CopyCited 227 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 36 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1270, 78 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6250, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22209
engaged in the transportation of individuals ...” Section 101(45) defines "relative” as an "individual related
0 red1 yellow391 green0 procedural
CopyCited 10 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | 1995 WL 55284
relationship within such third degree...." 11 U.S.C.S. § 101(45).
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
CopyCited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida
...follows in full: Every citizen of the United States who is at least eighteen years of age and who is a permanent resident of the state, if registered as provided by law, shall be an elector of the county where registered. Art. VI, § 2, Fla. Const. Section 101.045, Florida Statutes (2004), addresses general voter precinct requirements and provides as follows in relevant part: No person shall be permitted to vote in any election precinct or district other than the one in which the person has his or her legal residence and in which the person is registered. § 101.045(1), Fla....
...The Present Case As noted above, the Legislature is authorized to impose reasonable and necessary regulations on the "place" at which an elector may cast his or her vote. The traditional precinct-specific provision that applies to all voters is codified in section
101.045 and has been a feature of Florida election law for decades. See §
101.045, Fla. Stat. (2004). The plaintiffs do not challenge the validity of that provision. Rather, they challenge only the precinct-specific provision in section
101.048. Yet, the plaintiffs fail to show how section
101.048 is distinguishable from section
101.045 in this regard. Under their reasoning, if the precinct-specific provision in section
101.048 were to be held invalid, then the traditional precinct-specific provision in section
101.045 also would be infirm. We conclude that the precinct-specific provision in section
101.048 is a regulation of the voting process, not a qualification placed on the voter, and is no more unreasonable or unnecessary than the comparable provision in section
101.045, which has been operative for decades....
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CopyCited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 33258310
...Article V, section 8, of the Florida Constitution provides that: "No person shall be eligible for office of justice or judge of any court unless the person is an elector of the state and resides in the territorial jurisdiction of the court. " [e.s.] At the same time, section 101.045(1) provides: "No person shall be permitted to vote in any election precinct or district other than the one in which the person has his or her legal residence and in which the person is registered." [e.s.] § 101.045, Fla....
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
CopyCited 1 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida | 7 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 306, 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1802, 1993 WL 499373
called a "Security Interest" by the Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101(45) (1982 ed., Supp. IV), and (2) Involuntary secured
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CopyPublished | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal
...there was no impropriety in accepting their votes. The alleged incompetent voter and the
4
The Supervisor and the trial court found the 3 votes by individuals who no longer
resided in Putnam County were proper under section 101.045....
...located when the person has no permanent address in the
county and it is the person’s intention to remain a resident
of Florida and of the county in which he or she is registered
to vote.
§ 101.045(1), Fla....
...Nonetheless,
mere interest in and a connection to a county are insufficient to allow those who reside
outside a county to maintain a voice in its elections. We find the situations of these 3
voters to not be the type of temporary absence contemplated by section 101.045(1).
Therefore, the Supervisor’s and the trial court’s determinations that those voters were
eligible to vote in the election were incorrect.
The largest category of votes on which Kinney relies to support his argument to...
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 57 A.L.R. 6th 797, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 597, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 1815, 2004 WL 2331776
...follows in full: Every citizen of the United States who is at least eighteen years of age and who is a permanent resident of the state, if registered as provided by law, shall be an elector of the county where registered. Art. VI, § 2, Fla. Const. Section 101.045, Florida Statutes (2004), addresses general voter precinct requirements and provides as follows in relevant part: No person shall be permitted to vote in any election precinct or district other than the one in which the person has his or her legal residence and in which the person is registered. § 101.045(1), Fla....
...The Present Case As noted above, the Legislature is authorized to impose reasonable and necessary regulations on the “place” at which an elector may cast his or her vote. The traditional precinct-specific provision that applies to all voters is codified in section
101.045 and has been a feature of Florida election law for decades. See §
101.045, Fla. Stat. (2004). The plaintiffs do not challenge the validity of that provision. Rather, they challenge only the precinct-specific provision in section
101.048. Yet, the plaintiffs fail to show how section
101.048 is distinguishable from section
101.045 in this regard. Under their reasoning, if the precincUspecific provision in section
101.048 were to be held invalid, then the traditional precinct-specific provision in section
101.045 also would be infirm. We conclude that the precinct-specific provision in section
101.048 is a regulation of the voting process, not a qualification placed on the voter, and is no more unreasonable or unnecessary than the comparable provision in section
101.045, which has been operative for decades....
