Cases from cite.case.law:

L. KIRK, v. SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC. FAG LLC,, 887 F.3d 376 (8th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 159.61(b)(1)(i) (emphasis added). . . .

TRUTH FOUNDATION MINISTRIES, NFP, v. VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE,, 387 F. Supp. 3d 896 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . (See R.1-3, Zoning Code, Section 159.60, Land Use Chart; Section 159.61(C)(6) (E-R, Estate Residential . . . (See R.1-3, Zoning Code, Section 159.60, Land Use Chart; Section 159.61(C)(6) (E-R, Estate Residential . . . (See e.g., R.1-3), Zoning Code, Section 159.60, Land Use Chart; Section 159.61(C)(6) (E-R, Estate Residential . . . (See e.g., R.1-3), Zoning Code, Section 159.60, Land Use Chart; Section 159.61(C)(6) (E-R, Estate Residential . . .

PS CHEZ SIDNEY, L. L. C. v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 684 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 159.61(b)(1) (2012). . . .

FIVE RIVERS ELECTRONICS INNOVATION, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 755 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . . § 159.61(b)(2)(f) (emphasis added). . . . manufacturing the product “during the fiscal year that is the subject of the disbursement,” 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . .

v., 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 1077 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . . § 159.61 (2009). . . .

SIOUX HONEY ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 722 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . . § 159.61 (2009). . . .

B. B. v. U. S. W. U. S., 33 Ct. Int'l Trade 560 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . . § 159.61(b). . . . Plaintiffs next complain that in calculating CDSOA distributions Customs ignores 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(c . . . Under 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(c), the expenses incurred for the other products, as opposed to the shrimp, . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 159.61-64. . . . See 19 C.F.R. §§ 159.61-64; 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(c), (e)(3). . . .

SOUTHERN SHRIMP ALLIANCE, B. B v. UNITED STATES, U. S. W. U. S., 617 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2009)

. . . . § 159.61(b). . . . Plaintiffs next complain that in calculating CDSOA distributions Customs ignores 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(c . . . Under 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(c), the expenses incurred for the other products, as opposed to the shrimp, . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 159.61-64. . . . See 19 C.F.R. §§ 159.61-64; 19 U.S.C. § 1675c(c), (e)(3). . . .

SKF USA, INC. v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, U. S. C. R., 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 159.61(b)(l)(i); Cathedral Candle v. U.S. . . .

Co. v., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 1281 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . . § 159.61(a) (“Byrd Distributions”), are allocated based on “qualifying expenditures,” i.e., certain . . . production,” paid by affected domestic producers. 19 U.S.C. §§ 1675c(b)(4); 1675c(d)(2)-(3); 19C.F.R. § 159.61 . . .

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. UNITED STATES,, 507 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2007)

. . . . § 159.61(a) (“Byrd Distributions”), are allocated based on “qualifying expenditures,” i.e., certain . . . production,” paid by affected domestic producers. 19 U.S.C. §§ 1675c(b)(4); 1675c(d)(2)-(3); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . .

n n v. J. U. S. U. S. Co. Co. Ak n, 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 391 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . . § 159.61(a) (“Byrd Distributions”), are intended to strengthen trade law remedies, through an allocation . . . production,” paid by affected domestic producers, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1675c(b)(4); 1675c(d)(2)-(3); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . .

CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE ALLIANCE n n v. UNITED STATES J. U. S. LLC U. S. Co. Co. AK n, 425 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . . § 159.61(a) (“Byrd Distributions”), are intended to strengthen trade law remedies, through an allocation . . . production,” paid by affected domestic producers, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1675c(b)(4); 1675c(d)(2)-(3); 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . .

DIXON TICONDEROGA COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION C., 366 F. Supp. 2d 1352 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . notice will include the list of domestic producers, based upon the list supplied by the USITC (see § 159.61 . . .

v. C., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 406 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . notice will include the list of domestic producers, based upon the list supplied by the USITC (see § 159.61 . . .

CANDLE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION C. Co. Co., 374 F.3d 1087 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 159.61(b)(1)® (2003). . . . detail the duly authorized succession by which it is entitled to file the certification. 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . . detail the duly authorized succession by which it is entitled to file the certification. 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . .

v. C. Of Co. Co., 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 560 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . . § 159.61(b). . . . companies” that file applications for certification are eligible to receive distributions. 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . . receive CDSOA distributions as the “successor company” to Lenox and Colonial, “as provided in Section 159.61 . . . Title 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(b)(l)(i) permits a “successor company” to “file a certification to claim an . . . Title 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(b)(l)(i), titled “Successor Company,” states as follows: In the case of a company . . .

CANDLE CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND BLYTH, INC. v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, C. Co. Co., 259 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . . § 159.61(b). . . . companies” that file applications for certification are eligible to receive distributions. 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . . receive CDSOA distributions as the “successor company” to Lenox and Colonial, “as provided in Section 159.61 . . . Title 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(b)(l)(i) permits a “successor company” to “file a certification to claim an . . . the provisions of the statute prevented the company from qualifying as a successor under 19 C.F.R. § 159.61 . . .

HUAIYIN FOREIGN TRADE CORP. Co. USA, GMRI, v. UNITED STATES,, 322 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 159.61(a) (2002). . . .

DMV USA, Co. Co. AFL- CIO CLC, v. U. S. NKK Co., 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 735 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2002)

. . . . § 159.61. . . . See 19 C.F.R.§ 159.61(a). . . . Id. at § 159.61(c). . . . incurred after the issuance, and prior to the termination, of the antidumping duty order * * *.” 19 C.F.R. 159.61 . . .

ALTX, INC. USA, Co. AFL- CIO CLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 211 F. Supp. 2d 1378 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2002)

. . . . § 159.61. . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 159.61(a). . . . Id. at § 159.61(c). . . . incurred after the issuance, and prior to the termination, of the antidumping duty order.... ” 19 C.F.R. 159.61 . . .

In KORS, INC. RUTLAND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. KORS, INC., 13 B.R. 683 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1981)

. . . and the amounts due beginning November 24, 1980 are as follows: November 24,1980 to December 1,1980 $ 159.61 . . .