Florida Statute 92.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.25

92.25 Records destroyed by fire; use of abstracts.—Whenever in the trial of any suit, or in any proceeding in any court of this state, it shall be made to appear that the original of any deed or other instrument of writing, or of any record of any court relating to any land, the title thereof or any interest therein being in controversy in such suit or proceeding, is lost or destroyed, or not within the power of the party to produce the same, and that the record thereof has been heretofore destroyed by fire, and that no certified copy of such record is in the possession or control of such party, it is lawful for such party, and the court shall receive as evidence, any abstract of title, or letter-press copy thereof made in the ordinary course of business prior to such loss or destruction; and it is also lawful for any such party to offer, and the court shall receive as evidence, any copy, extract or minutes from such destroyed records, or from the original thereof, which were at the date of such destruction in the possession of any person or persons then engaged in the business of making abstracts of titles for others for hire.

History.—s. 1, ch. 4951, 1901; GS 1529; RGS 2729; CGL 4401.

F.S. 92.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.25

Total Results: 5

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2010-01-04

Snippet: instruments affecting real property. 7 See s. 1, Ch. 92-25, Laws of Fla. 8 See Florida House of Representatives

Shiva v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-03-23

Citation: 899 So. 2d 1150, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5175, 2005 WL 662644

Snippet: scoresheet which showed a sentencing range of 55.35 to 92.25 months. He did not seek to withdraw his plea. This

Toson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-01-14

Citation: 864 So. 2d 552, 2004 WL 57292

Snippet: years in prison, and on counts III, IV and V to 92.25 months in prison on each count. Toson argues that

Verbeck v. Altman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-02-10

Citation: 613 So. 2d 591, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1638

Snippet: LETTS, Judge. We agree with the appellants’ argument that the trial court incorrectly determined that a “jumbo” certificate of approximately $33,000 was not a probate asset. The record demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that no survivorship provision was instituted nor intended. We would elaborate further on the facts surrounding the title to the certificate; however, the foregoing does not control the outcome of this appeal. The offending probate order conclusively determined a disputed

Ocklawaha River Farms Co. v. Young

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-01-31

Citation: 73 Fla. 159

Snippet: 1043, 1 Ann. Cas. 626; Beidler v. Crane, 135 Ill. 92, 25 N. E. Rep. 655; Hendricks v. Mount, 5 N. J. L.