Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 171.43 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 171.043 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 171.043 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 171.043

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 171
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 171.043
171.043 Character of the area to be annexed.A municipal governing body may propose to annex an area only if it meets the general standards of subsection (1) and the requirements of either subsection (2) or subsection (3).
(1) The total area to be annexed must be contiguous to the municipality’s boundaries at the time the annexation proceeding is begun and reasonably compact, and no part of the area shall be included within the boundary of another incorporated municipality.
(2) Part or all of the area to be annexed must be developed for urban purposes. An area developed for urban purposes is defined as any area which meets any one of the following standards:
(a) It has a total resident population equal to at least two persons for each acre of land included within its boundaries;
(b) It has a total resident population equal to at least one person for each acre of land included within its boundaries and is subdivided into lots and tracts so that at least 60 percent of the total number of lots and tracts are 1 acre or less in size; or
(c) It is so developed that at least 60 percent of the total number of lots and tracts in the area at the time of annexation are used for urban purposes, and it is subdivided into lots and tracts so that at least 60 percent of the total acreage, not counting the acreage used at the time of annexation for nonresidential urban purposes, consists of lots and tracts 5 acres or less in size.
(3) In addition to the area developed for urban purposes, a municipal governing body may include in the area to be annexed any area which does not meet the requirements of subsection (2) if such area either:
(a) Lies between the municipal boundary and an area developed for urban purposes, so that the area developed for urban purposes is either not adjacent to the municipal boundary or cannot be served by the municipality without extending services or water or sewer lines through such sparsely developed area; or
(b) Is adjacent, on at least 60 percent of its external boundary, to any combination of the municipal boundary and the boundary of an area or areas developed for urban purposes as defined in subsection (2).

The purpose of this subsection is to permit municipal governing bodies to extend corporate limits to include all nearby areas developed for urban purposes and, where necessary, to include areas which at the time of annexation are not yet developed for urban purposes whose future probable use is urban and which constitute necessary land connections between the municipality and areas developed for urban purposes or between two or more areas developed for urban purposes.

History.s. 1, ch. 74-190; s. 2, ch. 76-176.

F.S. 171.043 on Google Scholar

F.S. 171.043 on CourtListener

Amendments to 171.043


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 171.043

Total Results: 8

Capella v. City of Gainesville

377 So. 2d 658, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4857

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1979 | Docket: 1521653

Cited 28 times | Published

annexed must meet all the standards specified in section 171.043, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1976). Chapter 77-557

BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS v. City of Cocoa

953 So. 2d 8, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 2007 WL 28294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2007 | Docket: 1712749

Published

disagree with Judge Evander's analysis of section 171.043, Florida Statutes (2003). Rather, we find that

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 30, 2004 | Docket: 3255225

Published

meet the criteria for annexation set forth in section 171.043, Florida Statutes, may be proposed for exclusion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 10, 1998 | Docket: 3258122

Published

since that property meets the requirements of section 171.043, Florida Statutes, and such an action would

Town of Baldwin v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville

610 So. 2d 95, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12783, 1992 WL 371321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1992 | Docket: 64692754

Published

lands within the boundaries of Duval County. Section 171.043, Florida Statutes, prohibits annexation of

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 26, 1991 | Docket: 3258056

Published

exclusion by municipal governing bodies.6 Section 171.043, F.S., prescribes the character of property

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 12, 1978 | Docket: 3256034

Published

owner or owners pursuant to s. 171.044, F. S. Section 171.043, F. S., begins: A municipal governing

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 7, 1975 | Docket: 3256715

Published

in s.171.043 . . . . (Emphasis supplied.) Section 171.043 provides in part that A municipal governing