The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.19

92.19 Portions of records.—In all cases where any certified copy of any record, pleading, document, deed, conveyance, paper or instrument in writing, involving the title to real estate shall be lawfully admissible in evidence in any of the courts of this state, a certified copy of such portions of such instrument as shall contain the essential parts thereof and only such portion of the descriptive matter thereof as shall be involved in the case on trial, shall likewise be admissible in evidence; and in no case shall it be necessary to include in such certified copies descriptive matter not involved in the case in which such copy is offered in evidence.

History.—s. 1, ch. 10237, 1925; CGL 4400.

F.S. 92.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.19

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.19

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.19.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BROWN, v. MID- AMERICA APARTMENTS, LP, LP d b a s LP, 348 F. Supp. 3d 594 (W.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . MAA argues that Section 92.19 does not require landlords to conduct a prospective estimate of damages . . .

PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC. v. PRC- DESOTO INTERNATIONAL, INC. PPG, 268 F. Supp. 3d 1071 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . Exhibit E is an invoice showing that Plaintiff purchased a product from PPG at a per-unit cost of $92.19 . . .

GREAT LAKES BUSINESS TRUST Co. LLC, v. M T ORANGE SUN, S. A., 855 F. Supp. 2d 131 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . came back online) until March 31, 2010 (a total of 577 days), the Dredge’s utilization rate rose to 92.19 . . . That accounts for the delta between 92.19 percent and a 100 percent utilization rate: for the first 24 . . . Rosenfarb applied the 92.19 percent utilization rate that was actually achieved between November 2007 . . . profits associated with the repair and startup periods total $11,736,645, based on: • $58,843 per day @ 92.19 . . .

JOHN B. v. EMKES,, 852 F. Supp. 2d 957 (M.D. Tenn. 2012)

. . . For the most recent complete year, FY 2010, the overall component compliance rate was 92.19 percent, . . .

NIOBRARA RIVER RANCH, L. L. C. a M. v. HUBER, Ft. USF W A. A., 277 F. Supp. 2d 1020 (D. Neb. 2003)

. . . This means that 92.19% of the persons viewing the scenic river through the Ft. . . .

B. E. v. L. J. v., 76 T.C. 759 (T.C. 1981)

. . . See 9 C.F.R. secs. 92.11, 92.19-92.20. . . .

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC. v. HAWKINS, T. H., 357 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 1978)

. . . The company’s actual equity/debt ratio was 92.19% to 7.81%. . . . This ratio is erroneously shown in the Commission’s order on reconsideration as “92.19% equity/.0781% . . .

W. TUNNELL K. v. UNITED STATES M. TUNNELL, Jr. S. v. UNITED STATES, 367 F. Supp. 557 (D. Del. 1973)

. . . 1967 for concrete squares to cover water valves; $155.00 to Don Penuel & Lankford Sign Co. in 1967; $92.19 . . .

CARDINAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. UNITED STATES, 300 F. Supp. 387 (N.D. Tex. 1969)

. . . 1959 1960 Premium income $ -0--0-436.54 290.37 651.90 Dividend income 897.20 595.80 2,583.76 667.72 92.19 . . .

B. v., 47 T.C. 609 (T.C. 1967)

. . . At the settlement they received $407.81, leaving them with a net cash outlay of $92.19 at that time. . . . The latter amount, together with the $92.19 retained by the sellers of the Lee Drive property per settlement . . .

BOROUGH OF RINGWOOD v. THE UNITED STATES, 153 Ct. Cl. 71 (Ct. Cl. 1961)

. . . collections of the sixteen municipalities in Passaic County, New Jersey, varied between an annual average of 92.19 . . .

GENERAL PROPERTIES CORPORATION v. R. H. GORE, R. H. GORE COMPANY,, 153 Fla. 236 (Fla. 1943)

. . . See Sections 92.05, 92.10, and 92.19, Fla. Stats. 1941. . . .

STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. MOORE, 88 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1937)

. . . 1931, and accrued penalties $222.60, and for the year 1932, $737.50 taxes, likewise a lien, and for $92.19 . . .