The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 107
CONVENTIONS TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 107.05

107.05 Official ballots.—The ballots shall be prepared by the Department of State and distributed by it to the county commissioners in the several counties at least 10 days prior to such election. They shall contain the substance of the proposed amendment and in alphabetical order:

(1) The names of all candidates who shall have declared in favor of the ratification of such amendment;

(2) The names of all candidates who shall have declared against the ratification of such amendment; and

(3) The names of all candidates who shall have qualified without pledging themselves either for or against the amendment.

When delegates are elected at general elections as provided in s. 107.03, such matters shall be printed on the general election ballots. In either event, in addition to the names of unpledged candidates printed on said ballots and whether there be any such names on said ballots or not, there shall be provided, under subsection (3) blank lines in equal number to the number of persons who may be elected as such delegates.

History.—s. 5, ch. 16180, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 319(5); ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 107.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 107.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 107.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 107.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 107.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCNEAL, v. ARCELORMITTAL USA, INC., 143 F. Supp. 3d 241 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05 (3d ed. 2003) (internal cross-reference omitted); Steel . . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05 (3d ed. 2003) (internal cross-reference omitted); see . . .

In GENERAL MOTORS LLC IGNITION SWITCH LITIGATION, 69 F. Supp. 3d 404 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05 (3d ed.2012)) (alteration in original). . . .

In STANDARD POOR S RATING AGENCY LITIGATION., 23 F. Supp. 3d 378 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05 (3d ed.2012). . . .

In REDONDO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, v., 678 F.3d 115 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . In marshaling its resistance, it points to paragraph 107.05 of the Blue Book, which states: When the . . . The federal government was not a party to any of the contracts at issue here, and paragraph 107.05 cannot . . .

In REDONDO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, v., 678 F.3d 115 (1st Cir. 2012)

WINE COUNTRY GIFT BASKETS. COM K L L. L. R. v. T. STEEN, Jr. Jr., 612 F.3d 809 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Code § 107.05. . . . Bev.Code §§ 107.05(a) & 107.07(a). . . . written, of the personal importation exception authorized by Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code sections 107.05 . . .

In REDONDO CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, v., 424 B.R. 29 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2010)

. . . The Blue Book, Exhibit 53, at ¶ 107.05, states that when the United States Government participates in . . .

SIESTA VILLAGE MARKET LLC, Dr. v. T. STEEN, Jr. Jr. K L L. L. R. v., 595 F.3d 249 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . Bev.Code § 107.05. . . . Bev.Code §§ 107.05(a) & 107.07(a). . . . court’s holding that the personal import exception authorized by Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code sections 107.05 . . .

SIESTA VILLAGE MARKET, LLC, d b a v. PERRY,, 530 F. Supp. 2d 848 (N.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . §§ 6.01, 6.03, 11.01, 11.03, 11.46(a)(ll), 11.61(b)(19), 22.01, 22.03, 24.01, 24.03, 41.01, 54.12, 107.05 . . . See id. §§ 107.05(a) and 107.07(a). . . . Accordingly, the challenged ban on consumer imports of wine embodied in §§ 107.05(a) and 107.07(a) is . . . 19), 22.03 (version before it was amended in 2007), 22.03 (current version), 24.01(c), 24.03, 54.12, 107.05 . . . The court also enjoins enforcement of §§ 107.05(a) and 107.07(a), as applied to Texas consumers who seek . . .

C. MYER E. v. NITETRAIN COACH COMPANY, INC., 459 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (W.D. Wash. 2006)

. . . , 526 U.S. 344, 355, 119 S.Ct. 1322, 143 L.Ed.2d 448 (1999); see also 16 Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05 . . .

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL LTD. L. A. H. E. Jr. L. H. v. A. v., 422 F. Supp. 2d 357 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05 (3d ed.2003)). C. . . .

SHINN o b o SHINN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 391 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 2004)

. . . Section 107.05 of the Listings specifies the limitations that an individual with sickle cell disease . . . Listing § 107.05. . . . presented two types of evidence to demonstrate that she suffered from the limitation described in Listing § 107.05 . . .

In J. RILEY. L. v., 297 B.R. 122 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 2003)

. . . 64.24 3/05/01 $ 53.51 3/05/01 $ 2200.00 3/11/01 $ 4200.00 3/16/01 $ 7500.00 3/22/01 $ 115.11 3/22/01 $ 107.05 . . .

C. A. DICKERSON R. v. BAILEY,, 336 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . Plaintiffs, determining that (1) § 107.07(f) is facially unconstitutional, and (2) §§ 6.01, 11.01, "37.07, 107.05 . . . liquor into [Texas], regardless of whether the sale is consummated inside or outside the state”); § 107.05 . . . Id, at 696 (enjoining enforcement of §§ 6.01, 11.01, 37.03, 107.05(a), 107.07(a), and 107.07(f)). . . .

WILDS, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. a k a I II III IV I II III IV V VI WILDS v., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05 (3d ed.2003) (internal cross-reference omitted); see . . .

C. A. DICKERSON, R. v. BAILEY,, 212 F. Supp. 2d 673 (S.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . .”); § 107.05(a) (“No person may import liquor into the state and deliver it to a person not authorized . . . liquor into this state, regardless of whether the sale is consummated inside or outside the state.”); § 107.05 . . . Defendant’s motion to reconsider argued that under § 107.05(a), no person may import any liquor into . . .

WILSON, v. S. APFEL,, 179 F.3d 1276 (11th Cir. 1999)

. . . Teresa Felten on March 29, 1996, indicating that Anastasia met Listings 107.05(A) and (D), either of . . .

In A. MILLER, f k a AT T v. A., 228 B.R. 237 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1998)

. . . The next statement, dated February 24, reflected $107.05 in charges, no payments, and no cash advances . . .

MARATHON OIL COMPANY, A S, v. A. G. RUHRGAS,, 145 F.3d 211 (5th Cir. 1998)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 107.05, at 107-24 through 107-25 & nn. 5, 6 (3d ed.1997) (citing . . .

In CRISPIN, CRISPIN v. NORWEST FINANCIAL,, 139 B.R. 187 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1992)

. . . Hawkland, UCC Series sec. 9-107.05 (1986 & Supp.1990) (addressing various approaches different courts . . .

NASH, ALEXANDER, v. R. BOWEN,, 882 F.2d 1291 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . Second, the listing for childhood sickle cell anemia (section 107.05) differs greatly from the listing . . . EQUIVALENCE TO SICKLE CELL ANEMIA LISTING The AU evaluated Alan’s impairment under section 107.05 of . . . That section provides in part: 107.05 Sickle Cell Anemia. With: A. . . . report, the AU held that Alan’s impairment did not meet or equal any of the requirements of section 107.05 . . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1, Section 107.05. . . .

THOMPSON THOMPSON, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 559 F. Supp. 548 (E.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . See, e.g., 20 C.F.R.App. 1, §§ 11.02, 107.05. . . .

G. HODGSON, v. J. RANCOURT,, 336 F. Supp. 1119 (Bankr. D.R.I. 1972)

. . . .-00, making a total of $107.05 as back wages due to her. . . .

L. ZEEMAN, S. Jr. v. UNITED STATES, 395 F.2d 861 (2nd Cir. 1968)

. . . returns for the years 1960 and 1961 reflecting taxable income in the amounts of $83,359.79 and $89,-107.05 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JANNUZZIO, 184 F. Supp. 460 (D. Del. 1960)

. . . Income tax 2nd quarter $525.40 withheld) Count II (F.I.C.A.) “ “ 95.60 Count III (Income tax 3rd quarter 107.05 . . .

NORTON v. UNITED GAS CORPORATION, 1 F.R.D. 155 (W.D. La. 1940)

. . . to the Texarkla the “oil rights only” in two leases “in so far as said leases covered approximately 107.05 . . .

v., 40 F. 446 (E.D. Mo. 1889)

. . . Fees charged for drawing “recognizances” and “complaints,” amounting in the aggregate to $107.05, form . . . entitled to recover all that is claimed in his account for drawing recognizances and complaints, to-wit, $107.05 . . .