Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 132.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 132.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 132.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 132
GENERAL REFUNDING LAW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 132.01
132.01 How chapter may be cited.This chapter may be cited as the “General Refunding Law.”
History.s. 1, ch. 15772, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2383(1).

F.S. 132.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 132.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 132.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 132.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 132.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE BODRICK, M. v. A., 558 B.R. 848 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2016)

. . . parties (or their privies)[], whether on the same or a different claim.” 18 Moore’s FEDERAL Practice § 132.01 . . .

BLAKE, v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES, INC., 962 F. Supp. 2d 141 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Blake here relies on the School Safety and Security Contracting Procedures Act (SSSCPA), D.C.Code §§ 5-132.01 . . .

RED RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 91 Fed. Cl. 621 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01[2] (3d ed. 2008) (“Generally, the doctrine of issue preclusion . . .

CUMBERLAND CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 82 Fed. Cl. 500 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01[2] (3d ed.2008). . . .

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SORRELL, 549 U.S. 158 (U.S. 2007)

. . . Pattern Instr. 3d, Civ., No. 132.01 (2005) (railroad liable when injury “results in whole or in part” . . . commentary to these instructions cites cases and instructions applying a single standard, id., No. 132.01 . . .

VALENCIA- ALVAREZ, v. R. GONZALES,, 469 F.3d 1319 (9th Cir. 2006)

. . . See 18 James Wm.Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 132.01 [1] (3d ed.2006). . . .

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,, 394 F. Supp. 2d 600 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . See 18 Moore's Federal Practice § 132.01. . . .

H. JOHNS, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION IBM, 361 F. Supp. 2d 184 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Pract. 3d, § 132.01[4][c], The decision complained of does not meet that description. . . .

STONE, v. DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION, a, 296 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (D. Colo. 2003)

. . . Moore et ah, Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01[4][b] (3d ed.1999) (“[o]n all- too many occasions, the . . . Moore et ah, Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01[4][b] (3d ed.1999). . . .

VENEGAS- HERNANDEZ, v. PEER,, 283 F. Supp. 2d 491 (D.P.R. 2003)

. . . MooRE et al., MooRe’s Federal Practice ¶ 132.01 (3d ed.2000). . . .

M. J. WOODS, INC. v. CONOPCO, INC. d b a s USA Co. d b a USA LLP,, 271 F. Supp. 2d 576 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01[2], at 132-11 (3d ed. 2001) (“When an issue of fact or . . .

F. POSTLEWAITE, S. v. MCGRAW- HILL, INC., 333 F.3d 42 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . Telephone Co., 56 N.Y.2d 11, 17, 451 N.Y.S.2d 11, 13, 436 N.E.2d 461 (1982); 18 Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01 . . .

ZAMBRANO v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, 282 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Practice 3d § 132.01[2] (“When an issue of fact or law is actually litigated and determined by a valid . . .

SUMMERVILLE, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., 219 F.3d 855 (8th Cir. 2000)

. . . Moore et. al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 132.01 (3d ed.1997). . . .

S. MOLLOY, v. PRIMUS AUTOMOTIVE FINANCIAL SERVICES,, 247 B.R. 804 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2000)

. . . cause of action involving a party (or privy) to the prior litigation.” 18 Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01 . . .

M. ESTABROOK, v. UNITED STATES,, 41 Fed. Cl. 283 (Fed. Cl. 1998)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 132.01[2] (3d ed. 1998). . . .

FITZROY GARDINER, d b a WESTERN TRADING ENTERPRISES v. VIRGIN ISLANDS WATER POWER AUTHORITY VIRGIN ISLANDS WATER POWER AUTHORITY, v. THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY THE ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY,, 39 V.I. 519 (3d Cir. 1998)

. . . privity with them; this does not appear to include the United States. 18 Moore's Federal Practice, § 132.01 . . .

GARDINER, d b a v. VIRGIN ISLANDS WATER POWER AUTHORITY VIRGIN ISLANDS WATER POWER AUTHORITY, v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, 145 F.3d 635 (3d Cir. 1998)

. . . privity with them; this does not appear to include the United States. 18 Moore's Federal Practice, § 132.01 . . .

J. HERBERT v. J. REINSTEIN,, 976 F. Supp. 331 (E.D. Pa. 1997)

. . . between the parties, whether of the same or a different claim. 18 Moore’s Federal Practice Digest § 132.01 . . .

WISCONSIN CENTRAL LIMITED, a d b a CP a d b a CN a v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN, a L. A. J., 95 F.3d 1359 (7th Cir. 1996)

. . . Several provisions of those rules are pertinent to this appeal: PSC 132.01 Purpose- (2) These rules shall . . . Code § PSC 132.01(2). . . .

SHAYER, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, St. C. Jr. St. M. O H. OVERSCHMIDT, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. St. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, St. NAACP, v. BOND, C. MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, Dr. Mr. L. v. BOND, C., 541 F. Supp. 922 (W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . Tract 130.01 88 Census Tract 130.02 2,266 Census Tract 130.03 5,028 Census Tract 131 3,582 Census Tract 132.01 . . .

M. MORRIS d b a v. UNITED STATES, 331 F. Supp. 200 (S.D. Ill. 1971)

. . . 111.65 100.23 2nd Q. 1964 395.45 98.86 82.76 3rd Q. 1964 644.33 161.08 125.17 4th Q. 1964 736.39 184,10 132.01 . . .

MEREDITH v. CITY OF WINTER HAVEN, 141 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1944)

. . . . § 132.01 et seq. . . .