The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Penal Law §§ 130.20, 130.45 ; see also Crim. Record at *2-3. . . .
. . . . §§ 130.05(3)(a), 130.20(1), 130.25(2) (West 1998) Texas Tex. . . .
. . . Penal Law §§ 130.20-50 (forms of rape, sexual misconduct, and criminal sexual acts, including forced . . . similar challenge by filing a superseding indictment which cited specific statutes: New York Penal Law §§ 130.20 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 130.20 (defining sexual misconduct as a sexual act committed “with another person without . . .
. . . Penal Law § 130.20. . . .
. . . Class A _Misdemeanor_ PL 120.20 Reckless Endangerment in the 200 _Degree — Class A Misdemeanor_ PL 130.20 . . .
. . . him removable, in that his conviction for sexual misconduct pursuant to New York Penal Law (“NYPL”) § 130.20 . . . under the categorical approach employed in reviewing statutes of conviction and, further, that section 130.20 . . . While NYPL § 130.20(1), pursuant to which Ganzhi had been convicted, contains no reference to the age . . . this statute would be considered removable, while others may not be,” the IJ concluded that section 130.20 . . . Section 130.20(1) provides that a person is guilty of sexual misconduct when “[h]e or she engages in . . .
. . . Penal Law § 130.20 on May 25, 2006, and was sentenced to one year of incarceration. . . .
. . . reconsideration and ordering attorney’s fees in the amount of $26,796.00 and costs in the amount of $130.20 . . .
. . . Weinstein and Margaret Berger, Weinstein’s Federal Evidence, § 130.20[5], p. 103-39 (Joseph M. . . . Weinstein at § 130.20[4], p. 103-38.1. . . .
. . . . § 130.20(1)). . . .
. . . . § 130.20. The purpose of the fee is to reimburse the government for the costs incurred. . . .
. . . ijntercourse with an underage female is, of course, criminal conduct ([New York] Penal Law §§ 130.05(2), (3), 130.20 . . .
. . . Kansas Civil Pattern Instruction 130.20 (3rd ed.) (2003). . . .
. . . . § 130.20. . . .
. . . This charge was based on Douglas’ 1992 conviction under New York State Penal Law Section 130.20 for “ . . . Having determined that the Section 130.20 of the New York Penal Code is a divisible statute that covers . . . the IJ ruled that the DHS failed to establish through evidence that Douglas’ conviction under Section 130.20 . . . Dec. 991 (BIA 1999), Douglas’ conviction falls within the portion of New York Penal Law Section 130.20 . . . New York State Penal Law Section 130.20, at the time of Douglas' conviction, stated: A person is guilty . . .
. . . Penal Law § 130.20 (McKinney 2004); Wisc.Stat.Ann. § 940.225(3) (West 1996 & Supp.2003). . . .
. . . . § 130.20(j). . . .
. . . . § 130.20). Antidegradation policies under the CWA are split into three tiers. . . .
. . . chlorine in the absence of catalysts to form Ch2ClCCl3 (1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane, I-130A) which boils at 130.20 . . .
. . . chlorine in the absence of catalysts to form Ch2ClCCl3 (1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane, I-130A) which boils at 130.20 . . .
. . . to the effect that the cost of incarceration, supervision and electronic monitoring would total $41,-130.20 . . .
. . . Thomas—130.20 hours x $115/hour.$14,973.00 J. Druff—175.30 hours X $85/hour.$14,900.50 E. . . .
. . . . § 130.20(a)(4), and the appellate division accepted jurisdiction pursuant to the same section. . . . Section 130.20 states in pertinent part; (a) An appeal may be taken by the government from any of the . . . because we find that in applying Guam law this appeal is not authorized by § 130.20(a)(4). . . . Because neither 8 G.C.A. § 130.20(a)(4) nor any other provision of § 130.20(a) expressly authorizes the . . . The full text of § 130.20(a) is set forth supra at p. 5302. . . . . See 8 G.C.A. 130.20(a)(4); People v. . . . judgment is not such an order, and as a result the government’s appeal is not permitted by section 130.20 . . .
. . . Instead, Guam relies on 8 Guam Code Annotated § 130.20(a)(3). . . . There are two problems with Guam’s reliance on section 130.20. . . . If appellee is correct, the portions of section 130.20(a), including subsection (a)(3), that go beyond . . . We hold that even if section 130.20 is valid, it does not authorize the government to appeal from an . . . Therefore, we hold that, even if section 130.20 is still valid, it does not authorize the prosecutor . . .
. . . Benbow 1978 $542.50 $130.20 Daniel W. Cass, Jr., and Barbara L. Cass 1978 $811.00 294.00 Daniel W. . . .
. . . Proc.Code § 130.20(a) (1977). The present case raises a different issue, however. . . . Before we can consider whether the Guam legislature intended section 130.20(a) to authorize appeals from . . . Section 130.20(a) of the Guam Criminal Procedure Code thus cannot provide the express statutory authority . . . Guam Crim.Proc.Code § 130.20(a) (1977) provides that: An appeal may be taken by the government from any . . . statute authorizing Government appeals within its Code of Criminal Procedure, see Guam Crim.Proc.Code § 130.20 . . .
. . . Code § 130.20(a) (1977) purports only to authorize appeals to the District Court of Guam. . . . Section 130.20(a) thus does not provide the “express statutory authority” required for a government appeal . . . Code § 130.20(a) (1977), authorizing the government to bring appeals to the District Court in certain . . . Code § 130.20(a) (1977) provides that: An appeal may be taken by the government from any of the following . . . Code § 130.20(a) (1977) should be extended to cover appeals from the District Court of Guam, adoption . . .
. . . Subsection (6) is added to Section 130.20(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code 'to read: ‘Subsection (6) . . .
. . . CPP §§ 130.20, 130.21. . . .
. . . Nunez then said, “The fare to Corpus Christi, Texas, and back is $130.20 . . . ” Apparently anticipating . . .
. . . plaintiffs challenge, on equal protection and federal supremacy grounds, the constitutionality of § 130.20 . . . to counsel, confrontation of witnesses, etc.) as well as their attack on the constitutionality of § 130.20 . . . On its face, § 130.20(c) of the New York Code of Military Justice, under which plaintiffs herein were . . . Similar doubts exist as to the constitutionality of § 130.20(b) of the New York Code of Military Justice . . . Even this earlier provision, however, contained no distinction, such as is found in § 130.20(b), between . . .
. . . Sections 130.20, 130.21, and 130.22. . . . In Section 130.20, supra, the statutory history of the tax is mentioned. . . . “SEC. 130.20 Effective Period.- — The tax on the transportation of crude petroleum and liquid products . . .
. . . the Internal Revenue Act were substantially modified and now appear as Treasury Regulations 42, Secs. 130.20 . . . through 130.26, promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code: “Sec. 130.20. . . . Jones, 10 Cir., 176 F.2d 519; and now appear as Regulations 42, Sections 130.20 through 130.26. . . .
. . . -5-10 418.50 128859... 5-24-06 4-27-10 338.25 285922. 11-20-06 4-5-10 474.75 70863— 3-24-09 5-10-10 130.20 . . .
. . . Alabama operates a railroad from West Point, Ga., through Montgomery, Ala., to Selma, Ala., a distance of 130.20 . . .