The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 132.13(a)(l)(i) (establishing a procedure-for refunding money paid at the over-quota rate) which . . .
. . . . § 132.13(a)(l)(i) (establishing a procedure for refunding money paid at the over-quota rate) which . . .
. . . The Wisconsin state plan provides for skilled nursing facilities, Wis.Admin.Code § HSS 132.13 (20), ( . . .
. . . the maintenance, development, improvement and use of harbors and seaports of the Commonwealth § 62.1-132.13 . . .
. . . Section 132.13(d) (2) (ii) permits other procedures for performing the Section 132.12 tests and inspections . . . as did the District Court, carefully reviewed the five printed pages containing Sections 132.12 and 132.13 . . . Sections 132.12 and 132.13(d) (2) (ii). ' However, while these sections prescribe air brake tests, they . . . Does not 49 CPR 132.13 in its title “Road Train and Intermediate Terminal Train Air Brake Tests” fully . . . No. 49 OPR 132.12 specifically refers to all trains. 49 CPR 132.13 mei-ely provides certain additional . . .
. . . This crew made the type of air brake test required by sec. 132.13(c) (1) “At a point other than initial . . . It claims that this movement was a transfer train movement, making sec. 132.13(e) (1) applicable, and . . . (e) (2), was not required, but the test prescribed by sec. 132.13(e) (1) was. . . . As previously noted, sec. 132.13(e) (1) prescribes a less rigorous test for “transfer train and yard . . . The statutory authority for secs. 132.12 and 132.13 is 45 U.S.C. sec. 9. . . .
. . . . § 132.13 is found in Rule 7 of the Car Service Rules of the Association of American Railroads. . . .
. . . Case No. 66-25 contains twenty causes of action; twelve charge violation of 49 CFR 132.13(e) (1) and . . . (Emphasis Supplied). 49 CFR 132.13 provides that transfer trains in yard train movements not exceeding . . . The TRRA crew made the brake test required by 49 CFR 132.13(c) (1).’ . . . The brake test required by 49 CFR 132.13(e) (1) was not made. . . . (c) (1) or whether it was required to make the test prescribed by 49 CFR 132.13(e) (1). . . .
. . . . § 132.13(e) (1) (1962 Supp.) required a visual inspection of the brakes on each car of the train to . . . Section 132.13(e) (1), Title 49 C.F.R. . . . Co., 269 U.S. 385, 46 S.Ct. 126, 70 L.Ed. 322, the railroad contends that if Section 132.13 (e) (1) is . . .
. . . inspected and the entire air brake system was tested, pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations § 132.13 . . . parties’ stipulation, that the inspection of the train’s brakes in San Bernardino complied with Section 132.13 . . .
. . . Title 45 United States Code Annotated (particularly Sections 6 and 9 thereof as amended), and Section 132.13 . . . these provisions were applicable, and that if the meaning and interpretation to be accorded Section 132.13 . . . Section 132.13(e) (1) of Code of Federal Regulations reads as follows: “Transfer train and yard train . . . So too, in 132.13(b), concerning freight trains, a reference to the caboose gauge is made. . . . Again in sub-division (2) of the same section, 132.13(c), it is said that, “Before proceeding it must . . .
. . . an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dated May 1, 1958, and more specifically on Section 132.13 . . . Section 132.13(e) (1) and (2) of said rules provides as follows: “(e)(1) Transfer train and yard train . . . be given and brakes released and each brake inspected to see that all have released. * * * ” Section 132.13 . . . visual inspection were required the Commission would have said so in the order and point to Section 132.13 . . . car is required by the rules and in support of its contention points to the final wording of Section 132.13 . . .
. . . applies to train movements not exceeding 20 miles and which rule was adopted by the Commission as § 132.13 . . . Section 132.13(e) (1) reads as follows: “Transfer train and yard train movements not exceeding 20 miles . . . The defendant contends that as the wording in § 132.12(b) (1) requires an “inspection”, and as § 132.13 . . . It is the further conclusion of this Court that the regulation in question (§ 132.13(e) (1)), an air . . . 1959, without determination by the crew that the brakes on each car were applied, was a violation of 132.13 . . .
. . . failure of proof to the contrary, we hold that 100 per cent of this gain, which we have found to be $132.13 . . .
. . . We think the allowance of this “installation expense” of $31,-132.13 was properly denied. . . .
. . . Berkebile assigned to the United States Gypsum Company, one of the intervening creditors, the sum of $132.13 . . .
