Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 153.81 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 153.81 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 153.81

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 153
WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 153.81
153.81 Ad valorem maintenance tax.In addition to the ad valorem taxes authorized to be levied to pay the principal of and interest on general obligation bonds, or as additional security for revenue bonds or assessment bonds, any district is authorized to levy a special ad valorem maintenance tax of a sufficient number of mills upon the dollar of assessed valuation of property subject to taxation in the district to pay for the maintenance and operation and other corporate purposes of said district; provided, however, that such special maintenance tax shall in no event exceed 5 mills during any one year. Such special maintenance tax shall be levied and collected in the manner provided herein for ad valorem taxes levied and collected for debt service on bonds issued pursuant to this law.
History.s. 32, ch. 59-466.

F.S. 153.81 on Google Scholar

F.S. 153.81 on Casetext

Amendments to 153.81


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 153.81
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 153.81.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 153.81

Total Results: 7

Miami Purveyors, Inc. v. Forte

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-15

Citation: 407 So. 2d 330, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 22003

Snippet: DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge. These consolidated appeals are from a final judgment in favor of Miami Purveyors, Inc. (Purveyors) against Biscayne Bay Club, Inc., and an order dismissing with prejudice Purveyors’ action against Forte at the close of the plaintiff’s case in a non jury trial.1 We reverse the final judgment against Biscayne Bay Club, Inc., because, as is candidly admitted by Purveyors, there was no evidence introduced to support this judgment, which was entered by the trial court under

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-04-07

Snippet: other corporate purposes of the district. Section 153.81, F.S. Finally, subsections (2) and (3) of s. 159

Hurley v. Thomas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-12-11

Citation: 169 So. 2d 519

Snippet: 797; 49 Am.Jur., Specific Performance § 130, page 153; 81 C.J.S. Specific Performance § 70, page 577. There

Boca Ciega Sanitary District v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-02-17

Citation: 161 So. 2d 529

Snippet: directed primarily to F.S. Sections 153.60 4 and 153.81,5 F.S.A. The first section merely defining a district

State v. Town of Gulfport

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-06-06

Citation: 189 So. 703, 138 Fla. 505, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1437

Snippet: bonds for municipal purposes aggregating $1,034,153.81, on which is now past due a large amount of principal

In Re: Adoption of Carol Palmer

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-10-22

Citation: 176 So. 537, 129 Fla. 630, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1155

Snippet: in this connection Cathcart v Thompson, 77 Fla. 153, 81 So. 410. It appears that the adoption statute constitutes

Vanderpool Properties, Inc. v. Hess & Slager, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-10-18

Citation: 130 So. 457, 100 Fla. 933

Snippet: 793, 19 A. S. R. 23; McNeal v. Rider, 79 Minn. 153, 81 N.W. R. 830, 79 A. S. R. 437; Wright v. Bircher