Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 196.1975 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 196.1975 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 196.1975

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 196
EXEMPTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 196.1975
196.1975 Exemption for property used by nonprofit homes for the aged.Nonprofit homes for the aged are exempt to the extent that they meet the following criteria:
(1) The applicant must be a corporation not for profit pursuant to chapter 617 or a Florida limited partnership, the sole general partner of which is a corporation not for profit pursuant to chapter 617, and the corporation not for profit must have been exempt as of January 1 of the year for which exemption from ad valorem property taxes is requested from federal income taxation by having qualified as an exempt charitable organization under the provisions of s. 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 or of the corresponding section of a subsequently enacted federal revenue act.
(2) A facility will not qualify as a “home for the aged” unless at least 75 percent of the occupants are over the age of 62 years or totally and permanently disabled. For homes for the aged which are exempt from paying income taxes to the United States as specified in subsection (1), licensing by the Agency for Health Care Administration is required for ad valorem tax exemption hereunder only if the home:
(a) Furnishes medical facilities or nursing services to its residents, or
(b) Qualifies as an assisted living facility under chapter 429.
(3) Those portions of the home for the aged which are devoted exclusively to the conduct of religious services or the rendering of nursing or medical services are exempt from ad valorem taxation.
(4)(a) After removing the assessed value exempted in subsection (3), units or apartments in homes for the aged shall be exempt only to the extent that residency in the existing unit or apartment of the applicant home is reserved for or restricted to or the unit or apartment is occupied by persons who have resided in the applicant home and in good faith made this state their permanent residence as of January 1 of the year in which exemption is claimed and who also meet the requirements set forth in one of the following subparagraphs:
1. Persons who have gross incomes of not more than $7,200 per year and who are 62 years of age or older.
2. Couples, one of whom must be 62 years of age or older, having a combined gross income of not more than $8,000 per year, or the surviving spouse thereof, who lived with the deceased at the time of the deceased’s death in a home for the aged.
3. Persons who are totally and permanently disabled and who have gross incomes of not more than $7,200 per year.
4. Couples, one or both of whom are totally and permanently disabled, having a combined gross income of not more than $8,000 per year, or the surviving spouse thereof, who lived with the deceased at the time of the deceased’s death in a home for the aged.

However, the income limitations do not apply to totally and permanently disabled veterans, provided they meet the requirements of s. 196.081.

(b) The maximum income limitations permitted in this subsection shall be adjusted, effective January 1 each year, by the percentage change in the average cost-of-living index in the period January 1 through December 31 of the immediate prior year compared with the same period for the year prior to that. The index is the average of the monthly consumer price index figures for the stated 12-month period, relative to the United States as a whole, issued by the United States Department of Labor.
(c) Each not-for-profit corporation applying for an exemption under paragraph (a) must file with its annual application for exemption an affidavit approved by the Department of Revenue from each person who occupies a unit or apartment which states the person’s income. The affidavit is prima facie evidence of the person’s income. The corporation is not required to provide an affidavit from a resident who is a totally and permanently disabled veteran who meets the requirements of s. 196.081. If, at a later time, the property appraiser determines that additional documentation proving an affiant’s income is necessary, the property appraiser may request such documentation.
(5) Nonprofit housing projects that are financed by a mortgage loan made or insured by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development under s. 202, s. 202 with a s. 8 subsidy, s. 221(d)(3) or (4), or s. 236 of the National Housing Act, as amended, and that are subject to the income limitations established by that department are exempt from ad valorem taxation.
(6) For the purposes of this section, gross income includes social security benefits payable to the person or couple or assigned to an organization designated specifically for the support or benefit of that person or couple.
(7) It is declared to be the intent of the Legislature that subsection (3) implements the ad valorem tax exemption authorized in the third sentence of s. 3(a), Art. VII, State Constitution, and the remaining subsections implement s. 6(c), Art. VII, State Constitution, for purposes of granting such exemption to homes for the aged.
(8) Physical occupancy on January 1 is not required in those instances in which a home restricts occupancy to persons meeting the income requirements specified in this section. Those portions of a property failing to meet those requirements shall qualify for an alternative exemption as provided in subsection (9). In a home in which at least 25 percent of the units or apartments of the home are restricted to or occupied by persons meeting the income requirements specified in this section, the common areas of that home are exempt from taxation.
(9)(a) Each unit or apartment of a home for the aged not exempted in subsection (3) or subsection (4), which is operated by a not for profit corporation and is owned by such corporation or leased by such corporation from a health facilities authority pursuant to part III of chapter 154 or an industrial development authority pursuant to part III of chapter 159, and which property is used by such home for the aged for the purposes for which it was organized, is exempt from all ad valorem taxation, except for assessments for special benefits, to the extent of $25,000 of assessed valuation of such property for each apartment or unit:
1. Which is used by such home for the aged for the purposes for which it was organized; and
2. Which is occupied, on January 1 of the year in which exemption from ad valorem property taxation is requested, by a person who resides therein and in good faith makes the same his or her permanent home.
(b) Each corporation applying for an exemption under paragraph (a) of this subsection or paragraph (4)(a) must file with the annual application for exemption an affidavit from each person who occupies a unit or apartment for which an exemption under either of those paragraphs is claimed stating that the person resides therein and in good faith makes that unit or apartment his or her permanent residence.
(10) Homes for the aged, or life care communities, however designated, which are financed through the sale of health facilities authority bonds or bonds of any other public entity, whether on a sale-leaseback basis, a sale-repurchase basis, or other financing arrangement, or which are financed without public-entity bonds, are exempt from ad valorem taxation only in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(11) Any portion of such property used for nonexempt purposes may be valued and placed upon the tax rolls separately from any portion entitled to exemption pursuant to this chapter.
(12) When it becomes necessary for the property appraiser to determine the value of a unit, he or she shall include in such valuation the proportionate share of the common areas, including the land, fairly attributable to such unit, based upon the value of such unit in relation to all other units in the home, unless the common areas are otherwise exempted by subsection (8).
(13) Sections 196.195 and 196.196 do not apply to this section.
History.s. 12, ch. 76-234; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 1, ch. 77-448; s. 87, ch. 79-400; s. 3, ch. 80-261; s. 53, ch. 80-274; s. 13, ch. 81-219; s. 1, ch. 82-133; s. 9, ch. 82-399; s. 8, ch. 83-71; s. 2, ch. 84-138; s. 27, ch. 85-80; s. 1, ch. 87-332; s. 46, ch. 91-45; s. 999, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 95-210; s. 2, ch. 95-383; s. 141, ch. 95-418; s. 9, ch. 96-397; s. 19, ch. 99-8; s. 2, ch. 99-208; s. 10, ch. 2001-137; s. 1, ch. 2001-208; s. 7, ch. 2006-197; s. 27, ch. 2010-5; s. 5, ch. 2017-36; s. 34, ch. 2019-3.

F.S. 196.1975 on Google Scholar

F.S. 196.1975 on Casetext

Amendments to 196.1975


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 196.1975
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 196.1975.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 196.1975

Total Results: 15

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2007-03-30

Snippet: exempt from ad valorem taxes." (e.s.) Section 196.1975, Florida Statutes, allows an exemption for property

Fairhaven South, Inc. v. McIntyre

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-08-17

Citation: 793 So. 2d 110, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11509, 2001 WL 930156

Snippet: aged who meet qualifications specified in section 196.1975, Florida Statutes (1995). Fairhaven possesses

Atlantic Gulf Communities Corporation v. City of Port St. Lucie

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-05-12

Citation: 764 So. 2d 14, 1999 WL 123532

Snippet: consistently with these meanings. See, e.g., §§ 196.1975(4)(b) & (6), 215.422(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). Atlantic

Freedom Properties v. Alderman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-11-15

Citation: 589 So. 2d 424, 1991 WL 237693

Snippet: University Village operates for profit. Cf. § 196.1975, Fla.Stat. (1989) (providing an exemption for

Markham v. John Knox Village of Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-08-23

Citation: 547 So. 2d 1044, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1969, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4672, 1989 WL 97534

Snippet: the assessed value of each unit, under section 196.1975(8)(a), Florida Statutes (1985).1 We affirm. It

Markham v. Evangelical Covenant Church of America

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-02-26

Citation: 502 So. 2d 1239, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 1567, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 112

Snippet: District found the “income test” set forth in section 196.1975(4), Florida Statutes (1985), unconstitutional

Evangelical Covenant Church of America v. Bauer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-02-05

Citation: 482 So. 2d 551, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 362, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6210

Snippet: court found that the “income test” in section 196.1975(4), Florida Statutes (1985), was constitutional

Jones v. Life Care of Baptist Hospital, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-09-25

Citation: 476 So. 2d 726, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16117, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2249

Snippet: appellee’s potential tax exemption under section 196.1975, Florida Statutes. Our review of the complaint

Daniel v. Canterbury Towers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-01-30

Citation: 462 So. 2d 497

Snippet: constitutional challenge to section 196.012(6) and section 196.1975, Florida Statutes (1979). The essential basis

Williams v. Delta Upsilon Fraternity

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-01-11

Citation: 462 So. 2d 552, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 158

Snippet: Tile-Sikes Corp. v. Roberts, IRC Order 2-2750, 9 FCR 196 (1975). Nevertheless, we find that the parties submitted

Whirley v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-05-17

Citation: 450 So. 2d 836

Snippet: (1971); State v. Young, 194 Neb. 544, 234 N.W.2d 196 (1975); Hamilton v. Walker, 65 N.M. 470, 340 P.2d 407

Miller v. BD. OF PENS. OF UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-05-19

Citation: 431 So. 2d 350

Snippet: the constitutionality vel non of section *351 196.1975, Florida Statutes (1979), a tax exemption statute

HG BODDIFORD PAINTING CONS., INC. v. Boddiford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-02-10

Citation: 426 So. 2d 1243

Snippet: on Florida Tile-Sikes Corp. v. Roberts, 9 FCR 196 (1975), for the proposition that a voluntary acceptance

Yamaha International Corp. v. Ehrman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-08-08

Citation: 318 So. 2d 196, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13800

Snippet: 318 So.2d 196 (1975) YAMAHA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Robert EHRMAN et al., Respondents

State Ex Rel. Blatt v. PANELFAB INT'L. CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-06-10

Citation: 314 So. 2d 196

Snippet: 314 So.2d 196 (1975) The STATE of Florida, On Relation of Gerson BLATT, Appellant, v. PANELFAB INTERNATIONAL