Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 117.107 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 117.107 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 117.107

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 117
NOTARIES PUBLIC
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 117.107
117.107 Prohibited acts.
(1) A notary public may not use a name or initial in signing certificates other than that by which the notary public is commissioned.
(2) A notary public may not sign notarial certificates using a facsimile signature stamp unless the notary public has a physical disability that limits or prohibits his or her ability to make a written signature and unless the notary public has first submitted written notice to the Department of State with an exemplar of the facsimile signature stamp. This subsection does not apply to or prohibit the use of an electronic signature and seal by a notary public who is registered as an online notary public to perform an electronic or online notarization in accordance with this chapter.
(3) A notary public may not affix his or her signature to a blank form of affidavit or certificate of acknowledgment and deliver that form to another person with the intent that it be used as an affidavit or acknowledgment.
(4) A notary public may not take the acknowledgment of or administer an oath to a person whom the notary public actually knows to have been adjudicated mentally incapacitated by a court of competent jurisdiction, where the acknowledgment or oath necessitates the exercise of a right that has been removed pursuant to s. 744.3215(2) or (3), and where the person has not been restored to capacity as a matter of record.
(5) A notary public may not notarize a signature on a document if it appears that the person is mentally incapable of understanding the nature and effect of the document at the time of notarization.
(6) A notary public may not take the acknowledgment of a person who does not speak or understand the English language, unless the nature and effect of the instrument to be notarized is translated into a language which the person does understand.
(7) A notary public may not change anything in a written instrument after it has been signed by anyone.
(8) A notary public may not amend a notarial certificate after the notarization is complete.
(9) A notary public may not notarize a signature on a document if the person whose signature is being notarized does not appear before the notary public either by means of physical presence or by means of audio-video communication technology as authorized under part II of this chapter at the time the signature is notarized. Any notary public who violates this subsection is guilty of a civil infraction, punishable by penalty not exceeding $5,000, and such violation constitutes malfeasance and misfeasance in the conduct of official duties. It is no defense to the civil infraction specified in this subsection that the notary public acted without intent to defraud. A notary public who violates this subsection with the intent to defraud is guilty of violating s. 117.105.
(10) A notary public may not notarize a signature on a document if the document is incomplete or blank. However, an endorsement or assignment in blank of a negotiable or nonnegotiable note and the assignment in blank of any instrument given as security for such note is not deemed incomplete.
(11) A notary public may not notarize a signature on a document if the person whose signature is to be notarized is the spouse, son, daughter, mother, or father of the notary public.
(12) A notary public may not notarize a signature on a document if the notary public has a financial interest in or is a party to the underlying transaction; however, a notary public who is an employee may notarize a signature for his or her employer, and this employment does not constitute a financial interest in the transaction nor make the notary a party to the transaction under this subsection as long as he or she does not receive a benefit other than his or her salary and the fee for services as a notary public authorized by law. For purposes of this subsection, a notary public who is an attorney does not have a financial interest in and is not a party to the underlying transaction evidenced by a notarized document if he or she notarizes a signature on that document for a client for whom he or she serves as an attorney of record and he or she has no interest in the document other than the fee paid to him or her for legal services and the fee authorized by law for services as a notary public.
History.s. 7, ch. 91-291; s. 4, ch. 92-209; s. 749, ch. 95-147; s. 19, ch. 95-280; s. 8, ch. 98-246; s. 33, ch. 2006-178; s. 5, ch. 2019-71.

F.S. 117.107 on Google Scholar

F.S. 117.107 on Casetext

Amendments to 117.107


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 117.107
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 117.107.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 117.107

Total Results: 5

Kim Braddock v. City of Port Orange Pension Fund

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-02

Snippet: notarized. See § 12 117.107(9), Fla. Stat. (2016). Steven Braddock filed the

JEFFREY SCHEIBLE, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JANICE JOHNSON v. AUDLEY LIVINGSTON BROWN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-02-09

Snippet: 05(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). Further, section 117.107(9) provides that “[a] notary public may not notarize

Imerys Talc Am., Inc. v. Ricketts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-19

Citation: 262 So. 3d 799

Snippet: jurisdiction over the *808defendant"); id. at 117, 107 S.Ct. 1026 (Brennan, J., concurring in part and

Imerys Talc Am., Inc. v. Ricketts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-19

Citation: 262 So. 3d 799

Snippet: jurisdiction over the *808defendant"); id. at 117, 107 S.Ct. 1026 (Brennan, J., concurring in part and

State v. Sailer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-12-07

Citation: 645 So. 2d 1114, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11873, 1994 WL 682771

Snippet: receiving an acknowledgment of a signature. See § 117.107, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992). This act is not to be undertaken