The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . . §§ 122.28, 122.29; and/or any potentially applicable general permit. 3. . . .
. . . . § 122.29 (discussed below) and one of two other requirements: the structure must use either (1) “a . . . A “new source” under section 122.29 is a facility that (1) “is constructed at a site at which no other . . . Section 122.29(b) provides further that, in determining whether a facility is “substantially independent . . . Compare id. with § 122.29 (defining “new source” as including a facility that undertakes “processes . . . . The Phase I Rule defines each by reference to the “substantial independence” test of section 122.29(b . . .
. . . . § 122.29(a)(2). If a source is designated as a “new source,” then it must adhere to the NSPS. . . . . § 122.29(b)(1). . . . . § 122.29(b)(1), then the construction is generally classified as a “modification” and is not subject . . . completely adopted the three criteria from the general definition in Part 122 (compare 40 C.F.R. § 122.29 . . . Despite the unchanged language from § 122.29(b)(l)(iii) to § 430.01(j)(l)(iii), Industry Petitioners . . .
. . . . §§ 122.29(c)(3), 122.44(d)(9) and 122.49(g), on the grounds that they unlawfully assert a power to . . . Their assertions of power are oddly qualified. 40 C.F.R. § 122.29(c)(3) provides that: [t]he Regional . . . 40 C.F.R. § 122.49(g) (calling for consideration of EIS-related permit conditions as provided in § 122.29 . . . Accordingly, the challenged regulations, 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.29(c)(3), 122.44(d)(9), 122.49(g), cannot stand . . . In 40 C.F.R. §§ 122.29(c)(3) and 122.-44(d)(9), the agency appeared to exclude effluent limitations from . . .
. . . . § 122.29(d)(1). . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 122.29(d)(2)(i). . . . . § 122.29(c)(5). . . . Id. § 122.29(c)(4)(i). The construction ban is attacked by both Industry and NRDC. . . . See 40 C.F.R. § 122.29(d)(2). . . .
. . . . § 122.29(b). . . . C.F.R. §§ 6.604(a), 122.29(c)(1), and 122.21(k)(3). . . . the construction results in a change in the nature or quantity of pollutants discharge. 40 C.F.R. § 122.29 . . .
. . . does not object, that the sum of $45 should be paid out of the estate since, the trustee collected $122.29 . . .
. . . The plaintiff recovered on account of those notes a total sum of $122.29 at an expense of $58.33, leaving . . .
. . . stating the account at the Treasury the accounting officers stated a set-off and make a deduction of $122.29 . . . time, fifteen days, allowed for transit from his post of duty, Port au Prince, to the United States.$122.29 . . . The demurrer is overruled, and judgment will be entered for the claimant for the sum of $122.29, with . . .