Cases from cite.case.law:

NOCK, v. STATE, 256 So. 3d 828 (Fla. 2018)

. . . the defendant's statement and (2) whether the State is permitted to impeach a defendant under section 90.806 . . . We also hold that a defendant is subject to impeachment under section 90.806(1) whenever the defendant . . . However, the Fourth District concluded that Foster is contrary to section 90.806(1), precedent of the . . . In support of its holding, this Court specifically acknowledged that "pursuant to section 90.806(1), . . . Section 90.806(1) has not been altered since this Court decided Kaczmar . . . .

PHILLIPS, v. STATE, 238 So. 3d 845 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 90.806(1), Fla. Stat. (2017) ; Gonzalez v. State , 948 So.2d 877, 878 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). . . .

R. MORRIS, v. STATE, 233 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 2018)

. . . See § 90.806(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

MORRIS, v. STATE, 219 So. 3d 33 (Fla. 2017)

. . . See § 90.806(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

NOCK, v. STATE, 211 So. 3d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . portions of the statements were elicited when the defense cross-examined the detective, then section 90.806 . . . Section 90.806(1), Florida Statutes (2014), provides: When a hearsay statement has been admitted in evidence . . . But, Foster runs contrary to section 90.806(1) and our precedent. See, e.g., Kelly v. . . .

T. KENNER, v. STATE, 208 So. 3d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 90.806(1), Fla, Stat. (2016). . . .

GUDMESTAD, v. STATE, 209 So. 3d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 90.806(1) provides: “When a hearsay statement has been admitted in evidence, credibility of the . . . statements, the trial court erred by allowing the State to attack Gudmestad’s credibility under section 90.806 . . .

GIBSON, v. STATE, 199 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . court ruled that the defendant could be impeached with his prior felony convictions pursuant to section 90.806 . . .

FOSTER, v. STATE, 182 So. 3d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . defense objection, admitted the certified copies of Foster’s convictions into evidence under section 90.806 . . .

BANK OF NEW YORK, v. CALLOWAY,, 157 So. 3d 1064 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . litigation in so ruling; however, because Knowles satisfied the business records requirements under 90.806 . . .

MATHIS, v. STATE, 135 So. 3d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 90.806(1), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “[wjhen a hearsay statement has been admitted . . . State, 889 So.2d 743, 755-56 (Fla.2004), the Florida Supreme Court held that “section 90.806 permits . . .

KACZMAR, III, v. STATE Of, 104 So. 3d 990 (Fla. 2012)

. . . door to impeachment of those statements by introducing Kaczmar’s prior felonies pursuant to section 90.806 . . . State, 943 So.2d 296, 297 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), pursuant to section 90.806(1), once a defendant introduces . . . State, 857 So.2d 949, 949-50 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (finding that pursuant to section 90.806(1), such generally . . .

HAYES, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .”); § 90.806(1), Fla.Stat. . . .

FREEMAN, v. STATE, 74 So. 3d 123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 90.806(1), Fla. Stat. See § 90.610(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

HAMPTON, v. STATE, 4 So. 3d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Under section 90.806(1), Florida Statutes, the state was allowed to introduce appellant’s prior convictions . . .

THOMPSON, v. STATE, 995 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . this issue at trial, and the trial court ruled that such evidence would be admissible under section 90.806 . . . SILBERMAN and CANADY, JJ., Concur. . 90.806. . . .

MOORE, v. STATE, 994 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Moore argues that subsection 90.806(1) of the Florida Statutes permitted him to attack the credibility . . .

MOORE, v. STATE, 943 So. 2d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . See § 90.806(1), Fla. Stat. (2005); see also Kelly v. . . .

REAVES, v. STATE, 942 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 2006)

. . . testimony were inconsistent with his 1987 trial testimony and should have been admitted pursuant to section 90.806 . . .

RAY, v. STATE, 933 So. 2d 716 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Such evidence is admissible under section 90.806(1), Florida Statutes (2004), and “should be considered . . .

FISHER, Jr. v. STATE, 924 So. 2d 914 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . evidence of Fisher’s alibi and opened the door to impeachment through his prior convictions under section 90.806 . . . The court admitted evidence of Fisher’s prior felony conviction under section 90.806(1), Florida Statutes . . .

FITZPATRICK, v. STATE, 900 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2005)

. . . Further, the trial court properly admitted the statements for impeachment purposes pursuant to section 90.806 . . . by the declarant ... inconsistent with the declarant’s hearsay statement,” which pursuant to section 90.806 . . .

HUGGINS, v. STATE, 889 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2004)

. . . told him, which would be necessary for impeachment of Huggins as a hearsay declarant under section 90.806 . . . 90.403, I nonetheless question whether the admission of Huggins’ prior record is authorized by section 90.806 . . . Section 90.806(1) provides that the credibility of a hearsay declarant “may be attacked ... by any evidence . . . However, section 90.806(1), which governs impeachment of hearsay de-clarants rather than witnesses, authorizes . . . The court reviewed the trial transcript and found the convictions admissible under section 90.806, Florida . . . The trial court admitted the fact of Huggins’ convictions on the basis of section 90.806(1), Florida . . . ruling was made in accordance with First and Fourth District Court of Appeal holdings that section 90.806 . . . Under section 90.806(1), a hearsay declarant is treated as a “witness” and his or her credibility may . . . Thus, pursuant to section 90.806, as properly construed in Llanos, Werley, and Kelly, Huggins opened . . .

L. BLANTON, v. STATE, 880 So. 2d 798 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Appellant's argument overlooks, however, section 90.806, Florida Statutes, which excepts the need for . . .

SMITH, v. STATE, 880 So. 2d 730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 90.806; Hill v. State, 549 So.2d 179, 181 (Fla.1989). That was not the case here. . . .

KELLY, v. STATE, 857 So. 2d 949 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The state relied on section 90.806(1), saying that the convictions impeached defendant’s credibility . . . We agree with the state that it was proper to admit the convictions under section 90.806. . . . Section 90.806(1) provides: “When a hearsay statement has been admitted in evidence, credibility of the . . . We previously confronted similar impeachment of a defendant’s pretrial statements under section 90.806 . . . Section 90.806 allows this specific use of such impeachment evidence. See 5 Jack B. . . .

A. JACKSON, v. STATE, 832 So. 2d 885 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . court ruled that the defendant could be impeached with his prior felony convictions pursuant to section 90.806 . . .

WERLEY, v. STATE, 814 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . trial court allowed the admission of Appellant’s six prior felony convictions, pursuant to section 90.806 . . . State, 770 So.2d 725 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(ruling that, pursuant to § 90.806, trial court properly took . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 778 So. 2d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . order to impeach appellant’s statement to the officer that he had not been drinking, citing section 90.806 . . . We find nothing in section 90.806(1) which would authorize the officer to testify as to what the passenger . . . Section 90.806(1) provides that where a hearsay statement is admitted into evidence, the credibility . . .

J. LLANOS, v. STATE, 770 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Florida Statutes (1999), the declarant’s credibility and possible bias may be impeached under section 90.806 . . . Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s ruling under section 90.806, Florida Statutes (1999). . . . convicted, or if the crime involved dishonesty or a false statement regardless of the punishment. . .. .90.806 . . . R.Evid. 806 which is almost identical to section 90.806, Florida Statutes (1999)). . . .

REAVES, v. STATE, 639 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1994)

. . . , were inconsistent with his 1987 trial testimony and should have been admitted pursuant to section 90.806 . . . Section 90.806, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: (1) When a hearsay statement has been admitted in . . .

ALEXANDER, v. BIRD ROAD RANCH STABLES, INC. a a A. a a, 599 So. 2d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . State, 448 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); § 90.806(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). We disagree. . . .

STATE v. HILL,, 504 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . hearing by evidence of subsequent contradictory statements seems to have been contemplated by section 90.806 . . . Munson’s former trial testimony, that Hill may introduce evidence of the post-trial recantation. § 90.806 . . .

A. T. a v. STATE, 448 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . .-803 and 90.806 Florida Statutes (1983). . . .