Florida Statute 110.116 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 110.116

¹110.116 Personnel information system; payroll procedures.—

(1) The Department of Management Services shall establish and maintain, in coordination with the payroll system of the Department of Financial Services, a complete personnel information system for all authorized and established positions in the state service, with the exception of employees of the Legislature, unless the Legislature chooses to participate. The department may contract with a vendor to provide the personnel information system. The specifications shall be developed in conjunction with the payroll system of the Department of Financial Services and in coordination with the Auditor General. The Department of Financial Services shall determine that the position occupied by each employee has been authorized and established in accordance with the provisions of s. 216.251. The Department of Management Services shall develop and maintain a position numbering system that will identify each established position, and such information shall be a part of the payroll system of the Department of Financial Services. With the exception of employees of the Legislature, unless the Legislature chooses to participate, this system shall include all career service positions and those positions exempted from career service provisions, notwithstanding the funding source of the salary payments, and information regarding persons receiving payments from other sources. Necessary revisions shall be made in the personnel and payroll procedures of the state to avoid duplication insofar as is feasible. A list shall be organized by budget entity to show the employees or vacant positions within each budget entity. This list shall be available to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate upon request.

(2) In recognition of the critical nature of the statewide personnel and payroll system commonly known as People First, the Legislature finds that it is in the best interest of the state to continue partnering with the current People First third-party operator. The People First System annually processes 500,000 employment applications, 455,000 personnel actions, and the state’s $9.5-billion payroll. The Legislature finds that the continuity of operations of the People First System and the critical functions it provides such as payroll, employee health insurance benefit records, and other critical services must not be interrupted. Presently, the Chief Financial Officer is undertaking the development of a new statewide accounting and financial management system, commonly known as the Planning, Accounting, and Ledger Management (PALM) system, scheduled to be operational in the year 2026. The procurement and implementation of an entire replacement of the People First System will impede the timeframe needed to successfully integrate the state’s payroll system with the PALM system. In order to maintain continuity of operations and to ensure the successful completion of the PALM system, the Legislature directs that:

(a) The department, pursuant to s. 287.057(11), shall enter into a 3-year contract extension with the entity operating the People First System on January 1, 2024. The contract extension must:

1. Provide for the integration of the current People First System with PALM.

2. Exclude major functionality updates or changes to the People First System prior to completion of the PALM system. This does not include:

a. Routine system maintenance such as code updates following open enrollment; or

b. The technical remediation necessary to integrate the system with PALM within the PALM project’s planned implementation schedule.

3. Include project planning and analysis deliverables necessary to:

a. Detail and document the state’s functional requirements.

b. Estimate the cost of transitioning the current People First System to a cloud computing infrastructure within the contract extension and after the successful integration with PALM. The project cost evaluation shall estimate the annual cost and capacity growth required to host the system in a cloud environment.

The department shall develop these system specifications in conjunction with the Department of Financial Services and the Auditor General.

4. Include technical support for state agencies that may need assistance in remediating or integrating current financial shadow systems with People First in order to integrate with PALM or the cloud version of People First.

5. Include organizational change management and training deliverables needed to support the implementation of PALM payroll functionality and the People First System cloud upgrade. Responsibilities of the operator and the department shall be outlined in a project role and responsibility assignment chart within the contract.

6. Include an option to renew the contract for one additional year.

(b) The department shall submit, no later than June 30, 2026, its project planning and detailed cost estimate to upgrade the current People First System to the chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, the chair of the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee, and the Executive Office of the Governor’s Office of Policy and Budget, for preliminary review and consideration of funding the department’s Fiscal Year 2026-2027 legislative budget request to update the system.

History.—s. 20, ch. 79-190; s. 1, ch. 85-11; s. 15, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 40, ch. 2002-402; s. 4, ch. 2003-138; s. 115, ch. 2003-261; s. 1, ch. 2004-6; s. 59, ch. 2024-228.

¹Note.—Section 59, ch. 2024-228, amended s. 110.116 “in order to implement Specific Appropriations 2955 through 2964 of the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 General Appropriations Act, notwithstanding the proviso language for Specific Appropriation 2966 in chapter 2023-239, Laws of Florida.”

F.S. 110.116 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.116 on Casetext

Amendments to 110.116

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 110.116

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 110.116.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 110.116

Total Results: 12

Palm Beach Florida Hotel v. Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-07

Citation: 211 So. 3d 42, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18069

Snippet: (quoting Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So.2d 110, 116 (Fla. 2002) (Pariente, J., dissenting)). In all

Arizona Chemical Company, LLC v. Mohawk Industries, Inc., and Aladdin etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-18

Citation: 197 So. 3d 99, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10925, 2016 WL 3879252

Snippet: also Amerace Corp. v. Stallings, 823 So.2d 110, 116 (Fla.2002) (Pariente, J., dissenting) (opining

Joseph v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-07

Citation: 41 So. 3d 307, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9864, 2010 WL 2675311

Snippet: surrounding the interrogation. State v. Weiss, 935 So.2d 110, 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (citing Connor v. State, 803

Kessler v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-08

Citation: 991 So. 2d 1015, 2008 WL 4489200

Snippet: 4th DCA 2007) (citing State v. Weiss, 935 So.2d 110, 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)). Included among the Miranda

Meredith v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-09-12

Citation: 964 So. 2d 247, 2007 WL 2609392

Snippet: 598, 606 (Fla.2001); State v. Weiss, 935 So.2d 110, 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). The Miranda custody inquiry

Timmons v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-08-01

Citation: 961 So. 2d 378, 2007 WL 2189097

Snippet: subject to interrogation. State v. Weiss, 935 So.2d 110, 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Where either the custody

Smiley v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-06-07

Citation: 966 So. 2d 330, 2007 WL 1628111

Snippet: harm. See Pell v. State, 97 Fla. 650, 122 So. 110, 116 (1929). Although such examples of the right to

Weiand v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-03-11

Citation: 732 So. 2d 1044, 1999 WL 125522

Snippet: 827; Pell v. State, 97 Fla. 650, 665, 122 So. 110, 116 (1929); Danford v. State, 53 Fla. 4, 13, 43 So

ST. v. Falls Chase Spec. Taxing Dist.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-01-21

Citation: 424 So. 2d 787

Snippet: ") Carrollwood State Bank v. Lewis, 362 So.2d 110, 116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. den., 372 So.2d 467

Redondo v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-03-04

Citation: 380 So. 2d 1107

Snippet: harm. Pell v. State, 97 Fla. 650, 665, 122 So. 110, 116 (1929); Linsley v. State, 88 Fla. 135, 101 So

State v. County of Hillsborough

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-06-16

Citation: 182 So. 269, 132 Fla. 832

Snippet: 1935 12,000.00 91 to 110, 116 1936 21

Bevill v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1889-01-15

Citation: 25 Fla. 209

Snippet: and cases cited; Alston vs. Rowles, 13 Fla., 110, 116; Scarlett vs. Hicks Id., 314; Loring vs. Wittick