Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 171.043 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 171.043 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 171.043 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 171.043

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 171
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
171.043 Character of the area to be annexed.A municipal governing body may propose to annex an area only if it meets the general standards of subsection (1) and the requirements of either subsection (2) or subsection (3).
(1) The total area to be annexed must be contiguous to the municipality’s boundaries at the time the annexation proceeding is begun and reasonably compact, and no part of the area shall be included within the boundary of another incorporated municipality.
(2) Part or all of the area to be annexed must be developed for urban purposes. An area developed for urban purposes is defined as any area which meets any one of the following standards:
(a) It has a total resident population equal to at least two persons for each acre of land included within its boundaries;
(b) It has a total resident population equal to at least one person for each acre of land included within its boundaries and is subdivided into lots and tracts so that at least 60 percent of the total number of lots and tracts are 1 acre or less in size; or
(c) It is so developed that at least 60 percent of the total number of lots and tracts in the area at the time of annexation are used for urban purposes, and it is subdivided into lots and tracts so that at least 60 percent of the total acreage, not counting the acreage used at the time of annexation for nonresidential urban purposes, consists of lots and tracts 5 acres or less in size.
(3) In addition to the area developed for urban purposes, a municipal governing body may include in the area to be annexed any area which does not meet the requirements of subsection (2) if such area either:
(a) Lies between the municipal boundary and an area developed for urban purposes, so that the area developed for urban purposes is either not adjacent to the municipal boundary or cannot be served by the municipality without extending services or water or sewer lines through such sparsely developed area; or
(b) Is adjacent, on at least 60 percent of its external boundary, to any combination of the municipal boundary and the boundary of an area or areas developed for urban purposes as defined in subsection (2).

The purpose of this subsection is to permit municipal governing bodies to extend corporate limits to include all nearby areas developed for urban purposes and, where necessary, to include areas which at the time of annexation are not yet developed for urban purposes whose future probable use is urban and which constitute necessary land connections between the municipality and areas developed for urban purposes or between two or more areas developed for urban purposes.

History.s. 1, ch. 74-190; s. 2, ch. 76-176.

F.S. 171.043 on Google Scholar

F.S. 171.043 on CourtListener

Amendments to 171.043


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 171.043

Total Results: 8  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Capella v. City of Gainesville, 377 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1979).

Cited 28 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4857

...Those qualified to participate in the referendum are the electors residing in the area to be annexed, together with the electors residing within the corporate limits of the City. The lands sought to be annexed must meet all the standards specified in section 171.043, Florida Statutes (Supp....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1978).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

owner or owners pursuant to s. 171.044, F. S. Section 171.043, F. S., begins: A municipal governing
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1975).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

in s.171.043 . . . . (Emphasis supplied.) Section 171.043 provides in part that A municipal governing
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1991).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

...general law standards and procedures for adjusting the boundaries of Florida municipalities and acts as a preemption to the state of such legislation. 5 Pursuant to the act, only those areas which do not meet the criteria for annexation set forth in s. 171.043 , F.S., may be proposed for exclusion by municipal governing bodies. 6 Section 171.043 , F.S., prescribes the character of property to be annexed and requires such things as contiguity to the municipality's boundaries, compactness, and that part or all of the area be developed for urban purposes. 7 Thus, property which fits the requirements of s. 171.043 , F.S., may not be excluded from a municipality. 8 The determination of whether the property to be excluded from the City of Ormond Beach is outside the scope of s. 171.043 , F.S., may not be made by this office....
...The notice must describe the area to be excluded and must appear in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least once per week for two consecutive weeks. The description included in the notice must include a statement of findings to show that the area to be excluded fails to meet the criteria of s. 171.043 , F.S....
...of municipalities in this state. (2) The provisions of any special act or municipal charter relating to the adjusting of municipal boundaries in effect on October 1, 1974, are repealed except as otherwise provided herein. 6 Section 171.052 , F.S. 7 Section 171.043 (1) and (2), F.S. 8 See , AGO 76-221 (The contraction procedures provided by s. 171.051 , F.S., may be used to exclude only areas found not to meet the characteristics required by s. 171.043 , F.S....
...[1976 Supp.], of areas to be annexed. A municipality is without authority to enact a contraction ordinance, either on the initiative of its governing body or in response to a petition therefor, regarding an area which complies with the annexation characteristics set forth in s. 171.043 .) 9 For purposes of the act, "[c]ontraction" is defined as "the reversion of real property within municipal boundaries to an unincorporated status." See , s....
Copy

Bd. of Cnty. Com'rs v. City of Cocoa, 953 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 2007 WL 28294

...of Volusia v. City of Deltona, 925 So.2d 340, 343 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Finding no miscarriage of justice under the facts presented, we deny certiorari review. In so ruling, we note that we do not necessarily disagree with Judge Evander's analysis of section 171.043, Florida Statutes (2003)....
...A clearly established principle of law may be derived from a statute. Thus, an improper interpretation of a statute may provide the basis for granting certiorari review. Kaklamanos, 843 So.2d at 890. In the present case, the facts are not disputed. The issue is whether section 171.043, Florida Statutes (2003), permits a municipality to involuntarily annex undeveloped property where no developed property is included in the annexation. The circuit court answered this question in the affirmative, notwithstanding the statute's contrary language. Section 171.043 provides that a municipality may involuntarily annex property *10 only if it meets the general standards of subsection (1) and the requirements of either subsection (2) or (3)....
Copy

Town of Baldwin v. Consol. City of Jacksonville, 610 So. 2d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12783, 1992 WL 371321

...the Town of Baldwin.” All lands are incorporated as either the municipal corporation of Jacksonville or several ‘quasi municipal’ corporations, such as Baldwin. Therefore, there are no unincorporated lands within the boundaries of Duval County. Section 171.043, Florida Statutes, prohibits annexation of an area “included within the boundary of another incorporated municipality.” Further, pursuant to section 2.06 of Jacksonville’s Charter, only the legislature can expand the territory o...
...s any other municipal corporation in Florida pursuant to Albury , and (2) the right of any incorporated municipality (such as the City of Jacksonville) to be protected from annexation of land within its boundaries by another municipality pursuant to section 171.043(1)....
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 1998).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

since that property meets the requirements of section 171.043, Florida Statutes, and such an action would
Copy

Ago (Fla. Att'y Gen. 2004).

Published | Florida Attorney General Reports

...es general law standards and procedures for adjusting the boundaries of Florida municipalities and acts as a preemption to the state of such legislation. Pursuant to the act, only those areas that do not meet the criteria for annexation set forth in section 171.043 , Florida Statutes, may be proposed for exclusion by municipal governing bodies....
...The notice must describe the area to be excluded and must appear in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least once per week for two consecutive weeks. The description included in the notice must include a statement of findings to show that the area to be excluded fails to meet the criteria of section 171.043 , Florida Statutes....
...171.022 (1), Fla. Stat., stating that "[i]t is further the purpose of this act to provide viable and usable general law standards and procedures for adjusting the boundaries of municipalities in this state." 8 Section 171.052 (1), Fla. Stat. And see s. 171.043 , Fla....
...Stat., prescribing the character of property to be annexed and requiring such things as contiguity to the municipality's boundaries, compactness, and that part or all of the area be developed for urban purposes. Thus, property which fits the requirements of s. 171.043 may not be excluded from a municipality....