Cases from cite.case.law:

CORMAN, v. JWS OF NEW MEXICO, INC. K. P., 356 F. Supp. 3d 1148 (D.N.M. 2018)

. . . So we're going to give you [$112.50]." . . .

IN RE WRIGHT, In In In In In In In In In In In In In Jr. In Jo In In, 591 B.R. 68 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2018)

. . . BK Billing collected $112.50 from Brown on September 15, 2017, September 29, 2017, and November 2, 2017 . . .

ACCOUNTABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC v. WELLNESS CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, LLC,, 333 F. Supp. 3d 1133 (D. Kan. 2018)

. . . 957 $337.50 $159.28 6294 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $3,367.50 $1,589.27 6295 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $112.50 . . . $53.09 6296 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $112.50 $53.09 6297 11/3/2015 12/18/2015 957 $60.00 $28.32 6298 . . . 2016 909 $6,225.00 $2,790.50 6517 12/21/2015 2/4/2016 909 $7.50 $3.36 6518 12/21/2015 2/4/2016 909 $112.50 . . . 2016 4/20/2016 833 $45.00 $18.49 6902 3/6/2016 4/20/2016 833 $7.50 $3.08 6903 3/6/2016 4/20/2016 833 $112.50 . . .

IN RE GRASSO,, 586 B.R. 110 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2018)

. . . Trustee Motion to Convert or Dismiss for failure to file Monthly Operating Reports 0.3 375 $112.50 7/ . . . Callahan of Trustee's Office re: selection process 0.3 375 $112.50 10/23/12 E-mail to J. . . . Trustee appointing Christine Shubert as Chapter 11 Trustee 0.3 375 $112.50 10/31/12 Reviewed e-mail from . . . Kile on behalf of NexTier Bank 0.3 375 $112.50 8/28/12 Telephone Conference with B. . . . Kile, Esquire negotiation on NexTier Claim to be Secured/Cash Collateral 0.3 375 $112.50 8/28/12 Telephone . . .

BECKWITH, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 254 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . per hour $46,599.15 Roberta Gambale 4.5 hours at $378 per hour $1701.00 David Proctor 3.5 hours at $112.50 . . .

MCNEIL, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 233 F. Supp. 3d 150 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Therefore, the Court holds that $112.50 an hour is the appropriate upper limit for paralegal services . . .

LANCE COAL CORPORATION Co. v. W. CAUDILL, 655 F. App'x 261 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . $2,962.50; and 0.75 hours by attorney Rachel Wolfe at the requested rate of $150.00/hour, for a total of $112.50 . . .

JOAQUIN, v. FRIENDSHIP PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL,, 188 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Ostrem: $110.63 (2013-2014), $112.50 (2014-2015), and $124.50 (2015-20 Í 6); Mr. . . . ), $165.93 for 2013-2014 travel (3 hours at $55,31 per hour), $1091,25 for 2014-2015 (9.7 hours'at $112.50 . . .

KELLY A F, a v. WENGLER, 822 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2016)

. . . fee cap for attorneys working on prison litigation suits translates into a maximum hourly rate of $112.50 . . .

TAYLOR, D. T. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 187 F. Supp. 3d 46 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . USAO Laffey rate for paralegals, which is $108.75/hour (2013-2014 Laffey rate) [for 3.7 hours] and $112.50 . . .

s CINTR N- RIVERA, v. W. COLVIN,, 244 F. Supp. 3d 273 (D.P.R. 2015)

. . . The ALJ deducted (1) 112.50 for transportation, (2) $15.00 for medication, (3) .$450 for payments to . . .

TILLMAN, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 123 F. Supp. 3d 49 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . rate of $108.75 (three-quarters of $145) for work performed from June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014, and $112.50 . . .

HERNANDEZ v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY,, 306 F.R.D. 279 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Second, CFMG seeks to limit “damages for alleged attorney’s fees” to $112.50 per hour, pursuant to the . . .

In ROSARIO v. LLC, In In N. L. In A. In M. In In K., 493 B.R. 292 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2013)

. . . Evans, 413 B.R. at 329 ($160); Rojero, 399 B.R. at 920 ($170 fee); Carrier, 363 B.R. at 252, 257 ($112.50 . . . Schneider, 271 B.R. 761, 765 (Bankr.D.Vt.2002) ($30 per hour); Landry, 268 B.R. at 308 ($75 per hour or $112.50 . . .

In P. IANNINI, P. v. I C P. A. LLC, P LLC, U. S. GMAC, NCO U. S. M. P. J., 460 B.R. 676 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . One-half of that amount is $360 (fee of $112.50 times 3.2 hours). . . . Adding the $528.75 allowed for the 4.7 hours billed at half the hourly rate ($112.50) the allowed amount . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH, Sr., 456 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2011)

. . . assistance of Patricia Waldron, an employee of Smith’s Auto Sales, Davis requested and received a $112.50 . . .

In JHA,, 461 B.R. 611 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . The attorneys fees associated with the amendment to Debtor’s plan total $112.50. . . .

UNITED STATES v. KNOX,, 634 F.3d 461 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . fine because the court found that he was unable to pay the interest on the fíne and the interest on a $112.50 . . .

In WILSON, v. ABS I, 442 B.R. 10 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2010)

. . . that these include undocumented foreclosure fees and costs of $5,784.62, property inspection fees of $112.50 . . .

In W. HORNUNG L., 425 B.R. 242 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2010)

. . . , each month the Debtors spend $443.88 for utilities, $37.50 for homeowners’ association dues, and $112.50 . . .

MALLETIER, v. APEX CREATIVE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,, 687 F. Supp. 2d 347 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . total payment received and appears to be missing a second page; (2) a purchase made by LVM totaling $112.50 . . . calculated as follows: Original Total: $21,130.26 Invoice No. 0204-21 $ 1,050.50 Invoice No. 0504-13 $ 112.50 . . .

In ENERGY PARTNERS, LTD., 422 B.R. 68 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Run reflects that the personnel of F & J who provided services for Birch Run spent, in the aggregate, 112.50 . . . F & J charged Birch Run a total of $61,480.40, which includes $60,047.50 for 112.50 hours of work by . . . Of the 112.50 hours, much of this time was spent drafting and prosecuting the Birch Run Objection; there . . . using the twelve factors set forth in Johnson. i.Time and Labor Required As already noted, F & J spent 112.50 . . .

In PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. v. LP,, 582 F.3d 156 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . per unit [to AstraZeneca] over the last two years, and 3) [a constant published] price ... that is $112.50 . . .

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GRAFMAN, a k a a k a a k a AI, d b a a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a a k a AAA- RAA Al A To Z NY, IVB KLM PC, PC, PC, PC, LLC, Of NY, PC, PC, PC LLC, PCs J., 655 F. Supp. 2d 212 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Upon receipt of documentation that the massager cost $75, plaintiff then paid the defendant retailer $112.50 . . .

MONSANTO COMPANY, v. L. STRICKLAND,, 604 F. Supp. 2d 805 (D.S.C. 2009)

. . . Id. at p. 7-12 (net income of $112.50 per acre). Dr. . . . reasons, the Court finds that is appropriate to assume that hypothetical negotiation would start at $112.50 . . .

In BURZEE, v., 402 B.R. 8 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . The Debtor’s paychecks reflect a deduction of $112.50 per pay period for a “401k.” . . .

RABUCK, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,, 522 F. Supp. 2d 844 (W.D. Mich. 2007)

. . . invoice from University Disability Consortium to Hartford in the amount of $1,125.00 consisting of a $112.50 . . .

In PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION., 491 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D. Mass. 2007)

. . . revenue per unit over the last two years, and 3) we are still maintaining our price at a level that is $112.50 . . .

ATKINSON, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES, 479 F.3d 222 (3d Cir. 2007)

. . . Under the PLRA, fees would be limited to $112.50 per hour. 527 U.S. at 348-50,119 S.Ct. 1998. . . .

ARMITAGE v. DOLPHIN PLUMBING MECHANICAL, LLC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 763 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . 33.75 July 17, 2003 $720.00 48.00 60.00 July 24, 2003 $840.00 56.00 120.00 July 30, 2003 $825.00 55.00 112.50 . . . 21, 2003 $877.50 58.50 138.75 August 28, 2003 $877.50 58.50 138.75 September 1, 2003 $825.00 55.00 112.50 . . . September 18, 2003 $862.50 57.50 131.25 October 2, 2003 $870.00 58.00 135.00 October 9, 2003 $825.00 55.00 112.50 . . .

In DIMAS, LLC,, 357 B.R. 563 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . Analysis re 0.50 facts and issues. 112.50 04/25/02 D. . . . call 0.30 to A1 Reuter regarding status of settlement agreement and content of settlement agreement. 112.50 . . . Reuter an electronic message attaching pleadings. 112.50 _TOTAL_ 9.70 3,047.00 _EXHIBIT 4 Date Timekeeper . . . Finley was received. 112.50 12/13/05 J. . . . Rakitin and her various requests. 112.50 12/13/05 J. . . .

In CARRIER, S. v., 363 B.R. 247 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . The reasonable fee for preparation of these documents is $112.50. . . . The Court determined in In re Landry II that $75.00 per hour, or a total of $112.50 for 1.5 hours, was . . . A fee of $112.50 is reasonable for the Debtor’s case. . . . Disgorgement by the Defendants of all fees received from the Debtor in excess of $112.50 is appropriate . . . The reasonable value of their services was $112.50. . . .

YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 73 Fed. Cl. 249 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . increase, Yankee Atomic would have had a total of 337.50 assemblies picked up by end of 2001 (225 plus 112.50 . . .

In FIBERMARK, INC., 349 B.R. 385 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2006)

. . . To the extent Obuchowski seeks approval of the $112.50 disallowed in connection with Obuchowski’s Second . . . However, upon review of the record, $112.50 of those requested fees were disallowed (doc. # 1340). . . .

HEM, v. MAURER,, 458 F.3d 1185 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . District of Michigan were paid a maximum of $75 an hour, the PLRA permitted payment of no more than $112.50 . . .

COMBS, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 459 F.3d 640 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . As a result, attorneys who worked on behalf of the prisoners were only entitled to $112.50 per hour. . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. ANSON STAMPING CO. INC., 426 F. Supp. 2d 579 (W.D. Ky. 2006)

. . . O’Connor, Jr., Construction La%v, § 20:112.50 (West 2005)(“The use of the word ‘may’ in the ... statutory . . .

In B. KLEIN,, 328 B.R. 597 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Amato is entitled to the amount of $300.00 for attorney fees rendered and $112.50 for paralegal fees . . .

FIRESTINE v. PARKVIEW HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., 374 F. Supp. 2d 658 (N.D. Ind. 2005)

. . . 1.0 185.00 185.00 10/27/04 10 4.0 225.00 900.00 10/27/04 17 .6 185.00 111.00 11/10/04 10 .5 225.00 112.50 . . .

HADIX v. M. JOHNSON F. P. Jr. I., 398 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . the defendants claimed that the maximum allowable fee for work performed prior to May 1, 2002, was $112.50 . . . district court ruled in favor of the defendants, calculating the plaintiffs’ attorney fees at a rate of $112.50 . . .

In ROSE, E. a k a a k a, 314 B.R. 663 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2004)

. . . B.R. at 308 (allowing $75.00 per hour, with a cap of one and one-half hours, for a maximum fee of $112.50 . . .

In ESSENTIAL THERAPEUTICS, INC., 308 B.R. 170 (Bankr. D. Del. 2004)

. . . . $112.50 $375.00 Nestor 10-Sep YCST Teleconference.. .re: obieciions to Equity Committee retention applications . . . Committee motion to adjourn $112.50 $375.00 0.3 Nestor 3-Sep YCST Correspondence ... re:,,. . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. SMITH,, 866 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 2004)

. . . However, Smith was not able to arrange a payment plan for the additional service charges of $112.50. . . .

JOHNSON, v. M. DALEY,, 339 F.3d 582 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . court before this increase, so the CJA maximum at the time was $75, and the PLRA maximum therefore was $112.50 . . .

BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC. v. LORENZO d b a DJ IRV, 255 F. Supp. 2d 795 (M.D. Tenn. 2003)

. . . /14/02 RHF 11 $ 2,475.00 10/14/02 MTC 5.7 $ 427.50 11/27/02 RHF 79.30 $17,842.50 11/27/02 MTC 1.5 $ 112.50 . . .

ARMSTRONG A. v. DAVIS,, 318 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2003)

. . . Defendants were correct, the result would be that attorney’s rates in this case would be limited to $112.50 . . .

PARKER, v. J. SCHILLING,, 287 B.R. 391 (W.D. Ky. 2002)

. . . Baxter Schilling (“Schilling”) a fee of $112.50 and expenses of $8.02. The debt- or, Ken W. . . .

ROBERTS, v. INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTOR CO., 242 F. Supp. 2d 850 (D. Or. 2002)

. . . The Court, therefore, disallows Plaintiffs request for $112.50 in fees for the 0.5 hours billed by Stevens . . .

In LANDRY, In R. v., 268 B.R. 301 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . Burnworth’s services in each case is $112.50 (1.5 hours x $75.00/ hour). . . . Burnworth is entitled to a reasonable fee of $112.50 and must return to the debtor $162.50 ($275.00 - . . . $112.50 = $162.50), the amount overpaid by the debt- or. . . . Burnworth similarly is entitled to a reasonable fee of $112.50 and must return to the debtor $137.50 . . . ($250.00 — $112.50 = $137.50), the amount overpaid by the debtors. . . .

GORDON, v. J. PRINCIPI,, 15 Vet. App. 124 (Vet. App. 2001)

. . . from the Social Security Administration, and had monthly expenses that exceeded her monthly income by $112.50 . . .

SALLIER, v. SCOTT,, 151 F. Supp. 2d 836 (E.D. Mich. 2001)

. . . fee cap for attorneys working on prison litigation suits translates into a maximum hourly rate of $112.50 . . . Consequently, Plaintiff Counsel’s maximum hourly rate allowable under the PLRA is 150% of $75/ hour, or $112.50 . . . At a rate of $112.50/ hour, the maximum amount that Pláintiff may recover for post-trial attorney fees . . . is $8,122.50 (72.2 hours x $112.50/hour). . . .

CARBONELL, v. C. O. ACRISH,, 154 F. Supp. 2d 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . entitled to more than $22,500.00 in attorneys’ fees, whether at his normal billing rate or at the PLRA’s $112.50 . . . Criminal Justice Act attorneys [is] $75 per hour,” and thus Section 1997e(d)(3) limits the hourly rate to $112.50 . . .

In P. M. I. TRADING LIMITED v. FARSTAD OIL, INC., 160 F. Supp. 2d 613 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . Francesca Morris O O OH OO t> o co $ 3050.27 oo On CO LQ rH C/3 os 05 h $ 150.00 Marc Antonecehia 07 $ 112.50 . . .

In MAY,, 261 B.R. 770 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . clothing-allowance of $50.00, cost of transportation of $60.00 and additional expenses for dental of $112.50 . . .

MORRISON, v. DAVIS,, 195 F. Supp. 2d 1019 (S.D. Ohio 2001)

. . . fees, and (2) that the hourly-rate for the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), should be set at $112.50 . . . The Plaintiffs argument that the Judicial Conference has established a rate of $112.50 per hour (150% . . . Assuming, arguendo, that this Court were to find that the $112.50 rate has been universally adopted, . . . Even if $112.50 is the proper rate, it was not the proper rate when the Plaintiffs attorney performed . . . The Court therefore DENIES the Plaintiffs Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment to reflect a flat $112.50 . . .

XIAO- YUE GU, v. HUGHES STX CORPORATION,, 127 F. Supp. 2d 751 (D. Md. 2001)

. . . follows: Hours Rate Total Jeffrey Bernbach, Esq. 194.5 $225.00 $ 43,762.50 § 2(f)(iii) allowance 6.0 $112.50 . . .

In TOY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. FSB,, 256 B.R. 1 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . 89 731.25 10/25/89 581.25 10/25/89 116.25 11/20/89 1,406.25 11/20/89 731.25 11/20/89 562.50 11/20/89 112.50 . . .

HADIX, v. M. JOHNSON,, 230 F.3d 840 (6th Cir. 2000)

. . . Section 803(d)(3) thus caps the attorney fee recoverable at $112.50 per hour (150% of the $75.00 maximum . . .

In CROWN OIL, INC., 257 B.R. 531 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2000)

. . . And Objection 112.50 hrs. - $13,536.00 Pee/Employment Applications 5.10 hrs. - $ 612.00 Financing 15.70 . . .

MARISOL A. Dr. FORBES, Jr. v. W. GIULIANI,, 111 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . Delone 150.00 112.50 16,875.00 A. Gilbert 150.00 51.80 7,770.00 R. . . .

In PETERSON, v. U. S., 251 B.R. 359 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2000)

. . . Bachman indicated that the original request had contained an error and overstated the amount due by $112.50 . . .

K. WOLFF, v. E. MOORE,, 104 F. Supp. 2d 892 (S.D. Ohio 2000)

. . . . § 3006A(d)(l), or $112.50 per hour. . . . Section 3006A(d)(l) sets the maximum hourly rate at $75. 150% of 75 is $112.50. . . . .

LOZEAU, v. LAKE COUNTY, MONTANA,, 98 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (D. Mont. 2000)

. . . Plaintiffs seek a rate of $112.50 per hour for Mr. Pevar. The Court is mindful that Mr. . . .

ILICK, v. MILLER,, 68 F. Supp. 2d 1169 (D. Nev. 1999)

. . . As a result, the proper PLRA rate of pay is $112.50 per hour. B. . . . As to fees billed after that date, the flat rate of $112.50 per hour established by the PLRA applies. . . . Instead, the court reached this figure by comparing the post-PLRA hourly rate for attorneys ($112.50) . . . Balaban, Eric 00.00 No o O 0 00 0 o 135.00 93-PLRA oo 05 0 GO CO 0 o 112.50 Post-PLRA 1 o W <3 CO <3 . . . Evans, Donald No Charge 00.00 00.00 00.00 Pre-PLRA 124.20 125.00 $ 15,525.00 Post-PLRA 64.85 112.50 $ . . .

MADRID, v. GOMEZ, M. D., 190 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 3006A(d)(l). 150% of $75 is $112.50. . . . Thus, when the PLRA applies, the maximum allowable rate is $112.50 per hour, as compared to the rates . . .

WALKER, v. BAIN,, 65 F. Supp. 2d 591 (E.D. Mich. 1999)

. . . This leads to a PLRA ceiling, under § 1997e(d)(3) of $112.50 ($75.00 times 150%), which is greater than . . .

D. M. v. TERHUNE,, 67 F. Supp. 2d 401 (D.N.J. 1999)

. . . The current hourly rate under §. 3006(A) in the District of New Jersey is $75, which comes to $112.50 . . .

CHATIN, v. P. COOMBE, Jr. D. K. F. Lt. P. J. NYS, 186 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1999)

. . . Pursuant to the PLRA, the court limited counsel’s hourly rate to $112.50, substantially less than the . . . undisputed that prisoners’ attorneys in the Southern District of New York are limited to a maximum rate of $112.50 . . .

MARTIN, DIRECTOR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. HADIX, 527 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1999)

. . . objected, arguing that § 808(d) limits all fees awarded after April 26, 1996, in these litigations to $112.50 . . . fee cap for attorneys working on prison litigation suits translates into a maximum hourly rate of $112.50 . . .

WORLDCOM, INC. LDDS v. AUTOMATED COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 75 F. Supp. 2d 526 (S.D. Miss. 1999)

. . . 8.75 @ $150.00 = $1312.50 MPM 16.0 @ $80.00 = $1280.00 JKC 1.0 @ $50.00 = $50.00 MAG 2.25 @ $50.00 = $112.50 . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. KALINOWSKI, C. O. C. O. I C. O. II, 146 F.3d 196 (3d Cir. 1998)

. . . Alternatively, Hernandez argues that the applicable rate for Love’s time should be $112.50 an hour. . . . per hour for both in- and out-of-court time, and applying the 150% limitation results in a rate of $112.50 . . .

MADRID, v. GOMEZ, M. D. MADRID, v. GOMEZ, M. D. T. K., 150 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 1998)

. . . Therefore, the maximum hourly rate payable for awards made after April 26, 1996, is $112.50, rather than . . . See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d)(l). 150% of $75 is $112.50. . . . Thus, when the PLRA applies, the maximum allowable rate is $112.50 per hour, as compared to the rates . . . emphatically states: "No award of attorney’s fees ... shall be based on an hourly rate greater than [$112.50 . . .

SMART SMR OF NEW YORK, INC. d b a v. ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF STRATFORD,, 9 F. Supp. 2d 143 (D. Conn. 1998)

. . . hearing preparation) - 2.25 hours (50% reduction for time spent on complaint) 2.25 total hours x $50 $112.50 . . .

HADIX, v. M. JOHNSON, UNITED STATES v. STATE OF MICHIGAN,, 144 F.3d 925 (6th Cir. 1998)

. . . illustrative purposes only, that the PLRA would cap the maximum hourly rate for attorney fees in this ease at $112.50 . . .

HADIX, v. M. JOHNSON,, 143 F.3d 246 (6th Cir. 1998)

. . . Capping attorney fees at $112.50 (which represents 150% of the $75 maximum) would reduce plaintiffs’ . . .

GLOVER M. v. JOHNSON, R. G. K. Jr. B. Jr. L. Jr. s s, 138 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 1998)

. . . § 1997e(d)(l)(A) & (B)(ii), and second, that the plaintiffs should be limited to an hourly rate of $112.50 . . .

ABOU- KHADRA, v. G. BSEIRANI, AGB G. BSEIRANI, AGB v. T. MAHSHIE,, 971 F. Supp. 710 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . 300.00 Peebles 50.5 203 $150.00 7.575.00 $30,450.00 Andrus 8.25 $150.00 1,237.50 Berman 0.75 12 $150.00 112.50 . . . 75.00 $ 37.50 $ 37.50 PARALEGAL: Kaestner 69 $ 25.00 $ 862.50 $ 862.50 LAW CLERK: Liddell $ 25.00 $ 112.50 . . . $ 112.50 1989 Hours: 8.25 1989 Fees: $ 22,563.13 $23,328.13 1988 PARTNERS: Pfohl 0.25 7.5 $125.00 500.00 . . .

BLISSETT, v. CASEY, A. R. N., 969 F. Supp. 118 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . In addition, she is seeking $4,528.13 for 40.25 hours of travel time at the rate of $112.50 per hour, . . . District for travel time, the court will not award attorney Smith the higher requested hourly rate of $112.50 . . .

ALEXANDER S. S. B. M. M. S. A. a a v. BOYD, E. F. P. W. J. P. W. v. A. HARPOOTLIAN, DAVIS, S. S. B. M. M. S. A. a a v. BOYD, A. E. F. P. W. J. P. W., 113 F.3d 1373 (4th Cir. 1997)

. . . As the majority points out, plaintiffs do not dispute that the rate under the PLRA is $112.50. . . . Although the state does not concede that plaintiff's counsel’s hourly rate should be set at $112.50, . . . Plaintiffs do not dispute the State's computation that the maximum rate is $112.50 per hour under 42 . . .

HADIX C. Jr. E. D. Al A. v. M. JOHNSON F. P. I. KNOP II T. v. M. JOHNSON Jr. W., 965 F. Supp. 996 (W.D. Mich. 1997)

. . . Accordingly, the hourly rate for which plaintiffs’ counsel may be compensated if the PLRA is applied is $112.50 . . . Court now turns to the question of whether reducing plaintiffs’ attorneys’ billing rate from $150 to $112.50 . . . plaintiffs have a settled expectation to reasonable attorneys’ fees, the Court must determine whether $112.50 . . .

In COLLINS, 210 B.R. 538 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1997)

. . . He further seeks approval of professional fees in the amount of $112.50 for services performed as attorney . . . the title of real property within the Debtors’ estate and he incurred attorney fees in the amount of $112.50 . . .

HADIX, v. M. JOHNSON,, 947 F. Supp. 1113 (E.D. Mich. 1996)

. . . Under the PLRA, their rate would be reduced to $112.50 per hour (150% of the $75 maximum hourly rate . . . Changing the rate from $150 to $112.50 per hour, according to plaintiffs, is a drastic reduction over . . . ’s cap is 150% of that amount, I cannot say that Congress’s intent to limit plaintiffs’ counsel to $112.50 . . . for work performed between January 1, 1996 and June 30,1996 in which counsel’s fees are limited to $112.50 . . .

EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a a a a s a v. CHRISTOPHER, E. G. A., 942 F. Supp. 597 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

. . . Floum 58.75 5/7/92 [Gunther] ' 112.50 5/19/92. J.R. . . . 620.00 6/19/92 [Gunther] 281.25 6/22/92 [Rusineck] 387.50 6/23/92 [Rusineck] 620.00 6/23/92 [Gunther] " 112.50 . . . 450.00 10/2/92 [Rusineck] 620.00 10/3/92 [Gunther] 1,125.00 10/5/92 [Rusineck] 310.00 10/6/92 [Gunther] 112.50 . . . 225.00 11/9/92 [Gunther] 225.00 11/10/92 [Gunther] 562.50 11/11/92 [Gunther] 56.25 11/15/92 [Gunther] 112.50 . . . Sivas 512.50 11/23/92 [Gunther] 112.50 11/30/92 [Gunther] 112.50 12/4/92 [Gunther] 112.50 12/14/92 [Rusineck . . .

a a a a s a v. E. G. A., 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1221 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1996)

. . . Floum 58.75 5/7/92 [Gunther] 112.50 5/19/92 J. R. . . . 620.00 6/19/92 [Gunther] 281.25 6/22/92 [Rusineck] 387.50 6/23/92 [Rusineck] 620.00 6/23/92 [Gunther] 112.50 . . . 235.00 7/24/92 [Gunther] 337.50 7/24/92 [Rusineck] 387.50 7/27/92 [Rusineck] 77.50 8/20/92 [Gunther] 112.50 . . . ] 225.00 mm2 [Gunther] 225.00 11/10/92 [Gunther] 562.50 11/11/92 [Gunther] 56.25 11/15/92 [Gunther] 112.50 . . . Sivas 512.50 11/23/92 [Gunther] 112.50 11/30/92 [Gunther] 112.50 12/4/92 [Gunther] 112.50 12/14/92 [Rusineck . . .

LUCIANO, v. OLSTEN CORPORATION, N. J., 925 F. Supp. 956 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . Goodman should be reimbursed for the 61 hours she reports as travel time at the rate of $112.50/hour. . . . Goodman is entitled to the following compensation: 61.00 hours @ $112.50/hour — $ 6,862.60 590.16 hours . . .

In JUNCO, INC. In PRESS, JONES WAECHTER, P. C. In SPRINGFIELD CONTRACTING CORPORATION,, 185 B.R. 215 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995)

. . . for Court, prepare for, travel to, and attend hearing on Application for Compensation BIS 1.25 $90 $112.50 . . .

In POSEIDON POOLS OF AMERICA, INC., 180 B.R. 718 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . SS .25 40.00 This is not a legal service. 8/7/92 PREPARE LETTER — C.O.S/CERTIFICATE OF SER- NS 1.50 112.50 . . . 8/19/92 PREPARE ENVELOPES — MAILING NS 1.50 112.50 What did the mailing pertain to? II. . . . /17/92 TRAVEL TO EDNY TO FILE ORDER GRANTING IF FEE APPLICATION 1.50 105.00 3/31/92 TO EDNY AC 1.50 112.50 . . .

In L. NORTH, 33 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

. . . Iran-Contra hearings: 5/18/87 - $ 37.50 Draft letter to Committee Chairman 5/19/87 - 6/2/87 - $ 18.75 $ 112.50 . . .

ELECTRIC INSURANCE COMPANY v. RUBIN RUBIN v. RUBIN, 32 F.3d 814 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . 18, 1993, included a charge of $60.00 for two automobiles, and the total premium for that year was $112.50 . . .

Jo DeFRANCESCO, P. DeFRANCESCO, v. SULLIVAN,, 803 F. Supp. 1332 (N.D. Ill. 1992)

. . . Sullivan, 799 F.Supp. 888 (N.D.Ill. 1992) (August 1992 award at $112.50 rate); McPhan v. . . . August 21, 1992) (August 1992 award at $112.50 rate); Butts v. . . .

LINDNER, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 799 F. Supp. 888 (N.D. Ill. 1992)

. . . As a further fallback position, Linder suggests a $112.50 hourly rate based on the “all items” increase . . . Lindner suggests an “all items” increase to $112.50 using a January 1992 benchmark. . . . The $112.50 figure is in line with the rates awarded in Butts, Uskokovic and Kidd, and is therefore accepted . . .

WEINBERGER, v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP. BTZ, INC. v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP. RYAN, v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP., 801 F. Supp. 804 (D. Me. 1992)

. . . Rnrlrp & Wpinstpirv 11/8 1 11/12 .75 12/8 2.0 Total 3.75 X $220 = $825.00 11/8 .75 Total .75 X $150 = $112.50 . . .

In RUSTY JONES, INC., 143 B.R. 499 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1992)

. . . administrative expenses) = $23 million -5- $150 million in claims = 15% dividend x $750 claim = dividend of $112.50 . . .

In A. JOHNSON, A. JOHNSON v. LOMAS MORTGAGE USA, INC., 140 B.R. 850 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1992)

. . . following transactions in 1991: Post Date Date Due Total Payment Transaction Description 1/16/91 1/15/91 -112.50 . . .

FLOWERS, v. C. PHELPS, v. JOHNSON,, 956 F.2d 488 (5th Cir. 1992)

. . . The magistrate also reduced the proffered hourly rate from $125 to $112.50. . . .

VOIGHT, v. SUBARU- ISUZU AUTOMOTIVE, INC., 141 F.R.D. 99 (N.D. Ind. 1992)

. . . constitute the claimed $759.25: Court Reporter Transcript Costs —Lee Ashton $285.00 —Craig Edward Mikes 112.50 . . .

CAMACHO, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 758 F. Supp. 91 (D.P.R. 1991)

. . . $2,981.25 for 39.75 hours of legal work at the statutory rate of $75 per hour, plus the amount of $112.50 . . .

In CODY, GLC C H, 122 B.R. 520 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990)

. . . Schandel’s rate of $75.00 per hour for his services, amounts to a total of $112.50 which should be deducted . . .

MARKETING SPECIALISTS, INC. v. V. BRUNI, d b a, 129 F.R.D. 35 (W.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . Cost to Bruni $112.50; Exh. . . .

W. v. A. v., 93 T.C. 529 (T.C. 1989)

. . . transfer of the Gore stock to % Increase over Date Share value prior value 3/31/77 $48.50 - - - 3/31/78 112.50 . . . 131.96 1/17/79 175.00 55.56 1/24/80 4,950.00 3/31/78 112.50 131.96 1/17/79 175.00 55.56 1/24/80 4 2 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)