Scoma

975 So. 2d 461, 2007 WL 1296007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2007 | Docket: 1425596

Cited 4 times | Published

The attorney-client privilege is codified in section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (2000), which states:

Black v. State

920 So. 2d 668, 2006 WL 26185

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2006 | Docket: 1730630

Cited 4 times | Published

We find no abuse of discretion in this case. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes, codifies the attorney-client

Jacob v. Barton

877 So. 2d 935, 2004 WL 1666065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2004 | Docket: 1285057

Cited 4 times | Published

trustee holds the lawyer-client privilege. See § 90.502(2), (3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001); Whitener, 715 So

General Motors Corp. v. McGee

837 So. 2d 1010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 1527516

Cited 4 times | Published

such as the crime fraud exception, applies. See § 90.502(4)(a)-(e), Fla. Stat. (1997); E. Air Lines, Inc

State v. Marks

758 So. 2d 1131, 2000 WL 313507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 1404151

Cited 4 times | Published

information that can be disclosed to others. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1993); R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-1

Cone v. Culverhouse

687 So. 2d 888, 1997 WL 30323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1997 | Docket: 1371053

Cited 4 times | Published

lawyer-client privilege contains this exception in section 90.502(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1995): 90.502 Lawyer-client

The Haskell Co. v. Georgia Pacific Corp.

684 So. 2d 297, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12912, 1996 WL 714066

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1996 | Docket: 1740953

Cited 4 times | Published

exceptions to the privilege is applicable. See § 90.502(4), Fla. Stat. (1995). When a privilege is facially

McKinlay v. McKinlay

648 So. 2d 806, 1995 WL 1524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1995 | Docket: 1343122

Cited 4 times | Published

and the lawyer-client privilege set forth in section 90.502, Florida Statutes, can be waived. See, e.g

Adelman v. Adelman

561 So. 2d 671, 1990 WL 62821

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 1341256

Cited 4 times | Published

by counsel for the adverse party. See generally § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (1989) and law revision council

Brevard Community College v. Barber

488 So. 2d 93, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 831

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1986 | Docket: 1685439

Cited 4 times | Published

the attorney-client privilege, as codified in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981), and by the work product

Tucker v. State

484 So. 2d 1299, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 589

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1986 | Docket: 1343912

Cited 4 times | Published

Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, 2d Ed., § 507.1. See also § 90.502(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (1983). The issue in Miller

Montanez v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

135 So. 3d 510, 2014 WL 1255333, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4604

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2014 | Docket: 60239671

Cited 3 times | Published

privileged attorney-client communications. Section 90.502(l)(e), Florida Statutes (2012), provides generally

Hagans v. GATORLAND KUBOTA, LLC/SENTRY INS.

45 So. 3d 73, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13720, 2010 WL 3583987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2010 | Docket: 2398292

Cited 3 times | Published

This petition for writ of certiorari followed. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2009), sets forth the attorney-client

In Re Lentek Intern., Inc.

377 B.R. 396, 2007 WL 3036861

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2007 | Docket: 1103607

Cited 3 times | Published

in Section 90.502 of the Florida Evidence Code, titled "Lawyer-client privilege." Section 90.502(1)(b)

In Re Lentek Intern., Inc.

377 B.R. 396, 2007 WL 3036861

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2007 | Docket: 1103607

Cited 3 times | Published

in Section 90.502 of the Florida Evidence Code, titled "Lawyer-client privilege." Section 90.502(1)(b)

Reynolds v. State

963 So. 2d 908, 2007 WL 2428452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2007 | Docket: 1697415

Cited 3 times | Published

might deny coverage or reserve its rights[.]" Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2006), provides that communications

Cunningham v. Appel

831 So. 2d 214, 2002 WL 31267760

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2002 | Docket: 1722785

Cited 3 times | Published

an attorney has an informational advantage. Section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes, provides that a client

Smith v. Smith

764 So. 2d 650, 2000 WL 574485

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 2000 | Docket: 272341

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida Bar, or in the Florida Evidence Code. § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1999). The order below thus is a

Compton v. West Volusia Hosp. Authority

727 So. 2d 379, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 1999 WL 110832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 1438973

Cited 3 times | Published

her lifetime, by the attorney-client privilege. § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. Communications with an attorney

Compton v. West Volusia Hosp. Authority

727 So. 2d 379, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 1999 WL 110832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 1438973

Cited 3 times | Published

her lifetime, by the attorney-client privilege. § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. Communications with an attorney

Hill v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

701 So. 2d 1218, 1997 WL 734944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1997 | Docket: 1736873

Cited 3 times | Published

question are exempt from disclosure pursuant to section 90.502, Florida Statutes. In City of North Miami v

Old Stone Bank v. Farris

647 So. 2d 916, 1994 WL 665722

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1994 | Docket: 1524799

Cited 3 times | Published

waive all privileges as to others. See generally § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1989); Southern Bell Tel. & Tel.

Mercado v. Parent

421 So. 2d 740

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1982 | Docket: 1719555

Cited 3 times | Published

The lawyer-client privilege is codified in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1979) and enables the lawyer

Dees v. Scott

347 So. 2d 475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1977 | Docket: 1290768

Cited 3 times | Published

Code, which becomes effective July 1, 1977. See § 90.502, Florida Statutes (1976 Supplement). Whether a

Nemours Found. v. Arroyo

262 So. 3d 208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2018 | Docket: 64701374

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida's attorney-client privilege, codified at section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2017), extends to communications

Randy W. Tundidor v. State of Florida

221 So. 3d 587, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 507, 2017 WL 1506854, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 925

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2017 | Docket: 5813559

Cited 2 times | Published

their clients are protected by privilege. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat.; see also McWatters v. State, 36 So

Coffey-Garcia and Garcia v. South Miami Hospital, Inc.

194 So. 3d 533, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9575, 2016 WL 3410415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2016 | Docket: 3081240

Cited 2 times | Published

governed by the Florida Evidence Code, codified at section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2013). The right as it pertains

AG Beaumont 1, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

160 So. 3d 510, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4031, 2015 WL 1259649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2015 | Docket: 60246877

Cited 2 times | Published

The attorney-client privilege is codified in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2013): “A client has a privilege

Markel American Insurance Co. v. Baker

152 So. 3d 86, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19141, 2014 WL 6488823

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2014 | Docket: 60245004

Cited 2 times | Published

law firm representing Markel. . See generally § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2013) (governing "[Ijawyer-client

Boozer v. Stalley

146 So. 3d 139, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13872, 2014 WL 4375873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2014 | Docket: 60242853

Cited 2 times | Published

note that there is no exception provided under section 90.502 that allows the discovery of attorney-client

Guarantee Insurance v. Heffernan Insurance Brokers, Inc.

300 F.R.D. 590, 2014 WL 2653480, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80757

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2014 | Docket: 66053381

Cited 2 times | Published

Inc., 698 So.2d 276, 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) ("Section 90.502(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that

Tumelaire v. Naples Estates Homeowners Ass'n

137 So. 3d 596, 2014 WL 1801239, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6741

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2014 | Docket: 60240385

Cited 2 times | Published

attorney-client privilege. Pursu*599ant to section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (2013), “[a] client has

R.L.R. v. State

116 So. 3d 570, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9688, 2013 WL 3034732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2013 | Docket: 60232396

Cited 2 times | Published

regulate all attorneys in the state of Florida.3 Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2012), states, “[A] client

Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. v. Kozumi USA Corp.

295 F.R.D. 517, 2013 WL 5952096, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160287

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2013 | Docket: 66051471

Cited 2 times | Published

attorney-client privilege afforded pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 90.502 and Fed. R.Evid. 502. . Although the assertion

Preferred Care Partners Holding Corp. v. Humana, Inc.

258 F.R.D. 684, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107977, 2009 WL 982449

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 2009 | Docket: 66038283

Cited 2 times | Published

to be disclosed to third persons.” Fla. Stat. § 90.502(1)(c); accord Cunningham v. Appel, 831 So.2d 214

West Bend Mutual Insurance v. Higgins

9 So. 3d 655, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2657, 2009 WL 790145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 2009 | Docket: 1222398

Cited 2 times | Published

statute and contained in the Evidence Code, section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2007). The purpose of the

Mordenti v. State

982 So. 2d 710, 2008 WL 465588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2008 | Docket: 1664239

Cited 2 times | Published

information; it is not a test of admissibility. See § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2006) ("A client has a privilege

State v. Branham

952 So. 2d 618, 2007 WL 941132

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2007 | Docket: 1703235

Cited 2 times | Published

The Basis for the Lawyer-Client Privilege Section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (2005), provides that

Florida Marlins Baseball Club, LLC v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. 893/HC/97/9096

900 So. 2d 720, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6007, 2005 WL 957126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2005 | Docket: 463217

Cited 2 times | Published

privilege, Whittle is an attorney pursuant to section 90-502(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2004), as he is a

Herrera v. Herrera

895 So. 2d 1171, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 1255091

Cited 2 times | Published

agreement, and the process of the negotiations. See § 90.502(1)(c), Fla. Stat. (2002); Jenney v. Airdata Wiman

UNITED SERV. AUTO. ASS'N v. Roth

859 So. 2d 1270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 1284934

Cited 2 times | Published

protected by the attorney-client privilege under section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2002). That privilege covers

Sultan v. Earing-Doud

852 So. 2d 313, 2003 WL 21749584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2003 | Docket: 1305603

Cited 2 times | Published

who is the one protected by the privilege. See § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2002). While Sultan's counsel

Tyne v. Time Warner Entertainment Co.

212 F.R.D. 596, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25339, 2002 WL 31955432

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2002 | Docket: 66018017

Cited 2 times | Published

transmission of the communication. Fla. Stat. § 90.502(l)(c). Florida law defines a “lawyer” as one who

Omega Consulting Group, Inc. v. Templeton

805 So. 2d 1058, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 396, 2002 WL 83912

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2002 | Docket: 1241941

Cited 2 times | Published

controversy with the other." Id. at 1103; see § 90.502(4)(e), Fla. Stat. (2000). Additionally, we note

Indiantown Realty Partners, Ltd. Partnership v. Brown-Harward (In Re Indiantown Realty Partners, Ltd. Partnership)

270 B.R. 532

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 4, 2001 | Docket: 1501639

Cited 2 times | Published

an attorney and his client is set forth in section 90.502 of the Florida Statutes. The scope of the attorney-client

Knowles v. State

800 So. 2d 259, 2001 WL 1193728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2001 | Docket: 1283234

Cited 2 times | Published

lawyer-client privilege." The privilege is codified at section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (1993), which provides

Heddon v. State

786 So. 2d 1262, 2001 WL 669348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2001 | Docket: 1278941

Cited 2 times | Published

violation of the law. Relying on both Fisher and section 90.502, Florida Statutes, we held that because the

Kilbourne & Sons v. Kilbourne

677 So. 2d 855, 1995 WL 746378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1995 | Docket: 1272902

Cited 2 times | Published

"confidential communication" within the purview of section 90.502, Florida Statutes. See, Watkins v. State, 516

State v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO.

582 So. 2d 1, 1990 WL 205512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1990 | Docket: 1363286

Cited 2 times | Published

the attorney/client privilege, pursuant to section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1990), from giving *3 depositions

STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES v. Kropff

445 So. 2d 1068

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1984 | Docket: 1287844

Cited 2 times | Published

certain of these documents are privileged under section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981), has been addressed

State Ex Rel. Reno v. Neu

434 So. 2d 1035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1983 | Docket: 1318274

Cited 2 times | Published

granted municipalities by the Evidence Code. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981). We are therefore

City of Tampa v. Titan Southeast Construction Corp.

535 F. Supp. 163, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11540

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1982 | Docket: 1332956

Cited 2 times | Published

or private, who consults a lawyer..." Fla.Stat. § 90.502(1)(b) (emphasis added). The inclusion of public

Lerma-Fusco v. Smith

220 So. 3d 562, 2017 WL 2605129, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2017 | Docket: 6079325

Cited 1 times | Published

addressed at the subsequent evidentiary hearing. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2015). Thus, Florida Rule of Appellate

Lee v. Condell and Estache

208 So. 3d 253, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18366

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2016 | Docket: 4552614

Cited 1 times | Published

attorney-client privilege as a “communication” under section 90.502(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), we deny the

In re International Oil Trading Co.

548 B.R. 825, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 61, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 1856, 62 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 145, 2016 WL 1729227

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Apr 28, 2016 | Docket: 65788563

Cited 1 times | Published

the exceptions explicitly provided in Fla. Stat. § 90.502, which states, in relevant part: (c) A communication

Tedrow v. Cannon

186 So. 3d 43, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2391, 2016 WL 670348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 2016 | Docket: 3037723

Cited 1 times | Published

counsel in order to prove his claim for fees. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2011),' protects communications

Las Olas River House Condominium Ass'n v. Lorh, LLC

181 So. 3d 556, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18400, 2015 WL 8347977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2015 | Docket: 60252593

Cited 1 times | Published

the rendition of -legal services to the client.” § 90.502(2), Fla.Stat. (2014) (emphasis added). A communication

Batchelor v. Geico Casualty Co.

142 F. Supp. 3d 1220, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144891

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2015 | Docket: 64305139

Cited 1 times | Published

legal services to the client[s].”45 Fla. Stat. § 90.502(2). Insurers who retain attorneys to defend them

State v. Avery Topps

142 So. 3d 978, 2014 WL 3730009, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11606

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2014 | Docket: 3598

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida privileges, i.e., lawyer-client privilege (§ 90.502(l)(c)l., 2.), sexual assault counselor-victim

Brugmann v. State

117 So. 3d 39, 2013 WL 2494244, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9297

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60232659

Cited 1 times | Published

was involuntarily waived. Additionally, under section 90.502(4)(a), if a client consults an attorney for

Witte v. Witte

126 So. 3d 1076, 2012 WL 1108539, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5178

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2012 | Docket: 60236173

Cited 1 times | Published

At the hearing, the wife’s counsel relied on section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2011). Subsection 90.502(2)

State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Puig

62 So. 3d 23, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3902, 2011 WL 1008266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2011 | Docket: 2361030

Cited 1 times | Published

communications between attorneys and their clients. See § 90.502(4), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing a limited list

Allstate Insurance v. Levesque

263 F.R.D. 663, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12865, 2010 WL 376068

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2010 | Docket: 66040321

Cited 1 times | Published

to be disclosed to third persons.” Fla. Stat. § 90.502(l)(c). A party may waive the privilege if the

Mullins v. Tompkins

15 So. 3d 798, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9955, 2009 WL 2151906

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2009 | Docket: 1660982

Cited 1 times | Published

testimony. [2] The privilege is codified in section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (2008): "A client has

1550 Brickell Associates v. Q.B.E. Insurance

253 F.R.D. 697, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83357

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2008 | Docket: 66036120

Cited 1 times | Published

law in diversity actions. Under Florida statute § 90.502, the attorney-client privilege exists when a client

Samuel v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSP. AND CLINICS

984 So. 2d 627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2008 | Docket: 1685641

Cited 1 times | Published

the rendition of legal services to the client." § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). The Evidence Code defines

Kranias v. Tsiogas

941 So. 2d 1173, 2006 WL 2923579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2006 | Docket: 1523655

Cited 1 times | Published

privilege. The circuit court based its holding on section 90.502(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2002), which provides

Anderson Columbia v. Brown

902 So. 2d 838, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4954, 2005 WL 831360

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2005 | Docket: 64838464

Cited 1 times | Published

Deason, 632 So.2d 1377, 1380 (Fla.1994). See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2003). As this court noted in First

Ginsburg v. Pachter

893 So. 2d 586, 2004 WL 2173638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2004 | Docket: 1378365

Cited 1 times | Published

the asserted privilege. The letter referenced section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2003), and cited Southern

Caputo v. Nouskhajian

871 So. 2d 266, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3505, 2004 WL 533555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 64829956

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence because of the attorney-client privilege. Section 90.502(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2000), authorizes

Hodgson Russ, LLP v. Trube

867 So. 2d 1246, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3310, 2004 WL 515565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2004 | Docket: 64828881

Cited 1 times | Published

exception to the attorney-client privilege of section 90.502(4)(a), Florida Statutes has been met, the trial

Niles v. Mallardi

828 So. 2d 1076, 2002 WL 31374844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2002 | Docket: 429904

Cited 1 times | Published

the crime/fraud exception to the privilege. Section 90.502(4), Florida Statutes (2002) provides that there

Estate of Tobias ex rel. Tobias v. Barnaby

804 So. 2d 553, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 2002 WL 54061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2002 | Docket: 64811606

Cited 1 times | Published

as to some of them. 409 So.2d at 1113 (citing § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat.). We thus conclude that there

Barlow v. State

784 So. 2d 482, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3225, 2001 WL 245755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2001 | Docket: 64805190

Cited 1 times | Published

attorney-client privilege, and argues it on appeal. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes which covers lawyer-client

In Re College Landings Ltd. Partnership

248 B.R. 619, 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 1923, 1998 WL 1545437

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1998 | Docket: 1422790

Cited 1 times | Published

the attorney-client privilege set forth in Section 90.502 of the Florida Statutes. The issue is whether

Blackhawk Tennessee, Ltd. Partnership v. Waltemyer

900 F. Supp. 414, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15477, 1995 WL 613795

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1995 | Docket: 2115213

Cited 1 times | Published

v. Dean, 607 So.2d 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Section 90.502(1)(b), Florida Evidence Code, defines "client"

Charles B. Pitts Real Estate v. Hater

602 So. 2d 961, 1992 WL 81056

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1992 | Docket: 1694014

Cited 1 times | Published

inviolate under the lawyer-client privilege. See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1989). During the one-year life of

Breanden Beneschott v. Toptal, LLC, Taso Duval and Denis Grosz

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2025 | Docket: 69905400

Published

(Fla. 1994) [hereinafter Southern Bell] (citing § 90.502(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1991)). The privilege covers

Mitchell Robert Landis v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455586

Published

630, 633 (Fla. 1991). Further, according to section 90.502(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2022), a client in

AKERMAN, LLP v. SANDRA COHEN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2022 | Docket: 65742512

Published

privilege belongs to and protects the client. See § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“A client has a privilege

PAPA JOHN'S USA, INC., A FOREIGN PROFIT CORPORATION, AND LORENA GONZALEZ vs PAULA MOORE

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2022 | Docket: 64881538

Published

in rendition of legal services to the client.” § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2021). However, “A person who

WILLIAM HAMILTON ARTHUR ARCHITECT, INC. v. JEFFREY C. SCHNEIDER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2022 | Docket: 63556633

Published

Absent extraordinary circumstances delineated by section 90.502 of the Florida Statutes – the statute that

KELLY NELSON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2022 | Docket: 63144881

Published

analysis to the deposition. Codified in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2022), “[t]he attorney-

KELLY NELSON v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2021 | Docket: 60858264

Published

analysis to the deposition. Codified in section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2021), “[t]he attorney-

EDWARD BRINKMANN v. PETRO WELT TRADING

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2021 | Docket: 60496868

Published

asserting the long-established attorney-client, see § 90.502, or accountant-client, see § 90.5055, privileges

Tina Lasonya Brown v. State of Florida & Tina Lasonya Brown v. Mark S. Inch, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2020 | Docket: 17505087

Published

exclude the email under section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (2019). Section 90.502(2) provides that “[a]

STEVEN PAUL ANDERSON v. MARY MITCHELL

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2019 | Docket: 14883383

Published

rendition of legal services to the client." § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2017) (emphasis added); see also

Nemours Found. v. Arroyo

262 So. 3d 208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2018 | Docket: 64701375

Published

Florida's attorney-client privilege, codified at section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2017), extends to communications

Sedgwick Claims v. Feller

243 So. 3d 465

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2018 | Docket: 6300766

Published

departure from the essential requirements of law. See § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2006); see also Genovese v. Provident

State Farm v. Knapp

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2018 | Docket: 6262720

Published

The attorney-client privilege is governed by section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2016), which provides that

United Services Auto. Assoc. v. Law Offices of Herssein and Herssein, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2017 | Docket: 6240831

Published

Florida’s attorney-client privilege is codified in section 90.502(2) of the Florida Statutes (2017), which provides

City of Homestead v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 2017 | Docket: 6183871

Published

under Chapter 119, section 768.28(16)(b), and section 90.502, as they contained the impressions of attorneys

OIL, LLC v. Stamax Corp.

220 So. 3d 1198, 2017 WL 2664686, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8988

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2017 | Docket: 60267163

Published

Consistent with this well-established legal rule, section 90.502(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2015), provides that

Douberley v. Perlmutter

219 So. 3d 854, 2017 WL 2264617, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7542

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2017 | Docket: 60266949

Published

what the client kneio was a crime or fraud.” See. § 90.502(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016) (emphasis added). The

Heather Worley v. Central Florida Young Men's Christian, etc.

228 So. 3d 18, 2017 WL 1366126

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 4684625

Published

governed by the Florida Evidence Code, codified at section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2015). Under the Florida

Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. Devine

262 F. Supp. 3d 1312

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 64314915

Published

attorney-client privilege is codified in Fla. Stat, § 90.502. See Centennial Bank v. Servisfirst Bank Inc.

Office of the Public Defender v. Lakicevic

215 So. 3d 112, 2017 WL 697688, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 4608345

Published

*113 and not subject to disclosure. See § 90.502(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015) 1 R.L.R. v

Vasallo v. Bean

208 So. 3d 188, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15906

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2016 | Docket: 4482642

Published

essential requirements of the law. See § 90.502(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing that “[t]here

Bivins v. Rogers

207 F. Supp. 3d 1321, 2016 WL 4702682, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120892

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 64310274

Published

the rendition of legal services to the client.” § 90.502, Fla. Stat. The confidentiality of attorney-client

Mobley and Sanders v. Homestead Hospital, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4114292

Published

generally not privileged and are discoverable.5 See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2016); Upjohn Co. v. United States

Mobley and Sanders v. Homestead Hospital, Inc.

202 So. 3d 868, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11076

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4112461

Published

and are discoverable. 5 See § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2016); Upjohn Co. v. United

Panebianco v. Jackson Health System

183 So. 3d 1250, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 892, 2016 WL 297273

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2016 | Docket: 60252949

Published

opportunity to be heard and call witnesses). Sde also § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014) (no attorney-client privilege

Nick Panebianco, Esq./ etc. v. Jackson Health System and Cannon Cochran etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2016 | Docket: 3030460

Published

opportunity to be heard and call witnesses). See also § 90.502(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014) (no attorney- client

Las Olas River House Condominium Association, Inc., The Continental Group, Inc. John Quaintance, Jerome Schechter and Arminda Figueroa v. Lorh, LLC, Sandy Robert Levy, CPA, PL, d/b/a Choice Realty and Sandy Robert Levy

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2015 | Docket: 3019343

Published

the rendition of legal services to the client.” § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2014) (emphasis added).

Michael Brannon, PSY.D, and Amlong & Amlong, P.A. v. Daniel Palcu and State of Florida

177 So. 3d 693, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16008, 2015 WL 6496327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2015 | Docket: 3007734

Published

protected as an attorney-client communication. § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2015). Respondent countered that

Jacobs Keeley, PLLC v. Chief Judge of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit

169 So. 3d 192, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9254, 2015 WL 3760060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2015 | Docket: 2679262

Published

Administration 2.420(c)(1) and 2.420(c)(7), and section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2014) pertaining to the

Florida Power & Light Company v. Mark W. Hicks

162 So. 3d 1074, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5508, 2015 WL 1667033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 2015 | Docket: 2679399

Published

note that there is no exception provided under section 90.502[, Florida Statutes] that allows the discovery

Melinda Butler v. Sarah Harter

152 So. 3d 705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2014 | Docket: 2610365

Published

The attorney-client privilege is set forth in section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes, which states, “[a] client

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. (In re Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.)

493 B.R. 872, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 149, 2013 WL 3550651, 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2801

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2013 | Docket: 65785203

Published

transmission of the communication. Fla. Stat. § 90.502(l)(c). “[F]or a privileged document to lose its

Garcia v. Holdsworth (In re Holdsworth)

495 B.R. 544, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 131, 2013 WL 2237530, 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2130

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 21, 2013 | Docket: 65785329

Published

of 30. . Fed.R.Evid. 501. . § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. . § 90.502(4)(a), Fla. Stat. . First Union

Florida Department of Revenue v. Collingwood

43 So. 3d 952, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13723, 2010 WL 3583985

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2010 | Docket: 2399989

Published

represents the agency and not the recipient); § 90.502(5), Fla. Stat. (2010) (provides that communications

Scott v. Scott

17 So. 3d 918, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15578, 2009 WL 3277335

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2009 | Docket: 1989024

Published

668 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We recognize that section 90.502(4), Florida Statutes (2008), outlines five

Samuel ex rel. Mathis v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.

984 So. 2d 627, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 10827

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2008 | Docket: 64855121

Published

the rendition of legal services to the client.” § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). The Evidence Code defines

Moecker v. Greenspoon, Marder, Hirschfeld, Rafkin, Ross, Berger & Abrams Anton P.A.

377 B.R. 396

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2007 | Docket: 65783324

Published

in Section 90.502 of the Florida Evidence Code, titled “Lawyer-client privilege.” Section 90.502(l)(b)

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Roth

859 So. 2d 1270, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 64826563

Published

protected by the attorney-client privilege under section 90.502, Florida Statutes (2002). That privilege covers

Butler, Pappas, Weihmuller v. Coral Reef of Key Biscayne Developers, Inc.

873 So. 2d 339, 9 A.L.R. 6th 769, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18093, 2003 WL 22800190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 2003 | Docket: 64830649

Published

applied to the attorney-client privilege, under section 90.502(4), Florida Statutes. In support of Coral Reefs

Rogers v. State

742 So. 2d 827, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11833, 1999 WL 682603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 1999 | Docket: 64791502

Published

raising Mr. Rogers’ lawyer-client privilege under section 90.502(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997). The State sought

Caridi v. Inorganic Recycling Corp.

715 So. 2d 1072, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9777, 1998 WL 439261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1998 | Docket: 64782150

Published

obtained disqualification of petitioner’s counsel. Section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1997) entitled “Lawyer-Client

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 15, 1997 | Docket: 3256542

Published

an attorney-client privilege was created by section 90.502, Florida Statutes, by which governmental bodies

Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Barnes

689 So. 2d 1200, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2122, 1997 WL 106987

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 64771811

Published

are protected by the attorney client privilege. § 90.502(2), Fla. Stat. (1995); United Servs. Auto Ass’n

Allstate Insurance Co. v. American Southern Home Insurance Co.

680 So. 2d 1112

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1996 | Docket: 64768127

Published

production to opposing parties pursuant to section 90.502, Florida Statutes, and Rule 1.280(b)(3), Florida

Del Carmen Calzon v. Capital Bank

689 So. 2d 279, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502, 1995 WL 699894

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1995 | Docket: 64771605

Published

departure from the essential requirements of section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1995). This departure may

H.A.W. v. State

652 So. 2d 948, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1995 | Docket: 64755237

Published

evaluation. DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur. . Section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (1993) provides that:

HAW v. State

652 So. 2d 948, 1995 WL 137087

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1995 | Docket: 66819

Published

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 90.502(2), Florida Statutes (1993) provides that:

Thebaut v. Boyle

650 So. 2d 698, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1735, 1995 WL 71131

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1995 | Docket: 64754374

Published

within the lawyer-client privilege. The notes to section 90.502(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1993), indicate that

Sanchez v. State

641 So. 2d 433, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7895, 1994 WL 416982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1994 | Docket: 64750391

Published

subject to the attorney-client privilege. See § 90.502(l)(e)(2), Fla. Stat.(1993); Keir v. State, 152

Transmark, USA, Inc. v. State, Department of Insurance

631 So. 2d 1112, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1994 | Docket: 64746300

Published

date it claims (i.e., September 1992). . Section 90.502(4)(e) states that there is no lawyer-client

In re Federal Grand Jury Proceedings

975 F.2d 1488

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 9, 1992 | Docket: 66278102

Published

client and only she can waive it. Fla.Stat. Ann. § 90.502(3). The government argues that the privilege was

Burt v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

603 So. 2d 125, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8514, 1992 WL 187219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1992 | Docket: 64669222

Published

client are privileged and not discoverable. See § 90.502, Fla.Stat. (1991); Upjohn Co. v. United States

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. K.A.W.

557 So. 2d 601, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 504, 1990 WL 6564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1990 | Docket: 64648565

Published

privilege which is personal to the individual. See § 90.502, Florida Statutes (1987) and Rule 4-1.7-9, Rules

Pan American Bank of Orlando v. Orange County

460 So. 2d 1021, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 70, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16237

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1984 | Docket: 64608807

Published

protected by the attorney-client privilege (see § 90.502(2), Fla.Stat.) are exempt from the disclosure

Brevard County v. Nash

468 So. 2d 240, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 73, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1984 | Docket: 2544968

Published

sought is protected by the lawyer-client privilege. § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (1983). Respondent says that privilege

Ringsmuth v. State

444 So. 2d 592, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11562

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1984 | Docket: 64602468

Published

communications between an attorney and his client, section 90.502, Florida Statutes (1981), and there is no evidence

Axon v. B & W Ltd., Inc.

444 So. 2d 457, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1983 | Docket: 64602392

Published

facilitate the rendition of legal services by a lawyer. § 90.502(2), Fla.Stat. (1981). The communication must be