The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES

Chapter 170
SUPPLEMENTAL AND ALTERNATIVE METHOD OF MAKING LOCAL MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 170.10

170.10 Legal proceedings instituted upon failure of property owner to pay special assessment or interest when due; foreclosure; service of process.—Each annual installment provided for in s. 170.09 shall be paid upon the dates specified in said resolution, with interest upon all deferred payments, until the entire amount of said assessment has been paid, and upon the failure of any property owner to pay any annual installment due, or any part thereof, or any annual interest upon deferred payments, the governing authority of the municipality shall cause to be brought the necessary legal proceedings by a bill in chancery to enforce payment thereof with all accrued interest and penalties, together with all legal costs incurred, including a reasonable solicitor’s fee, to be assessed as part of the costs and in the event of default in the payment of any installment of an assessment, or any accrued interest on said assessment, the whole assessment, with the interest and penalties thereon, shall immediately become due and payable and subject to foreclosure. In the foreclosure of any special assessment service of process against unknown or nonresident defendants may be had by publication, as now provided by law in other chancery suits. The foreclosure proceedings shall be prosecuted to a sale and conveyance of the property involved in said proceedings as now provided by law in suits to foreclose mortgages; or, in the alternative, said proceeding may be instituted and prosecuted under chapter 173.

History.—s. 10, ch. 9298, 1923; CGL 3031; s. 7, ch. 59-396.

F.S. 170.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 170.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 170.10

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 170.10

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 170.10.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

NNEBE, v. DAUS, v., 931 F.3d 66 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 170.10 (misdemeanors) with N.Y. Crim. Proc. § 180.10 (felonies). . . .

G. MCDONOUGH, v. SMITH, J. Jr. F. A. F. O B. J., 898 F.3d 259 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . Penal Law §§ 170.10, 170.25. The case against McDonough proceeded to trial but ended in a mistrial. . . .

IN RE NINA, In In L. In B. In E. In R. In D. In In E. In D. In Q. In D. In In G. In W. In In T. In U. In In C. In In B. In J. In In C. In D. In In In K. v. MVP LLC A. MYP LLC M., 562 B.R. 585 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . (New York Penal Law §§ 170.00, 170.10). . . .

FLORES, v. H. HOLDER, Jr., 603 F. App'x 30 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . deceive or injure another, he utters or possesses any forged instrument of a kind specified in section 170.10 . . .

PITTMAN, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF HEMPSTEAD, 49 F. Supp. 3d 307 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Although she is not a named Defendant, the Plaintiff accuses Officer Washington, in violation of NYSPL § 170.10 . . .

BRIGHTHAUPT, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 36 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . accordance with the calculations in Court’s Exhibit 3, plaintiffs are due $24,196.88 in attorney’s fees and $170.10 . . .

R. AMEDURI, III, v. VILLAGE OF FRANKFORT, As a, 10 F. Supp. 3d 320 (N.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Penal Law § 170.10(3) and Official Misconduct in violation of N.Y. Penal Law § 195.00(1). . . . Penal Law § 170.10(3). . . .

B. VAN DUZER B. v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 995 F. Supp. 2d 673 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Penal Law § 170.10 (McKinney); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.21 (West). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BARNER,, 635 F. Supp. 2d 138 (N.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Penal Law § 170.10(2). . . .

APANPA, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES, 276 F. App'x 227 (3d Cir. 2008)

. . . deceive or injure another, he utters or possesses any forged instrument of a kind specified in section 170.10 . . . Section 170.10 includes commercial instruments, credit cards, deeds, wills, public records, written instruments . . .

REPUBLIC OF BENIN, v. MEZEI,, 483 F. Supp. 2d 312 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . New York Penal Law § 170.10 provides in relevant part that [a] person is guilty of forgery in the second . . . whether a false or misrepresented agency endorsement constitutes a forgery under New York Penal Law § 170.10 . . .

REMINGTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, v. EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF OSCEOLA, ETC., 941 So. 2d 15 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 170.10, Florida Statutes (2005), provides that, upon default in the payment of an assessment . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAILEY,, 187 F. App'x 846 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . also held him responsible for methamphetamine he sold to Doreena Travis (six grams) and Darrell Sneed (170.10 . . .

B. CAESAR, v. R. GONZALES,, 184 F. App'x 55 (2d Cir. 2006)

. . . 1996, Caesar pled guilty to forgery in the second degree in violation of New York Penal Law (“NYPL”) § 170.10 . . . Upon our review of the elements of NYPL § 170.10(1), we conclude that Caesar’s conviction under § 170.10 . . . constitutes an “aggravated felony” within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(R) because the elements of § 170.10 . . . as to whether Caesar’s two prior convictions for forgery in the second degree, New York Penal Law § 170.10 . . . Whether a conviction under NYPL § 170.10(1) constitutes an aggravated felony is a determination we review . . .

UNITED STATES v. ENGLER,, 422 F.3d 692 (8th Cir. 2005)

. . . The court based Engler’s sentence on 0.93 grams of actual methamphetamine, 170.10 grams of methamphetamine . . .

CRISPINO, v. J. ALLARD,, 378 F. Supp. 2d 393 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Penal Law § 170.10(1)) and three counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree . . . or injure another, he utter[ed] or possessed] ahy forged instrument of a kind specified in Section 170.10 . . . Penal Law § 170.10(1). . . . See Penal Law § 170.10(1). . . .

E. SHAIN, v. ELLISON, a a H. MADDEN, a, 356 F.3d 211 (2d Cir. 2004)

. . . Law § 170.10(7) (Consol.2003). . . .

DODGE, A. v. COUNTY OF ORANGE H. H. v. H., 282 F. Supp. 2d 41 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . . § 170.10(7), as recognized in Shain. 273 F.3d at 65. . . . .

KENDALL, v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION SERVICE, U. S., 261 F. Supp. 2d 296 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . . § 170.10(1); and offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree in violation of N.Y. . . .

KRIMSTOCK, v. W. KELLY,, 306 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . . §§ 170.10 et seq.; People v. . . .

ALABAMA v. SHELTON, 535 U.S. 654 (U.S. 2002)

. . . Law § 170.10(3)(c) (West 1993); Okla. Stat., Tit. 22, § 1355.6.A (West Supp. 2002); Ore. Rev. Stat. . . .

E. SHAIN, v. ELLISON, No. a a H. a, 273 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 170.10(7). . . .

KINZER, v. HARRIS,, 146 F. Supp. 2d 194 (N.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . deceive or injure another, he utters or possesses any forged instrument of a kind specified in section 170.10 . . .

SULKOWSKA, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, A B C, 129 F. Supp. 2d 274 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . See New York Penal Law (“NYPL”) §§ 170.10(3), 170.25, 170.45(2). . . . See NYPL §§ 170.10(3), 170.25,170.45(2) At trial, Daskalakis testified that he inferred plaintiffs intent . . . Section 170.10(3) states: "A person is guilty of forgery in the second degree when, with intent to defi'aud . . . NYPL § 170.10(3) (McKinney's 1999) (emphasis added). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LASKY,, 23 F. Supp. 2d 236 (E.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . arrested on November 25, 1997 in Suffolk County for forgery in the second degree, in violation of § 170.10 . . .

R. IPPOLITO, v. J. MEISEL, A. J. W. S., 958 F. Supp. 155 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . See Id. at §§ 10.10, 170.10(1). . . .

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. CENTRA, INC., 59 F.3d 30 (6th Cir. 1995)

. . . $54,194.70 $163.10 $143,555.30 Yeaman, Roger $136,225.80 $69,326.40 -0-$205,552.20 Anaia, David $207.20 $170.10 . . .

N. ANTONIOUS F. v. MUHAMMAD, J. Jr., 873 F. Supp. 817 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . forgery, criminal impersonation and criminal possession of a forged instrument in violation of sections 170.10 . . .

W. BROOKS, v. W. WEINBERGER,, 730 F. Supp. 1132 (D.D.C. 1989)

. . . As a result, Gabriel earned a total of $170.10 in differential or premium pay. . . . Similarly, 74.5/160s of the $170.10 is held to have been earned during the overtime hours. . . . {[(a + b)(z) + y]/(a + b)} = reg rate/hour = [(160) ($9) + 170.10] divided by 160 = $10.06 2a. . . . rate. = $9.00 + [170.10/160 = $1.06] = $10.06 And total pay entitlement is: 1. . . . The $9.20 in the rule is the equivalent in concept to Gabriel’s $170.10. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. WARD, J. I., 845 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . Under N.Y.Crim.Proc.Law § 170.10(3) (McKinney 1982), an arrestee has a right to the assistance of counsel . . .

In CHANDLER, CHANDLER, v. LINCOLN CAPITAL CORPORATION ASEN,, 76 B.R. 927 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . Section 170.10 of the New York State Penal Law defines forgery in the second degree as follows: A person . . .

WILLIAMS, v. WARD,, 671 F. Supp. 225 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . have the right to the aid of counsel at an arraignment pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law § 170.10 . . .

In W. WOOD, STRUNK v. WOOD,, 75 B.R. 308 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . The Court took judicial notice of the provisions of New York Penal Law § 170.10 (McKinney 1975, Supp. . . . Penal Law § 170.10 provides in relevant part: A person is guilty of forgery in the second degree when . . .

ISARAPHANICH, v. UNITED STATES, 632 F. Supp. 1531 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . . §§ 70.00(3)(b), 70.06(4)(b), & 170.10 (McKinney 1975 & Supp. 1986). . . .

In PINEVIEW ESTATES, INC. CREWS LAKE ROAD AND BRIDGE DISTRICT, v. PINEVIEW ESTATES, INC., 57 B.R. 483 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1986)

. . . On September 14, 1984 the District instituted an action pursuant to § 170.10 Fla. . . .

L. BEATTY, v. C. SNOW,, 588 F. Supp. 809 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . . § 170.10 (McKinney’s 1975). . . . .

CITY OF VENICE, a v. VALENTE,, 429 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 170.10, Fla. Stat. (1981). . . .

TEXAS v. OKLAHOMA, 457 U.S. 172 (U.S. 1982)

. . . distance of 1675.30 feet; North 76°21' West a distance of 413.7 feet; North 86°01' West a distance of 170.10 . . .

BRINKMAN, v. J. GILLIGAN,, 557 F. Supp. 610 (S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . 161.2 35.9 135.90 $70.00 1976 170.5 45.2 145.20 $75.00 1977 181.5 56.2 156.20 $80.00 1978 195.4 70.1 170.10 . . .

SOLOMON, v. J. SMITH,, 645 F.2d 1179 (2d Cir. 1981)

. . . Crim.Proc.Law §§ 1.20(1), (8), (17); 100.05; 170.10(1); 180.10(1) (McKinney 1971, 1980 Supp.); People . . .

J. HEALY, v. J. MALCOLM,, 496 F. Supp. 941 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . Penal Law § 170.10 (McKinney 1967) (emphasis added). . . .

RUMMEL v. ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, 445 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1980)

. . . Penal Law §§ 70.00 (2)(d), 170.10, 170.25 (McKinney 1967 and 1975) (up to 7 years); N. C. Gen. . . .

In LOCATELLI, a k a a k a, 468 F. Supp. 568 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . Penal Law §§ 155.05, 170.10, and 110.00 (McKinney 1975). . . . New York Penal Law § 170.10 provides, inter alia, as follows: A person is guilty of forgery in the second . . .

SCOTT v. ILLINOIS, 440 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1979)

. . . Law § 170.10 (3) (McKinney 1971) (all misdemeanors except traffic violations) ; People v. . . .

NATCO THEATRES, INC. v. RATNER, G., 463 F. Supp. 1124 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . Penal Law §§ 170.10, 170.15 (McKinney, 1975). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. G. ANDERSON,, 584 F.2d 369 (10th Cir. 1978)

. . . business and personal records, resulting in a deficiency assessed in the amount of $2,842.93, plus $170.10 . . .

GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION v. KIERNAN, 47 Fla. Supp. 92 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1978)

. . . prevailing party to recover attorney’s fee in landlord/tenant disputes over security deposits; Sec. 170.10 . . .

T. O. v., 32 T.C. 824 (T.C. 1959)

. . . In 1955 petitioners claimed machinery and equipment depreciation in the amount of $170.10. . . .

A. PHELAN, v. MIDDLE STATES OIL CORPORATION KRAUSHAAR D. W. D. v. GLASS P. Jr. P., 220 F.2d 593 (2d Cir. 1955)

. . . . § 170.10. . 196 F.2d 668, 675. . Crites, Inc., v. . . .

WAYNE UNITED GAS CO. v. OWENS- ILLINOIS GLASS CO., 91 F.2d 827 (4th Cir. 1937)

. . . The assets of debtor consisted of cash in the hands of its receivers amounting to $532,-170.10, which . . .

LAMPORT MANUFACTURING SUPPLY CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 65 Ct. Cl. 579 (Ct. Cl. 1928)

. . . above was sold as of July 19-23,1921, in the following-quantities and amounts: 1,000 yards at .1701_ $170.10 . . .