|
|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
F.S. 112.534112.534 Failure to comply; official misconduct.—(1) If any law enforcement agency or correctional agency, including investigators in its internal affairs or professional standards division, or an assigned investigating supervisor, intentionally fails to comply with the requirements of this part, the following procedures apply. For purposes of this section, the term “law enforcement officer” or “correctional officer” includes the officer’s representative or legal counsel, except in application of paragraph (d).(a) The law enforcement officer or correctional officer shall advise the investigator of the intentional violation of the requirements of this part which is alleged to have occurred. The officer’s notice of violation is sufficient to notify the investigator of the requirements of this part which are alleged to have been violated and the factual basis of each violation. (b) If the investigator fails to cure the violation or continues the violation after being notified by the law enforcement officer or correctional officer, the officer shall request the agency head or his or her designee be informed of the alleged intentional violation. Once this request is made, the interview of the officer shall cease, and the officer’s refusal to respond to further investigative questions does not constitute insubordination or any similar type of policy violation. (c) Thereafter, within 3 working days, a written notice of violation and request for a compliance review hearing shall be filed with the agency head or designee which must contain sufficient information to identify the requirements of this part which are alleged to have been violated and the factual basis of each violation. All evidence related to the investigation must be preserved for review and presentation at the compliance review hearing. For purposes of confidentiality, the compliance review panel hearing shall be considered part of the original investigation. (d) Unless otherwise remedied by the agency before the hearing, a compliance review hearing must be conducted within 10 working days after the request for a compliance review hearing is filed, unless, by mutual agreement of the officer and agency or for extraordinary reasons, an alternate date is chosen. The panel shall review the circumstances and facts surrounding the alleged intentional violation. The compliance review panel shall be made up of three members: one member selected by the agency head, one member selected by the officer filing the request, and a third member to be selected by the other two members. The review panel members shall be law enforcement officers or correctional officers who are active from the same law enforcement discipline as the officer requesting the hearing. Panel members may be selected from any state, county, or municipal agency within the county in which the officer works. The compliance review hearing shall be conducted in the county in which the officer works. (e) It is the responsibility of the compliance review panel to determine whether or not the investigator or agency intentionally violated the requirements provided under this part. It may hear evidence, review relevant documents, and hear argument before making such a determination; however, all evidence received shall be strictly limited to the allegation under consideration and may not be related to the disciplinary charges pending against the officer. The investigative materials are considered confidential for purposes of the compliance review hearing and determination. (f) The officer bears the burden of proof to establish that the violation of this part was intentional. The standard of proof for such a determination is by a preponderance of the evidence. The determination of the panel must be made at the conclusion of the hearing, in writing, and filed with the agency head and the officer. (g) If the alleged violation is sustained as intentional by the compliance review panel, the agency head shall immediately remove the investigator from any further involvement with the investigation of the officer. Additionally, the agency head shall direct an investigation be initiated against the investigator determined to have intentionally violated the requirements provided under this part for purposes of agency disciplinary action. If that investigation is sustained, the sustained allegations against the investigator shall be forwarded to the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission for review as an act of official misconduct or misuse of position. (2)(a) All the provisions of s. 838.022 shall apply to this part. (b) The provisions of chapter 120 do not apply to this part. History.—s. 4, ch. 74-274; s. 35, ch. 77-104; s. 1, ch. 78-291; s. 4, ch. 82-156; s. 4, ch. 93-19; s. 3, ch. 2000-184; s. 8, ch. 2003-158; s. 3, ch. 2009-200; s. 5, ch. 2011-4; s. 6, ch. 2016-151.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 112.534
Total Results: 14
415 So. 2d 62
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1982 | Docket: 1512947
Cited 27 times | Published
mandamus, injunctive relief, in reliance on Section 112.534. This section operates only to immediately
772 F. Supp. 583, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12703, 1991 WL 179694
District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1991 | Docket: 2419824
Cited 15 times | Published
persuasive of its own right. Florida Statutes § 112.534 expressly sets forth the remedies available for
544 So. 2d 1162, 1989 WL 63381
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1989 | Docket: 1286150
Cited 13 times | Published
outside complaints made against an officer. Section 112.534 specifies that if an agency fails to comply
516 So. 2d 1125, 1987 WL 3010
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1987 | Docket: 1677954
Cited 11 times | Published
(1983), is injunctive relief as provided in Section 112.534, Florida Statutes (1983), and accordingly reverse
644 So. 2d 1368, 1994 WL 531272
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 1672155
Cited 8 times | Published
112.532 is injunctive relief provided for in section 112.534. See, e.g., Sylvester v. City of Delray Beach
584 So. 2d 214, 1991 WL 158570
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1991 | Docket: 466951
Cited 4 times | Published
founded solely on subsection (3). Additionally, section 112.534 provides injunctive relief to officers in cases
446 So. 2d 1152, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12183
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1984 | Docket: 1767433
Cited 3 times | Published
in her complaint for injunction pursuant to Section 112.534, Rule 9.100(c) does not apply.
Although appellant
650 F. Supp. 2d 1157, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57983, 2009 WL 1928194
District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2009 | Docket: 2378896
Cited 2 times | Published
§ 112.532 is entirely erroneous as Fla. Stat. § 112.534 makes it clear that injunctive relief is the only
51 So. 3d 489, 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1009, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18677, 2010 WL 4829816
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2010 | Docket: 2407832
Cited 1 times | Published
a complaint, as that language was used in section 112.534, Florida Statutes (1981), *494meant its receipt
659 So. 2d 295, 1994 WL 704797
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1994 | Docket: 1462652
Cited 1 times | Published
Rights. Fla. Stat. § 112.534.
Defendants correctly point out that section 112.534 is the exclusive remedy
148 So. 3d 798, 2014 WL 4695131
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 1315680
Published
availability of compliance review hearings under section 112.534, Florida
Statutes, 1 to review alleged intentional
53 So. 3d 1238, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2062
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2011 | Docket: 60298049
Published
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 112.534(1), Fla. Stat. (2009).
53 So. 3d 1238, 2011 WL 613523
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2011 | Docket: 2408194
Published
WELLS, and SUAREZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 112.534(1), Fla. Stat. (2009).
394 So. 2d 1053, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18769
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1981 | Docket: 64580809
Published
timely enforcement of those rights pursuant to Section 112.534, Florida Statutes (1977).1 Cf. West v. State
