Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 92.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 92.06 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 92.06

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.06
92.06 Judgments and decrees of United States District Courts.All final judgments and decrees heretofore or hereafter to be rendered and entered in the United States District Courts of this state and certified copies thereof are declared to be admissible as prima facie evidence in the several courts of this state of the entry and validity of such judgments and decrees.
History.s. 1, ch. 14748, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 4391(1).

F.S. 92.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.06


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.06
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.06.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.06

Total Results: 8

In Re Guardianship of Sitter

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-02-15T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 779 So. 2d 346

Snippet: in the amount of $4,630. The fee request was for 92.6 hours over 16 months, at an hourly rate of $50.

State v. Setzler

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-10-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 667 So. 2d 343

Snippet: .2d 350 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Pineda v. State, No. 92-06-AP (Fla. 8th Cir. Ct. March 19, 1993). The defense

Bird Lakes Development Corp. v. Meruelo

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-06-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 626 So. 2d 239

Snippet: Affirmed in part, reversed in part. Nos. 92-59, 92-6 and 91-2646 District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freeman v. Rubin

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-08-12T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 318 So. 2d 540

Snippet: the subject order was admissible pursuant to § 92.06, Fla. Stat., F.S.A.[2] Hence, we find that the trial

Mann v. Thompson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-02-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 100 So. 2d 634

Snippet: v. H. Baars & Co., 60 Fla. 253, 54 So. 92. [6] Webster Lumber Co. v. Lincoln, 94 Fla. 1097,

Crawford v. McGraw

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1952-11-20T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 61 So. 2d 484

Snippet: 51 Jul 17 1,171.92 6,668.38* -----------------------------------

Skipper v. Schumacher

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-05-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 169 So. 58, 124 Fla. 384

Snippet: proceeding. Linch v. Broad, 70 Tex. 92[70 Tex. 92], 6 S.W. 751. But an attack by habeas corpus on the

Jackson v. Haisly

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1891-01-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 27 Fla. 205

Snippet: Lewis, Executor vs. Meginniss, 25 Fla., 589, 591-92; 6 Southern Reporter, 169; Cook vs. Cook, 104 Ill.,