Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 110.112 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 110.112 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 110.112

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 110.112
110.112 Affirmative action; equal employment opportunity.
(1) It is the policy of this state to assist in providing the assurance of equal employment opportunity through programs of affirmative and positive action that will allow full utilization of women, minorities, and individuals who have a disability.
(2)(a) The head of each executive agency shall develop and implement an affirmative action plan in accordance with rules adopted by the department and approved by a majority vote of the Administration Commission before their adoption.
(b) Each executive agency shall establish annual goals for ensuring full utilization of groups underrepresented in the agency’s workforce, including women, minorities, and individuals who have a disability, as compared to the relevant labor market, as defined by the agency. Each executive agency shall design its affirmative action plan to meet its established goals.
(c) Each executive agency shall annually report to the department regarding the agency’s progress toward increasing employment among women, minorities, and individuals who have a disability.
(d) An affirmative action-equal employment opportunity officer shall be appointed by the head of each executive agency. The affirmative action-equal employment opportunity officer’s responsibilities must include determining annual goals, monitoring agency compliance, and providing consultation to managers regarding progress, deficiencies, and appropriate corrective action.
(e) The department shall report information in its annual workforce report relating to the implementation, continuance, updating, and results of each executive agency’s affirmative action plan for the previous fiscal year. The annual workforce report must also include data for each executive agency relating to employment levels among women, minorities, and individuals who have a disability.
(f) The department shall provide to all supervisory personnel of the executive agencies training in the principles of equal employment opportunity and affirmative action, the development and implementation of affirmative action plans, and the establishment of annual affirmative action goals. The department may contract for training services, and each participating agency shall reimburse the department for costs incurred through such contract. After the department approves the contents of the training program for the agencies, the department may delegate this training to the executive agencies.
(3)(a) The department, in consultation with the Agency for Persons with Disabilities, the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the Division of Blind Services of the Department of Education, the Department of Commerce, and the Executive Office of the Governor, shall develop and implement programs that incorporate internships, mentoring, on-the-job training, unpaid work experience, situational assessments, and other innovative strategies that are specifically geared toward individuals who have a disability.
(b) By January 1, 2017, the department shall develop mandatory training programs for human resources personnel and hiring managers of executive agencies which support the employment of individuals who have a disability.
(c)1. By January 1, 2017, each executive agency shall develop an agency-specific plan that addresses how to promote employment opportunities for individuals who have a disability.
2. The department shall assist executive agencies in the implementation of agency-specific plans. The department shall regularly report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives the progress of executive agencies in implementing these plans. Such reports shall be made at least biannually.
(d) The department shall compile data regarding the hiring practices of executive agencies with regard to individuals who have a disability and make such data available on its website.
(e) The department shall assist executive agencies in identifying and implementing strategies for retaining employees who have a disability which include, but are not limited to, training programs, funding reasonable accommodations, increasing access to appropriate technologies, and ensuring accessibility of physical and virtual workplaces.
(f) The department shall adopt rules relating to forms that provide for the voluntary self-identification of individuals who have a disability and are employed by an executive agency.
(g) This subsection does not create any substantive or procedural right or benefit enforceable at law or in equity against the state or a state agency, or an officer, employee, or agent thereof.
(4) Each state attorney and public defender shall:
(a) Develop and implement an affirmative action plan.
(b) Establish annual goals for ensuring full utilization of groups underrepresented in its workforce as compared to the relevant labor market in this state. The state attorneys’ and public defenders’ affirmative action plans must be designed to meet the established goals.
(c) Appoint an affirmative action-equal employment opportunity officer.
(5) The state, its agencies and officers shall ensure freedom from discrimination in employment as provided by the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, by s. 112.044, and by this chapter.
(6) Any individual claiming to be aggrieved by an unlawful employment practice may file a complaint with the Florida Commission on Human Relations as provided by s. 760.11.
(7) The department shall review and monitor executive agency actions in carrying out the rules adopted by the department pursuant to this section.
History.s. 20, ch. 79-190; s. 1, ch. 89-149; s. 3, ch. 91-431; s. 6, ch. 94-113; s. 1397, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 96-399; s. 36, ch. 99-2; s. 3, ch. 99-399; s. 16, ch. 2001-60; s. 4, ch. 2016-3; s. 13, ch. 2024-6; s. 7, ch. 2024-153.

F.S. 110.112 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.112 on Casetext

Amendments to 110.112


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 110.112
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 110.112.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 110.112

Total Results: 20

STATE OF FLORIDA v. LYONS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-09T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: requirements of law); cf. Brown v. State, 521 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 1988) ("Although the [S]tate might

LAURENTINA KOCIK, etc. v. JORGE FERNANDEZ

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-01-10T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: relinquished.” Torres v. K-Site 500 Assocs., 632 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Kocik argues that

VICTOR LAWRENCE PERDUE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-01-04T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: agree with Perdue. See Harris v. State, 674 So. 2d 110, 112-13 (Fla. 1996) (holding that a second-degree murder

STATE OF FLORIDA v. MICHAEL DELPRETE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-09-22T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: mandatory.” State v. Kalogeropolous, 758 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 2000). So long as discernable disputed facts

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2021-02-10T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: extent possible.” Bowen v. Willard, 340 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 1976). This rule implements that decision

Gerhard Hojan v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-12-02T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: 5th DCA 1982)); Barker v. Randolph, 239 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970) (explaining that the trial

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2020-10-29T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: extent possible.” Bowen v. Willard, 340 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 1976). This rule implements that decision

Megacenter US v. Goodman Doral 88th Court

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: . See Torres v. K-Site 500 Assocs., 632 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). There is sufficient evidence

State v. Espinoza

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 264 So. 3d 1055

Snippet: case." State v. Kalogeropolous, 758 So.2d 110, 112 (Fla. 2000). Thus, denial of the motion to dismiss

State v. Espinoza

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 264 So. 3d 1055

Snippet: case." State v. Kalogeropolous, 758 So.2d 110, 112 (Fla. 2000). Thus, denial of the motion to dismiss

Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. Florida State Board of Education

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2019-01-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 262 So. 3d 127

Snippet: Marrero v. Commonwealth , 559 Pa. 14, 739 A.2d 110, 112 (1999). However, as Petitioners point out, the

Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa v. Mark Farber, as limited etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-12-17T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: overruled on this issue. Bowen v. Willard, 340 So. 2d 110, 112 (Fla. 1976) (holding that “appeals taken from

Citizens for Strong Schools, Inc. v. Florida State Board of Education

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-12-17T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: rel. Tabalas v. Commonwealth of Penn., 739 A.2d 110, 112 (1999) (quoting Danson v. Casey, 399 A.2d 360

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Phil J. Marotta, etc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-04-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 214 So. 3d 590, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 410, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 744

Snippet: . Nat’l Solid Wastes Mgmt. Ass’n, 505 U.S. 88, 110, 112 S.Ct. 2374, 120 L.Ed.2d 73 (1992) (Kennedy, J.

John Patrick v. Richard Hess

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2017-02-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 212 So. 3d 1039, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 2017 WL 632259, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 337

Snippet: precedent.”); Pell v. State, 97 Fla. 650, 122 So. 110, 112 (1929) (explaining that "mere obiter dictum

Barton v. Capitol Preferred Insurance Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-12-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 208 So. 3d 239, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18168

Snippet: damages); Brookins v. Goodson, 640 So.2d 110, 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), disapproved on other

State v. Paez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 201 So. 3d 804, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14952

Snippet: to dismiss. State v. Kalogeropolous, 758 So.2d 110, 112 (Fla.2000). “In considering a [Florida Rule of

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Lourie

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-08-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 198 So. 3d 975, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12032, 2016 WL 4204042

Snippet: ’l Solid Wastes Mgmt. Ass’n, 505 U.S. 88, 110, 112 S.Ct. 2374, 120 L.Ed.2d 73 (1992)). First

State v. Barnes

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-04-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 189 So. 3d 362, 2016 WL 1718867, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6565

Snippet: ); see also State v. Kalogeropolous, 758 So.2d 110, 112 (Fla.2000) (“In meeting its burden of establishing

Shoemaker v. Sliger

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-02-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 187 So. 3d 863, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1975, 2016 WL 542861

Snippet: award. See Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So.2d 110, 112 (Fla.2002); see also § 55.03, Fla. Stat. (2014