Florida Statute 132.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

Chapter 132
GENERAL REFUNDING LAW

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 132.02

132.02 Taxing units may refund obligations.—

(1) Each county, municipality, school district, or other taxing district in this state, herein sometimes called a unit, may issue, pursuant to a resolution or resolutions of the governing body thereof (meaning thereby the board or body vested with the power of determining the amount of tax levies required for taxing the taxable property of such unit for the purpose of such unit) and either with or without the approval of such bonds at an election, except as may be required by the Constitution of the state, bonds of such unit for the purpose of refunding any or all bonds, coupons, or interest on any such bonds, now or hereafter outstanding, or any other funded debt, all of which are herein referred to as bonds, whether such unit created such indebtedness or has assumed, or may become liable therefor.

(2) In the event any such unit having outstanding bonded or other funded debt shall have been, or shall hereafter be, abolished otherwise than by annexation to, or consolidation with, a like political subdivision or district, the territory within such unit shall be deemed to be a taxing district within the meaning of this chapter, and the board of county commissioners of the county wherein such abolished unit, or any part thereof, is situate, or the governmental authority having power or authority to levy a tax for the retirement of the indebtedness to be refunded, shall be the governing body thereof, and may issue refunding bonds in behalf of such unit for the purpose of refunding its outstanding indebtedness, and may provide for the annual levy of ad valorem taxes without limitation as to rate or amount fully sufficient to pay principal of and interest on such refunding bonds, the tax to be levied on the same property which would have been taxable for payment of the outstanding indebtedness had such taxing unit not been abolished or dissolved.

(3) If the territory of such abolished unit lies in more than one county, the territory in each county shall be deemed to be a taxing district in such county and the board of county commissioners of each county within which any of such territory is situate, or the governmental authority having power or authority to levy a tax for the retirement of the indebtedness to be refunded, may issue refunding bonds as herein provided for the purpose of refunding such portion of the indebtedness of the abolished unit as shall be chargeable against the territory in said county; provided, however, that nothing in this section shall affect or limit the powers of the State Board of Administration in the issuance of refunding bonds under s. 16, Art. IX of the State Constitution of 1885 as adopted by the State Constitution or under s. 9, Art. XII of the State Constitution.

History.—s. 2, ch. 15772, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2383(2); s. 1, ch. 22001, 1943; s. 18, ch. 69-216; s. 10, ch. 2004-305.

F.S. 132.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 132.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 132.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 132.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 132.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 132.02

Total Results: 12

WESLEY WARD v. DANIEL JUNIOR, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-25

Snippet: support it.” § 907.041(4)(i); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.132(2). 3 See

ROSNIEL ORFELIA v. DANIEL JUNIOR, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-07

Snippet: support it.” § 907.041(4)(i); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.132(2). Id. at 477. We therefore grant the petition

Martin v. Justice Administration Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-12-17

Citation: 127 So. 3d 1281, 2013 WL 6635872, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19916

Snippet: felonies1 at $2,000. 2013 Fla. Laws Ch. 2012-118 at 132.2 If counsel seeks fees in excess of the statutory

LaSalle Bank National Ass'n v. Blackton, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-21

Citation: 59 So. 3d 329, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5670, 2011 WL 1496001

Snippet: this section. Blackton argues that section 713.132(2) required Independence to additionally attach a

Ginsberg v. Ryan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-14

Citation: 60 So. 3d 475, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5354, 2011 WL 1434695

Snippet: support it.” § 907.041(4)(i); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.132(2). The State and the trial court failed to follow

Diaz De La Portilla v. FLA. ELECTIONS COM'N

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-09-10

Citation: 857 So. 2d 913, 2003 WL 22082173

Snippet: disclaimers; five violations of subsection 106.132(2) for advertisements without indications of party

Thompson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-11-21

Citation: 570 So. 2d 423, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8899, 1990 WL 181567

Snippet: post-trial release during appeal. See Fla. Stat. § 903.132(2) and Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(e). Accordingly, we hereby

Hickey v. Baxter

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-12-28

Citation: 461 So. 2d 1364, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 50

Snippet: section 61.132, Florida Statutes (1983). Section 61.132[2] contains explicit requirements: (1) Every party

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-08-15

Snippet: State Dept. of Citrus v. Huff, 290 So.2d 130, 131-132 (2 D.C.A.), cert. denied, 295 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1974);

Jack Pickard Dodge, Inc. v. Yarbrough

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-11-21

Citation: 352 So. 2d 130

Snippet: this state which resulted in such injury; or *132 2. Products, materials, or things processed, serviced

Fernandez v. Cunningham

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-10-24

Citation: 268 So. 2d 166, 11 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 805

Snippet: Florence Citrus Growers' Ass'n, 104 Fla. 21, 139 So. 132. [2] Gerlach v. Donnelly, supra; Bolles v. O'Brien

Chandler Services, Inc. v. Florida City

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-08-22

Citation: 202 So. 2d 11, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4244

Snippet: inspection, regulation or other municipal service;*132 2. The General provision for licenses of this type