The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 130
COUNTY BONDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 130.11

130.11 Bond trustees.—

(1) Unless otherwise provided by law, when the county commissioners shall have issued bonds, as aforesaid, they shall appoint by resolution of their board, to be recorded in the minutes, a financial committee of three persons, who shall be resident freeholders of the county, to be styled “trustees of county bonds,” who shall each give bond running to the chair of the board of county commissioners and the chair’s successors in office, with sufficient securities, in such sums as may be required by the county commissioners, conditioned that the said trustee shall faithfully discharge the trust confided to him or her, and shall pay over and duly account for all such sums of money as may come into his or her hands by virtue of such trust, which said bonds shall be approved as to the form and the sufficiency of sureties by the board of county commissioners; and the county commissioners may, from time to time, as circumstances may require, demand additional security from any such trustees; or

(2) The commissioners may in like manner appoint a responsible trust company, organized and qualified to do business, under the laws of the state, with its principal place of business in such county, which shall be styled, “trustee for county bonds,” and which shall give bond running to the chair of the board of county commissioners and the chair’s successors in office, with sufficient securities in such sum as may be required by the county commissioners, conditioned that the said trustee shall faithfully discharge the trust confided to it and shall pay over and duly account for all such sums of money as may come into its hands, by virtue of such trust, which said bond shall be approved as to form and the sufficiency of sureties by the county commissioners and the county commissioners may from time to time, as circumstances may require, demand additional security from any such trustee.

(3) The county commissioners may, if they so elect, by resolution recorded in the minutes of said board, waive the requirement of a bond of such trust company, when appointed trustee of county bonds, and take and accept in lieu thereof a bond in the usual form conditioned upon the proper accounting for all moneys deposited in said trust company and the moneys received by said trust company as trustee of county bonds shall be held by it as money deposited in any other county depository and the bond required of it as such depository shall secure the proper accounting for said moneys, which bond shall be approved by the board of county commissioners as to form, amount and sufficiency of sureties.

History.—s. 13, ch. 2088, 1877; RS 603; GS 799; s. 1, ch. 7337, 1917; RGS 1544; s. 1, ch. 12425, 1927; CGL 2322; s. 7, ch. 22858, 1945; s. 833, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 130.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 130.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 130.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 130.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 130.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

GUSTAVSON, v. WRIGLEY SALES COMPANY, Wm. Jr. LLC,, 961 F. Supp. 2d 1100 (N.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . . § 130.11, which governs “[l]abel designations of ingredients for standardized foods” generally, expressly . . . Mars points out that Section 130.11 was added in 1993 precisely because the NLEA added a requirement . . . Because Section 130.11 permits Mars to use the term “milk chocolate” on the front of its packages without . . . The FAC makes no reference to Section 130.11, and Gustavson offers no explanation as to how her standard . . .

A. PRONSOLINO J. A. J. v. NASTRI, s a a A. v. s a a v., 291 F.3d 1123 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 130.11(d)(1) (1975); id. (1974); id. (1973). . . . . § 130.11(d)(2) (1975); id. (1974); id. (1973). . . .

MORIN v. H. TRUPIN, BLAIKIE, v. H. TRUPIN,, 711 F. Supp. 97 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . true facts concerning the subject transactions, the Morins made payments to Rothschild Realty Partners 130.11 . . .

In ANNIS ANNIS v. FIRST STATE BANK OF JOPLIN A., 78 B.R. 962 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1987)

. . . See 1 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 1.19, pp. 130.0, 130.11, n. 18 (14th ed. 1978) ("Schedules have universally . . . ” the case authorities have held the schedules inadmissible. 1 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 1.19, p. 130.11 . . .

F. BERNSTEIN, v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,, 730 F.2d 987 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . February 15 and 27, 1978, three Frigitemp checks to Bell — in the amounts of $1,748.25, $699.24, and $130.11 . . .

F. BERNSTEIN, v. SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,, 730 F.2d 987 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . February 15 and 27, 1978, three Frigitemp checks to Bell — in the amounts of $1,748.25, $699.24, and $130.11 . . .

In BRIARBROOK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, H. CLAY, v. TRADERS BANK,, 11 B.R. 515 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1981)

. . . See 1 Collier on Bankruptcy para. 1.19(4), p. 130.11 (1978), to the following effect: “Ordinarily the . . .

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC. v. M. COSTLE, U. S. C. L. A. A., 439 F. Supp. 980 (E.D.N.Y. 1977)

. . . which is considered a candidate for section 208 planning (which has since been accomplished), CPP § 130.11 . . .

CALIFORNIA MOLASSES COMPANY, v. CALIFORNIA AND HAWAIIAN SUGAR COMPANY,, 551 F.2d 1230 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . . § 130.11. . . .

ASHLAND OIL REFINING COMPANY, a a v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT, 343 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . This assumption was based upon Section 130.11 of the contract specifications which provides: “When direct . . . Appel-lee’s reasoning, however, is erroneous because Section 130.11 has no application to the contract . . .

LOCAL GRAPHIC ARTS INTERNATIONAL UNION, v. EMPLOYING PRINTERS ASSOCIATION, 416 F. Supp. 769 (S.D. Iowa 1976)

. . . . § 130.11 (1974). . . . to accomplish these goals were to be applied voluntarily and on a self-administered basis, 6 C.F.R. 130.11 . . .

JENNINGS v. P. SHULTZ,, 355 F. Supp. 1198 (D.D.C. 1973)

. . . . § 130.11, 38 Fed. Reg. 1480 (Jan. 12, 1973). . . .

TRUST CO. OF AMERICA v. CHICAGO, P. ST. L. RY. CO. OF ILLINOIS RAMSEY v. STEAD,, 199 F. 593 (S.D. Ill. 1912)

. . . Renewals ................A 130.11 70.71 59.90 46.04 45. . . .