Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 110.124 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 110.124 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 110.124

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 110
STATE EMPLOYMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 110.124
110.124 Termination or transfer of employees aged 65 or older.
(1) An employee of the state who is within the Career Service System established by part II, or who is protected by any other merit system plan or system providing for tenure, may not be terminated by the agency or department in which he or she is employed solely because of attainment of age 65. Such employee may be terminated if the agency or department specifies charges or other cause for such termination. The attainment of age 65 or older shall not be considered as such specified cause for termination. If an employee continues in employment beyond age 65, the agency or department shall not be required to justify such continuation in employment.
(2) Whenever any employee who has attained age 65 is terminated by an agency or department solely because the employee attains age 65, the employee may apply for relief from the action to the Public Employees Relations Commission pursuant to s. 447.208. The employee shall continue in employment pending the outcome of the application. If the employee continues in employment following the decision of the commission, no further action shall be taken by the agency or department to terminate the employee for a period of 1 year following the date of the decision of the commission unless approved by the commission upon a showing by the agency or department that the employee’s capability has changed to a sufficient extent that he or she is no longer able to perform any job within such agency or department.
(3) Any employee who has attained age 65 may be transferred to some job requiring less responsibility and less arduous duties by the agency or department in which he or she is employed when determination is made that such employee is not able to satisfactorily carry out the full duties of his or her position. A transfer to a different position may be accompanied by an appropriate reduction in pay. Such transfer shall be subject to appeal by the employee.
(4) If mutually agreed to by the employee and the agency or department, an employee who has attained age 65 may be reduced to a part-time position for the purpose of phasing the employee out of employment into retirement. Such an arrangement may also be required by the Public Employees Relations Commission as part of its decision in any appeal arising out of this section. A reduction to a part-time position may be accompanied by an appropriate reduction in pay.
(5) In the event of transfer to another position or reduction to a part-time position, the agency or department concerned shall furnish, in writing, to the affected employee the reasons for the transfer or reduction, together with the name and classification of the employee concerned.
History.s. 21, ch. 79-190; s. 2, ch. 81-169; s. 73, ch. 86-163; s. 663, ch. 95-147; s. 6, ch. 96-399.

F.S. 110.124 on Google Scholar

F.S. 110.124 on Casetext

Amendments to 110.124


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 110.124
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 110.124.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 110.124

Total Results: 5

Treneka Simmonds v. Connor Perkins

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-06-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 247 So. 3d 397

Snippet: Michael H. v. Gerald D. , 491 U.S. 110 , 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333 , 105 L.Ed

Tijerino v. Estrella

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-04-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 843 So. 2d 984

Snippet: rights. See Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 105 L.Ed.2d 91 (1989)("[

Hayes v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-08-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 823 So. 2d 252, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11433, 2002 WL 1800701

Snippet: CURIAM. 1 Affirmed. See Francis v. State, 808 So.2d 110, 124-25 (Fla.2002). No. 3D01-1654 District

G.F.C. v. S.G.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-01-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 686 So. 2d 1382, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 245

Snippet: husband’s access. Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2338, 2342-43, 105 L.Ed.2d 91 (1989

Gfc v. Sg

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-01-23T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 686 So. 2d 1382

Snippet: #39;s access. Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 124, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 2342-43, 105 L.Ed.2d 91 (1989