Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 154.229 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 154.229 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 154.229

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XI
COUNTY ORGANIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Chapter 154
PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 154.229
154.229 Remedies.Any holder of bonds issued under the provisions of this part or of any of the coupons appertaining thereto, and the trustee under any trust agreement, except to the extent the rights herein given may be restricted by such trust agreement or the resolution authorizing the issuance of such bonds, may, either at law or in equity, by suit, action, mandamus, or other proceeding, protect and enforce any and all rights under the laws of this state or granted hereunder or under such trust agreement or resolution authorizing the issuance of such bonds, or under any agreement of lease or other contract executed by the authority pursuant to this part, and may enforce and compel the performance of all duties required by this part or by such trust agreement or resolution to be performed by any lessee or the authority or by any officer thereof, including the fixing, charging, and collecting of fees, rents, and charges.
History.s. 15, ch. 74-323.

F.S. 154.229 on Google Scholar

F.S. 154.229 on Casetext

Amendments to 154.229


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 154.229
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 154.229.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 154.229

Total Results: 1

Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Standard Oil Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-11-21

Citation: 135 So. 2d 26

Snippet: Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil Co., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 154, 229 F.2d 37, 42 (D.C. Cir., 1956), where the Court