Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 101.041 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 101.041 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 101.041

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS
Chapter 101
VOTING METHODS AND PROCEDURE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 101.041
101.041 Secret voting.In all elections held on any subject which may be submitted to a vote, and for all or any state, county, district, or municipal officers, the voting shall be by secret, official ballot as provided by this code, and no vote shall be received or counted in any election, except as prescribed by this code.
History.s. 24, ch. 3879, 1889; RS 178; s. 28, ch. 4328, 1895; GS 210; RGS 254; CGL 310; s. 3, ch. 17898, 1937; s. 5, ch. 26870, 1951; s. 13, ch. 77-175; s. 15, ch. 2008-95.
Note.Former s. 99.08.

F.S. 101.041 on Google Scholar

F.S. 101.041 on Casetext

Amendments to 101.041


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 101.041
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 101.041.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 101.041

Total Results: 20

Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections, Inc. v. Browning

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-02-11

Citation: 28 So. 3d 880, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 101, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 218, 2010 WL 455276

Snippet: election, except as prescribed by this code.” § 101.041, Fla. Stat. (2006). Section 6.2C clearly conflicts

Browning v. Sarasota Alliance

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-10-31

Citation: 968 So. 2d 637, 2007 WL 3170111

Snippet: election, except as prescribed by this code." § 101.041. The Election Code's ten chapters and 125 pages

Hall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-04-08

Citation: 634 So. 2d 1124, 1994 WL 115278

Snippet: 410 So.2d 950 (citing Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791 (1906)). The state now argues that we should

Wrobel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-02-17

Citation: 410 So. 2d 950

Snippet: testimony of reputation. Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791 (1906). A defendant may place in issue

Bowles v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-03-19

Citation: 381 So. 2d 326

Snippet: for truth and veracity. Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791 (1906). The court there held that: "..

In the Interest of G. C. O. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-03-07

Citation: 309 So. 2d 608, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14444

Snippet: 195, 71 So. 328; Maloy v. State, 1906, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791; Morris v. State, 1930, 100 Fla. 850, 130

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-01-29

Snippet: content of a person's ballot is secret. Compare s. 101.041, F.S. Section 98.211, F.S., while declaring registration

Spradley v. Bailey

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-03-08

Citation: 292 So. 2d 27

Snippet: quoted with approval from Tebbe v. Smith, 108 Cal. 101, 41 P. 454, the following language and indicated thereby

McCrea v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-05-21

Citation: 210 So. 2d 724, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5591

Snippet: 48 Fla. 59, 37 So. 575; Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791; Hysler v. State, 85 Fla. 153, 95 So. 573

Alliegro v. Pan American Bank of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-01-15

Citation: 136 So. 2d 656

Snippet: judgment against the Parent in the sum of $1,119,101.41 together with accrued interest; in addition, the

Story v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1951-07-31

Citation: 53 So. 2d 920, 1951 Fla. LEXIS 1632

Snippet: and also in the cases of Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791, and Dedge v. State, 68 Fla. 240, 67 So

State Ex Rel. Miller v. Carmichael

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-09-27

Citation: 197 So. 857, 144 Fla. 319, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1047

Snippet: the rule as stated in Tebbe v. Smith, 108 Cal. 101, 41 P. 454, 455, 29 L.R.A. 673, 49 Am. St. Rep. 68

State Ex Rel. Peacock v. Latham

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-10-22

Citation: 170 So. 472, 125 Fla. 788, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1354

Snippet: stated in the case of Tebbe v. Smith, 108 Cal. 101,41 P. 454, 29 L.R.A. 673, in the following language:

State Ex Rel. Peacock v. Latham

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-10-14

Citation: 170 So. 475, 125 Fla. 779, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1353

Snippet: App. 521, 49 S.W. 699; Tebbe v. Smith, 108 Cal. 101, 41 P. 454, 29 L.R.A. 673; Ogg v. Glover, 72 Kan. 247

Layne v. Tribune Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-02-03

Citation: 146 So. 234, 108 Fla. 177

Snippet: publications. Stewart v. Minnesota Tribune Co., 40 Minn. 101, 41 N.W. Rep. 457, 12 A. S. R. 696. Publishers of newspapers

State Ex Rel. Millinor v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-10-22

Citation: 144 So. 333, 107 Fla. 134

Snippet: been tampered with. See Tebbe, vs. Smith, 108 Cal. 101,41 P. 454, 49 A.S.R. 68, 29 L.R.A. 673. In this case

Browne v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-08-21

Citation: 109 So. 811, 92 Fla. 699

Snippet: himself a witness. See Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101,41 South. Rep. 791; Dedge v. State, 68 Fla. 240; *Page

Holmes v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-04-01

Citation: 103 So. 642, 89 Fla. 336

Snippet: 498, 81 South. Rep. 782; Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 South. Rep. 791. We have read the evidence as disclosed

Ammons v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1924-12-16

Citation: 88 Fla. 444, 102 So. 642

Snippet: 36, 37 South. Rep. 334; Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 South. Rep. 791. The same rule applies to charges

Whitten v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-08-12

Citation: 82 Fla. 181, 89 So. 421

Snippet: 98, 43 South. Rep. 312; Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 South. Rep. 791; Pittman v. State, 51 Fla. 94,