...The prime contention to support reversal is that Chapter 180, Florida Statutes, F.S. A., a general act, authorizes the pledging of “the revenues of all or any part of” existing plants or new plants to secure the payment of money borrowed for construction. It is then contended that under Section
180.08, Florida Statutes, F. S.A., the municipality is precluded from imposing any tax liability upon real or *666 personal property in the municipality. Appellant asserts that the Section
180.08 further provides that the revenue certificates shall not constitute a debt against the city “but shall be a lien only against or upon the property and revenues of such utility * * For reversal the appellant relies upon Easterlin v. City of New Port Richey, Fla.1958,
105 So.2d 361 . Both the cigarette tax and the utilities services tax are excise taxes levied and collected pursuant to general law. They are not ad valorem taxes or property taxes within the contemplation of Section
180.08, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. City of Orlando v. National Gas and Appliance Co. Inc., Fla.1952,
57 So.2d 853 ; State v. City of Coral Gables, Fla.1954,
72 So.2d 48 . In grounding its position upon the provisions of Section
180.08, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., we think the appellant overlooks the provisions of Section
180.21, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which reads'as follows: “The authority and powers granted by this chapter to municipalities shall be in addition...