Cases from cite.case.law:

O BRIEN, v. T. McMAHON, a L. Jr. A. E. a a T. T. a, 44 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Lesnick, Appleman on Insurance § 180.08 (2d ed. 2006) (“[I]n most life insurance policies the right to . . .

FUJI PHOTO FILM U. S. A. INC. v. F. McNULTY, S. a k a C. K. ADK LLC, LLC,, 640 F. Supp. 2d 300 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . ADK, and Windwood defendants bribed McNulty in violation of New York Penal Law sections 180.03 and 180.08 . . . Section 180.08 prohibits the receiving of bribes under the same circumstances detailed in Section 180.03 . . .

MADDALONI JEWELERS, INC. v. ROLEX WATCH U. S. A. INC., 354 F. Supp. 2d 293 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . The first is commercial bribe receiving in the first degree, a felony defined by New York Penal Law § 180.08 . . . . (3d AC ¶ 49) Under section 180.08, “[a] person is guilty of first-degree commercial bribe receiving . . . therefore conclude that plaintiff has raised no triable issues of fact as to any violation of section 180.08 . . . Penal L. § 180.08 states: "An employee, agent or fiduciary is guilty of commercial bribe receiving in . . . Penal Law § 180.08, plaintiff nevertheless would have failed to establish two distinct predicate acts . . .

In THE EXTRADITION OF CHAN SEONG- I, A K A I, A K A A K A S. A K A A K A S. A K A a s, 346 F. Supp. 2d 1149 (D.N.M. 2004)

. . . Penal Law § 180.08 (felony when value of benefit exceeds one thousand dollars and causes economic harm . . .

SUPER NATURAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. MUSCLETECH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT,, 140 F. Supp. 2d 970 (E.D. Wis. 2001)

. . . Penal Law §§ 180.03 and 180.08). . . .

PHILIP MORRIS, INCORPORATED, v. GRINNELL LITHOGRAPHIC CO. INC., 67 F. Supp. 2d 126 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . 4913, 1996 WL 556963, at *4 (S.D.N.Y., Oct. 1, 1996) (no private right of action under Penal Law § 180.08 . . . explaining that under New York law an employer may recover from his employee bribes taken in violation of § 180.08 . . .

In HOMSCHEK, SEARS, ROEBUCK CO. v. HOMSCHEK,, 216 B.R. 748 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . Saw $211.98 07/31/95 TV/Stereo/Home Electronics $296.79 08/02/95 Tools/Hardware $679.34 08/03/95 VCR $180.08 . . .

E. CLAPP, v. J. GREENE,, 743 F. Supp. 273 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . these acts were commercial bribery and bribe receiving in violation of New York Penal Law §§ 180.03 and 180.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. COVINO,, 837 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1988)

. . . Penal Law § 180.08 (McKinney Supp.1988), and “Commercial bribe receiving in the second degree,” N.Y. . . .

TEXWOOD LIMITED, v. GERBER,, 621 F. Supp. 585 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . , Drake, and JoSo gave, and defendant Wat accepted, commercial bribes in violation of §§ 180.03 and 180.08 . . . Penal Law §§ 180.03, 180.08 (McKinney Supp.1984-1985). . . . Gerber, Drake, and JoSo gave, and defendant Wat accepted commercial bribes in violation of §§ 180.03 and 180.08 . . . However, it appears that an employer may recover from its employee bribes taken in violation of § 180.08 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SEREGOS,, 655 F.2d 33 (2d Cir. 1981)

. . . .” “§ 180.08 Commercial bribe receiving in the first degree An employee, agent or fiduciary is guilty . . .

STATE v. CITY OF WEST PANAMA CITY BEACH,, 127 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 1961)

. . . It is then contended that under Section 180.08, Florida Statutes, F. . . . Appellant asserts that the Section 180.08 further provides that the revenue certificates shall not constitute . . . They are not ad valorem taxes or property taxes within the contemplation of Section 180.08, Florida Statutes . . . In grounding its position upon the provisions of Section 180.08, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., we think the . . .

THE STATE OF FLORIDA v. CITY OF FORT MYERS, 156 Fla. 681 (Fla. 1945)

. . . question may be answered by turning to Chapter 180 Florida Statutes, 1941, F.S.A., where, in Section 180.08 . . .

In LYMAN, 55 F. 29 (S.D.N.Y. 1893)

. . . March 3, 1875, where under the same head, (18 St. at Large, p. 395,) appears the appropriation of $388,-180.08 . . .