Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 132.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 132.23 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 132.23

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 132
GENERAL REFUNDING LAW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 132.23
132.23 Tax by municipalities; bonds to constitute general obligations; debt limit inapplicable.
(1) In case of refunding bonds issued by municipalities it shall be the duty of the governing board of the municipality charged by law with determining and fixing the amount of general property taxes for any fiscal year of the municipality, to ascertain the amount of:
(a) Principal and interest of refunding bonds due in such year for which moneys are not in hand.
(b) Principal and interest of refunding bonds due prior to such year and which are then or will be in default in such year, together with interest thereon.
(c) Sinking fund payments due in such year or due prior to such year and which are then or will be in default in such year.
(d) Such additional sum as may be necessary to make up for the estimated failure to collect taxes in such year.
(2) The said governing body of the municipality shall determine and fix the total of said sums as the amount to be raised by tax in addition to all other taxes for said fiscal year. The said amount shall thereupon be apportioned against, and levied and assessed on, all property subject to taxation in the manner provided by law, for taxes for other purposes in the municipalities and shall be collected and applied to such purpose by the official of the municipality charged by law with duty of apportioning, levying, assessing, collecting and applying taxes for other purposes.
(3) The refunding bonds issued in pursuance of this chapter by municipalities shall be general and unlimited obligations of the municipalities and the full faith and credit of the municipality is hereby irrevocably pledged for their payment. The municipality and each and every official and governing board thereof shall levy, assess, apportion and collect on and from all taxable real and personal property in the municipality such taxes as shall be sufficient to pay the interest and principal of the refunding bonds as they become due and payable.
(4) No other section of this chapter or of any other law, or of any agreement or resolution made by the municipality shall be construed to limit or restrict the powers or obligations of the municipality under this chapter and the provisions of any resolution of the municipality made pursuant to this chapter shall be construed as supplemental hereto for the greater protection of the refunding bonds, and shall not be construed as limiting or restricting the application of this section.
(5) All refunding bonds issued pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall not be subject to any limitation or indebtedness prescribed by any statutes, charter or other special act relating to the municipality.
History.s. 23, ch. 15772, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 2383(23).

F.S. 132.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 132.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 132.23


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 132.23
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 132.23.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE FIELDS,, 534 B.R. 126 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . The son’s contribution leaves $132.23 that is paid by the Debtors each month. d. . . .

A. BAUER v. UNITED STATES, 168 F. Supp. 539 (Ct. Cl. 1958)

. . . She claims, that her basis for the property was $5,-000 plus $132.23 of sales expense, and that her loss . . . If we add the $132.23 of sales expense we get a basis for the property in the hands of the plaintiff . . . As we have said, the plaintiff claims a basis of $5,000, plus the $132.23 sales expense. . . .

CHARLOTTE A. BAUER v. THE UNITED STATES, 144 Ct. Cl. 308 (Ct. Cl. 1958)

. . . She claims that her basis for the property was $5,000 plus $132.23 of sales expense, and that her loss . . . If we add the $132.23 of sales expense we get a basis for the property in the hands of the plaintiff . . . As we have said, the plaintiff claims a basis of $5,000, plus the $132.23 sales expense. . . . The latter sum was arrived at by adding $132.23 as the expense of sale to a basis of $5,000. . . .