Cases from cite.case.law:

TURNER, v. OM FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., 822 F. Supp. 2d 633 (W.D. La. 2011)

. . . Jacques’ policy was $198.14, and the monthly deduction at the time was approximately $938.00. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ORTEGA,, 150 F.3d 937 (8th Cir. 1998)

. . . January 25 transaction involved 50.76 grams of such a mixture, and the January 28 transaction involved 198.14 . . .

In FERGUSON, Sr. FERGUSON, Sr. v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,, 83 B.R. 676 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 1988)

. . . $1,361.00 for unpaid income taxes for the tax year ending December 31, 1984, plus a negligence penalty of $198.14 . . .

UHL v. NESS CITY, KANSAS, 406 F. Supp. 1012 (D. Kan. 1975)

. . . In addition, the accounting reflects an expenditure of $198.14 in expenses. . . . circumstances, and that an award of this sum, plus provision for reimbursement of expenses in the sum of $198.14 . . . plaintiffs’ counsel in the sum of $1,000.00, plus reimbursement of expenses advanced in the sum of $198.14 . . .

MARYLAND DREDGING CONTRACTING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 66 Ct. Cl. 627 (Ct. Cl. 1929)

. . . Excess deductions made for ’ inspection and superin-tendence_ 198.14 4. . . . Item (3), $198.14, was allowed by the War Department and also by the Comptroller General of the United . . .

COVINGTON COUNTY, ALA. v. STEVENS STEVENS v. COVINGTON COUNTY, ALA., 256 F. 328 (5th Cir. 1919)

. . . To the demand for judgment on the warrant for $4,-198.14, the plaintiff pleaded that there was no allegation . . .