Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 185.35 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 185.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 185.35 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 185.35

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XII
MUNICIPALITIES
Chapter 185
MUNICIPAL POLICE PENSIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 185.35
185.35 Municipalities that have their own retirement plans for police officers.In order for a municipality that has its own retirement plan for police officers, or for police officers and firefighters if both are included, to participate in the distribution of the tax fund established under s. 185.08, a local law plan must meet minimum benefits and minimum standards, except as provided in the mutual consent provisions in paragraph (1)(g) with respect to the minimum benefits not met as of October 1, 2012.
(1) If a municipality has a retirement plan for police officers, or for police officers and firefighters if both are included, which, in the opinion of the division, meets minimum benefits and minimum standards, the board of trustees of the retirement plan must place the income from the premium tax in s. 185.08 in such plan for the sole and exclusive use of its police officers, or its police officers and firefighters if both are included, where it shall become an integral part of that plan and be used to fund benefits as provided herein. Effective October 1, 2015, for noncollectively bargained service or upon entering into a collective bargaining agreement on or after July 1, 2015:
(a) The base premium tax revenues must be used to fund minimum benefits or other retirement benefits in excess of the minimum benefits as determined by the municipality.
(b) Of the additional premium tax revenues received that are in excess of the amount received for the 2012 calendar year, 50 percent must be used to fund minimum benefits or other retirement benefits in excess of the minimum benefits as determined by the municipality, and 50 percent must be placed in a defined contribution plan component to fund special benefits.
(c) Additional premium tax revenues not described in paragraph (b) must be used to fund benefits that are not included in the minimum benefits. If the additional premium tax revenues subject to this paragraph exceed the full annual cost of benefits provided through the plan which are in excess of the minimum benefits, any amount in excess of the full annual cost must be used as provided in paragraph (b).
(d) Of any accumulations of additional premium tax revenues which have not been allocated to fund benefits in excess of the minimum benefits, 50 percent of the amount of the accumulations must be used to fund special benefits and 50 percent must be applied to fund any unfunded actuarial liabilities of the plan; provided that any amount of accumulations in excess of the amount required to fund the unfunded actuarial liabilities must be used to fund special benefits.
(e) For a plan created after March 1, 2015, 50 percent of the insurance premium tax revenues must be used to fund defined benefit plan component benefits, with the remainder used to fund defined contribution plan component benefits.
(f) If a plan offers benefits in excess of the minimum benefits, such benefits, excluding supplemental plan benefits in effect as of September 30, 2014, may be reduced if the plan continues to meet minimum benefits and the minimum standards. The amount of insurance premium tax revenues previously used to fund benefits in excess of the minimum benefits before the reduction, excluding the amount of any additional premium tax revenues distributed to a supplemental plan for the 2012 calendar year, must be used as provided in paragraph (b). However, benefits in excess of the minimum benefits may not be reduced if a plan does not meet the minimum percentage amount of 2.75 percent of the average final compensation of a police officer or provides an effective benefit that is less than 2.75 percent as a result of a maximum benefit limitation, as described in s. 185.16(2)(b).
(g) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)-(f), the use of premium tax revenues, including any accumulations of additional premium tax revenues which have not been allocated to fund benefits in excess of the minimum benefits, may deviate from the provisions of this subsection by mutual consent of the members’ collective bargaining representative or, if none, by a majority of the police officer members of the fund, and by consent of the municipality, provided that the plan continues to meet minimum benefits and minimum standards; however, a plan that operates pursuant to this paragraph and does not meet the minimum benefits as of October 1, 2012, may continue to provide the benefits that do not meet the minimum benefits at the same level as was provided as of October 1, 2012, and all other benefit levels must continue to meet the minimum benefits. Such mutually agreed deviation must continue until modified or revoked by subsequent mutual consent of the members’ collective bargaining representative or, if none, by a majority of the police officer members of the fund, and the municipality. An existing arrangement for the use of premium tax revenues contained within a special act plan or a plan within a supplemental plan municipality is considered, as of July 1, 2015, to be a deviation for which mutual consent has been granted.
(2) The premium tax provided by this chapter must be used in its entirety to provide retirement benefits to police officers, or to police officers and firefighters if both are included. Local law plans created by special act before May 27, 1939, shall be deemed to comply with this chapter.
(3) A retirement plan or amendment to a retirement plan may not be proposed for adoption unless the proposed plan or amendment contains an actuarial estimate of the costs involved. Such proposed plan or proposed plan change may not be adopted without the approval of the municipality or, where required, the Legislature. Copies of the proposed plan or proposed plan change and the actuarial impact statement of the proposed plan or proposed plan change shall be furnished to the division before the last public hearing on the proposal is held. Such statement must also indicate whether the proposed plan or proposed plan change is in compliance with s. 14, Art. X of the State Constitution and those provisions of part VII of chapter 112 which are not expressly provided in this chapter. Notwithstanding any other provision, only those local law plans created by special act of legislation before May 27, 1939, are deemed to meet the minimum benefits and minimum standards in this chapter.
(4) Notwithstanding any other provision, with respect to any supplemental plan municipality:
(a) Section 185.02(6)(a) does not apply, and a local law plan and a supplemental plan may continue to use their definition of compensation or salary in existence on March 12, 1999.
(b) A local law plan and a supplemental plan must continue to be administered by a board or boards of trustees numbered, constituted, and selected as the board or boards were numbered, constituted, and selected on December 1, 2000.
(5) The retirement plan setting forth the benefits and the trust agreement, if any, covering the duties and responsibilities of the trustees and the regulations of the investment of funds must be in writing and copies made available to the participants and to the general public.
(6) In addition to the defined benefit component of the local law plan, each plan sponsor must have a defined contribution plan component within the local law plan by October 1, 2015, for noncollectively bargained service, upon entering into a collective bargaining agreement on or after July 1, 2015, or upon the creation date of a new participating plan. Depending upon the application of subsection (1), a defined contribution component may or may not receive any funding.
(7) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a municipality that has implemented or proposed changes to a local law plan based on the municipality’s reliance on an interpretation of this chapter by the Department of Management Services on or after August 14, 2012, and before March 3, 2015, may continue the implemented changes or continue to implement proposed changes. Such reliance must be evidenced by a written collective bargaining proposal or agreement, or formal correspondence between the municipality and the Department of Management Services which describes the specific changes to the local law plan, with the initial proposal, agreement, or correspondence from the municipality dated before March 3, 2015. Changes to the local law plan which are otherwise contrary to minimum benefits and minimum standards may continue in effect until the earlier of October 1, 2018, or the effective date of a collective bargaining agreement that is contrary to the changes to the local law plan.
History.s. 7, ch. 59-320; s. 2, ch. 61-119; s. 3, ch. 63-196; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 23, ch. 86-42; s. 47, ch. 93-193; s. 956, ch. 95-147; s. 74, ch. 99-1; s. 7, ch. 2002-66; s. 6, ch. 2004-21; s. 11, ch. 2011-216; s. 14, ch. 2015-39; s. 31, ch. 2020-2.

F.S. 185.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 185.35 on CourtListener

Amendments to 185.35


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 185.35

Total Results: 12

City of St. Petersburg v. Remia

41 So. 3d 322, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10448, 2010 WL 2788287

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2010 | Docket: 2398105

Cited 5 times | Published

interest, less any benefits paid to him or her. Section 185.35 requires municipalities with their own police

STATE, DEPARTMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES v. City of Delray Beach

40 So. 3d 835, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10143, 2010 WL 2732873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2010 | Docket: 1667094

Cited 1 times | Published

99-1, § 74, at 61, Laws of Fla. (amending section 185.35) (emphasis added). Cf Ch. 99-1, § 35, at 29

City of Wilton Manors v. Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement

48 So. 3d 962, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18309, 2010 WL 4861747

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2010 | Docket: 2399255

Published

[e.s.] § 185.10(2), Fla. Stat. (2009); see also § 185.35, Fla. Stat. (2009) (requiring local law plans

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 21, 2001 | Docket: 3256304

Published

included.3 A similar provision is contained in section 185.35, Florida Statutes. Section 175.351, Florida

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 3, 1993 | Docket: 3258036

Published

trustees of a firefighters' pension trust fund. 3 Section 185.35, F.S., allows municipalities with their own

Haddix v. City of Panama City

624 So. 2d 801, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9532, 1993 WL 380137

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1993 | Docket: 64743092

Published

the retirement benefits required. Further, section 185.35(1)(i) also requires the City to fund any actuarial

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 8, 1991 | Docket: 3256105

Published

creating a new fund under s. 185.35, F.S.7 Section 185.35, F.S., sets forth the minimum standards for

City of Coral Springs v. Desepio

524 So. 2d 1047, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1222, 1988 WL 25782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1988 | Docket: 64634710

Published

Judge, dissenting. I believe the provisions of section 185.35, Florida Statutes (1979) permitted the city

City of Hollywood v. Hollywood Lodge 21

329 So. 2d 366, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1976 | Docket: 64553006

Published

the Police Pension Plan.” As amended in 1959, Section 185.35, F. S., provides in section (1) that in order

Gates v. City of Jacksonville

278 So. 2d 645, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1973 | Docket: 64532631

Published

F.S.A.) on or before June 1 of each year. Section 185.35, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., allows the cities

Bailey v. City of Tampa

175 So. 2d 533, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3168

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1965 | Docket: 64493187

Published

plan which met the standards prescribed in F.S. § 185.35, F.S.A.; that the taxes levied on insurance premiums

Bailey v. City of Tampa

163 So. 2d 528, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4212

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1964 | Docket: 60221332

Published

standard set forth in the *531enabling act (Section 185.35), the income from the taxes levied on insurance