The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 130
COUNTY BONDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 130.12

130.12 Collector to pay taxes to trustees or other officials or boards.—All money collected to pay the interest, or for a sinking fund of said bonded debt, shall be paid over by the tax collector, or person receiving the same on account of taxes collected or property sold therefor, to the said trustees, or to the other officials or boards to whom may have been transferred by law the duties and obligations formerly devolving upon said trustees, and the said trustees, or the said other officials or boards to whom may have been transferred by law the duties and obligations formerly devolving upon said trustees, are required to pay out of the moneys so received the interest of said county bonds, and to invest the residue in the bonds aforesaid, or if the said bonds cannot be had at par or at such premium as to said trustees or to the said other officials or boards to whom may have been transferred by law the duties and obligations formerly devolving upon said trustees, may seem reasonable and just, then such residue may be invested in United States, state, county or municipal bonds bearing interest; or in the event such bonds cannot be acquired to advantage, such funds shall be deposited in the savings department of national banks or state banks of the state, or savings banks organized and existing under the laws of this state, at the prevailing rate of interest, to be held as an accumulating fund for the ultimate redemption of said county bonds.

History.—s. 14, ch. 2088, 1877; RS 604; GS 800; s. 1, ch. 6473, 1913; RGS 1545; CGL 2323.

F.S. 130.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 130.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 130.12

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 130.12

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 130.12.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

C. HAHN, Jr. v. C. HAHN,, 66 So. 3d 345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . By contrast, the former husband’s financial affidavit reflected a monthly deficit of $130.12 before paying . . .

CITY OF NORTH LITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, 808 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (E.D. Ark. 2011)

. . . to the left; thence along said curve to the left, a chord bearing and distance of S 83°57' 31" West 130.12 . . .

SPARTON CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 89 Fed. Cl. 190 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . DX-130.12. . . .

BOONE, v. BOONE,, 3 So. 3d 403 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . financial affidavit reflected Social Security income of $747 and expenses of $877.12, for a deficit of $130.12 . . .

In E. KRAUSE, S. v., 349 B.R. 255 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006)

. . . Description February March April Monthly Average Utilities Gas 396.12 315.85 197.94 303.30 Electric 130.12 . . .

NOVO NORDISK A S, v. BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY,, 96 F. Supp. 2d 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . See MPEP § 130.12. . . .

UNITED STATES v. UNDETERMINED QUANTITIES OF CLEAR PLASTIC BAGS OF AN ARTICLE OF DRUG FOR VETERINARY USE WRM- RID, 963 F. Supp. 641 (S.D. Ohio 1997)

. . . . § 130.12(a)(5)(ii)(c)). . . .

In ROBLIN INDUSTRIES, INC. E. LAWSON, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 78 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1996)

. . . (citing 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1.19[5], at 130.12 (14th ed. 1974))). . . .

In ROBLIN INDUSTRIES, INC. E. LAWSON, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 78 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 1996)

. . . (citing 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1.19[5], at 130.12 (14th ed. 1974))). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOXES OF CAFERGOT P- B SUPPOSITORIES,, 721 F. Supp. 1462 (D. Mass. 1989)

. . . and reports lacking the details which permit scientific evaluation will not be considered.” 21 CFR § 130.12 . . .

B. KLEIN, JNT v. N. TABATCHNICK S., 610 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . cert. denied, 379 U.S. 966, 85 S.Ct. 661, 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965); 1 Collier on Bankruptcy § 1.19 at 130.12 . . .

B. KLEIN, JNT v. N. TABATCHNICK S., 610 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir. 1979)

. . . cert. denied, 379 U.S. 966, 85 S.Ct. 661, 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965); 1 Collier on Bankruptcy § 1.19 at 130.12 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARTICLES OF FOOD AND DRUG CONSISTING OF COLI- TROL FEED GRADE, ENTROL- S MEDICATED, ENTROL- P,, 518 F.2d 743 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 130.12. . . .

EDISON PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC. v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, W., 513 F.2d 1063 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . double-blind cross-over and randomnization techniques or any other kind of control specified in 21 CFR 130.12 . . . There are other grounds as well which are described below. . 21 C.F.R. § 130.12(a)(5)(ii)(a). . 21 C.F.R . . . . § 130.12(a)(5)(ii)(c). . . . For example, § 130.12(a)(5)(ii)(a)(2)(i) requires that the plan or protocol for the study include a method . . . FDA has made much of the fact that petitioner never requested a waiver under 21 C.F.R. § 130.12(a)(5) . . .

STERLING DRUG, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER, M., 384 F. Supp. 557 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)

. . . . § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (1973) and accordingly denied the request for a hearing. . . .

STERLING DRUG INC. v. W. WEINBERGER, M., 503 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . drug’s effectiveness stemming from adequate and well-controlled clinical investigations, 21 C.F.R. 130.12 . . . Miller-Paez and Cohen studies were not adequate and well-controlled under the standards of 21 C.F.R. 130.12 . . . denial of approval, and as soon as practicable in the case of withdrawal of approval.” . 21 C.F.R. 130.12 . . . ae-cepted at face value as is required in ruling upon the adequacy of a request for hearing under 21 C.F.R. 130.12 . . .

COOPER LABORATORIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER, FEDERAL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION,, 501 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 130.12(a)(5) (April 1, 1973). . . . R. § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (c). . . . . § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (a) (3)' & (4). . Dr. Paul E. . . . F.R. § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (a) (4). . . . R. § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (a) (4)1. . . . . § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (a) (4) (ii). . 21 CJBYR. § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (a) (4) (iii). . H. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARTICLES OF FOOD AND DRUG COLI- TROL MEDICATED,, 372 F. Supp. 915 (N.D. Ga. 1974)

. . . recognition based upon substantial scientific evidence as delineated in the regulatory guidelines. 21 CFR § 130.12 . . .

E. R. SQUIBB SONS, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER, C., 483 F.2d 1382 (3d Cir. 1973)

. . . . §§ 130.12(a) (5) and 130.14. . 21 CFR § 130.12(a) (5) (ii). . . . . the type of data, the absence of which justifies summary judgment. . 21 U.S.C. § 355(e). . 21 CFR § 130.12 . . . CFR § 130.12(a)(5). . 21 U.S.C. § 355(e) (1) and (2). . . .

F. BRADLEY v. W. WEINBERGER,, 483 F.2d 410 (1st Cir. 1973)

. . . . § 130.12. See Hynson, supra. . . .

WEINBERGER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, v. HYNSON, WESTCOTT DUNNING, INC., 412 U.S. 609 (U.S. 1973)

. . . Id., § 130.12 (a)(5)(ii)(a). . . . Id., § 130.12 (a) (5) (ii) (b). . . . Id., § 130.12 (a) (5) (ii) (c). . . . Reg. 7251, amending 21 CFR §§ 130.12 (a) (5) and 130.14. Section 505 (e) as amended, 21 U. S. . . . Title 21 CFR § 130.12 (a)(5) as amended, 35 Fed. . . . . § 355 (d), even as that term is defined in the Commission’s regulations. 21 CFR §130.12 (a)(5). . . .

JENNINGS v. P. SHULTZ,, 355 F. Supp. 1198 (D.D.C. 1973)

. . . . § 130.12, id. . . .

BRISTOL LABORATORIES, v. L. RICHARDSON,, 456 F.2d 563 (1st Cir. 1971)

. . . . § 130.12(a) (5) requires as a prerequisite to a hearing. . . . Nor did Bristol conform with the testing protocol requirements of 21 CFR § 130.12(a) (5), issued on May . . .

CIBA- GEIGY CORPORATION, a v. L. RICHARDSON, Dr. C., 446 F.2d 466 (2d Cir. 1971)

. . . . §§ 130.12, 130.14. . . .

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION, v. L. RICHARDSON, C., 328 F. Supp. 612 (D. Del. 1971)

. . . See 35 Fed.Reg. at 7251-7252; codified in 21 CFR § 130.12(a) (5) (ii). . . .

UPJOHN COMPANY, v. H. FINCH, L. Jr., 422 F.2d 944 (6th Cir. 1970)

. . . Section 130.12(a) (5) is revised to read as follows: § 130.12 Refusal to approve the application. . . . characteristics of uncontrolled and inadequately controlled clinical investigations are described in § 130.12 . . .

PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, v. H. FINCH, L. Jr., 307 F. Supp. 858 (D. Del. 1970)

. . . The criteria set forth in § 130.12(a) (5) (ii) (a) of the September regulations provide for controls . . .

GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE COMPANY, a v. UNITED STATES, 216 F. Supp. 181 (W.D. Mo. 1963)

. . . the definition of the scope of the tax contained in the regulations issued in March, 1942, Section 130.12 . . .