The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 201
EXCISE TAX ON DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 201.13

201.13 Department of Revenue to furnish stamps for tax for specified period.—Except as otherwise provided in ss. 201.132 and 201.133, through March 31, 1997, the Department of Revenue shall cause to be prepared and distributed for the payment of the taxes prescribed in this chapter suitable stamps denoting the tax on the documents to which same are required to be affixed and shall prescribe such method for the affixing of the stamps as shall be necessary to carry out and comply with the intent and purpose of this chapter. Persons holding documentary stamps after March 31, 1997, may continue to use those stamps to pay the tax.

History.—s. 3, ch. 15787, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 1279(114); ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 4, ch. 81-14; s. 12, ch. 96-395.

F.S. 201.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 201.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 201.13

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 201.13

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 201.13.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MILLEPEDE MARKETING LIMITED, v. J. HARSLEY,, 928 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . PL’s Opp’n at 7 (quoting The Patent Office’s Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (“MPEP”) § 201.13). . . .

LUBLIN CORPORATION, t a v. UNITED STATES,, 84 Fed. Cl. 678 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . . § 1-201.13 (1983). . . .

JOHNSON, v. GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,, 584 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . See D.C.Code §§ 24-201.13; 24-201.14. . . .

v. S. P. A. S. A. I. C. JFE Co. Co., 32 Ct. Int'l Trade 832 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . . § 201.13(b)(2). Five year review hearings are non-adjudicative and subject to this regulation. . . .

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES, S. P. A. S. A. I. C. JFE Co. Co., 572 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . . § 201.13(b)(2). Five year review hearings are non-adjudicative and subject to this regulation. . . .

ABDULLAHI, M. u a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a u a a a a v. PFIZER, INC., 77 F. App'x 48 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . .”); see also Weinstein’s Federal Evidence § 201.13[l][b] (“Courts will not take judicial notice of factual . . .

NMB PTE NSK- RHP RHP NSK SKF USA SKF S. p. A. SKF S. A. SKF NTN NTN NTN NTN NTN- BCA NTN U. K. FAG S. p. A. FAG AG FAG v. U. S., 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 1325 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . . § 201.13(f)(1) (1996) clearly indicates that ‘information produced at the hearing and arguments thereon . . . Timken further maintains that NTN incorrectly cited to 19 C.F.R. § 201.13(i)(l) for NTN’s proposition . . . that 19 C.F.R. § 207.67 (2000) applies in this case because “[t]he provision NTN cited [19 C.F.R. § 201.13 . . .

NMB SINGAPORE LTD. PTE NSK- RHP RHP NSK SKF USA SKF S. p. A. SKF S. A. SKF NTN NTN NTN NTN NTN- BCA NTN THE U. K. FAG S. p. A. FAG AG FAG v. UNITED STATES, U. S., 288 F. Supp. 2d 1306 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . . § 201.13(i)(1) (1996) clearly indicates that ‘information produced at the hearing and arguments thereon . . . Timken further maintains that NTN incorrectly cited to 19 C.F.R. § 201.13(i)(l) for NTN’s proposition . . . that 19 C.F.R. § 207.67 (2000) applies in this case because "[t]he provision NTN cited [19 C.F.R. § 201.13 . . .

MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 57 Fed. Cl. 665 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . . § 1-201.13 (1983) (emphasis added). . . .

BEGZATOWSKI, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 278 F.3d 665 (7th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 201.13(b)(1)(D). . . .

R. RUSHING v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY,, 185 F.3d 496 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . . § 201.13 (standard for rail car operations); id. § 201.14 (standard for retarders); id. § 201.15 (standard . . .

J. WASHINGTON v. S. APFEL,, 40 F. Supp. 2d 326 (D. Md. 1999)

. . . The ALJ then applied Vocational Rule 201.13 of Table No. 2, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations No. 4 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. C. BARBER A., 993 F. Supp. 138 (N.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . . § 201.13; a $1,415.12 surcharge as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 3011; and $120.00 in court filing fees as . . .

WHITNEY HOLDINGS, LTD. v. GIVOTOVSKY a k a I., 988 F. Supp. 732 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . of equitable estoppel to extend the applicable period of limitations”); Weinstein, supra note 62, ¶ 201.13 . . .

GRUPO INDUSTRIAL CAMESA, v. UNITED STATES, Of, 85 F.3d 1577 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 201.13(b)(1), which provides that “[pjublic hearings or conferences in nonadjudicative investigations . . . appeal to this court, Camesa argues that the Court of International Trade’s reliance on 19 C.F.R. § 201.13 . . . On the other hand, § 201.13, provides that hearings in nonadjudicative investigations will be conducted . . .

TRANSCO PRODUCTS INC. v. PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING, INC., 38 F.3d 551 (Fed. Cir. 1994)

. . . See The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), §§ 201.03-201.13 (1988); D. . . .

v., 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 461 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . nonadjudicative investigations will be conducted by the Commission or by one or more Commissioners.” 19 C.F.R § 201.13 . . . in nature, the Commission’s regulation regarding the conduct of such hearing applies, see 19 C.F.R § 201.13 . . .

GRUPO INDUSTRIAL CAMESA, v. UNITED STATES,, 853 F. Supp. 440 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . . § 201.13(b)(1) (1993) (emphasis added). . . . See 19 C.F.R. § 201.13(b)(1). . . .

A. JOHNSON, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 758 F. Supp. 1496 (N.D. Ga. 1991)

. . . . § 201.13. . . .

COKER, v. Dr. W. SULLIVAN, U. S., 902 F.2d 84 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 201.13(b). . . .

COKER, v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 715 F. Supp. 383 (D.D.C. 1989)

. . . .-10-201.13 (review and audit). . . . The provisions in §§ 201.10 —201.13 provide the basis for determining that action under § 201.6 is necessary . . .

A. PERALES, v. M. HECKLER,, 762 F.2d 226 (2d Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 201.13 (1984) provides: After consideration of a State agency’s appeal [of proper audit exceptions . . .

A. PERALES, v. M. HECKLER,, 611 F. Supp. 333 (N.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . . § 201.13 (1983) also requires that adjustments be made for claims in which it is determined that the . . .

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 708 F.2d 627 (11th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 201.13 (1982), GDMA asked the Departmental Grant Appeals Board to reconsider HHS’s decision. . . . formal than those applicable where the state challenges a noncompliance determination. 45 C.F.R. § 201.13 . . .

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, v. DEPARTMENTAL GRANT APPEALS BOARD OF UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 698 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 201.13. . . . payments “in which it [has been] found that the Federal Government may not participate.” 45 C.F.R. § 201.13 . . .

KNAYSI Ed v. A. H. ROBINS COMPANY,, 679 F.2d 1366 (11th Cir. 1982)

. . . Chiappa, supra; 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac. par. 201.13. . . . 18 N.Y.2d 125, 272 N.Y.S.2d 337, 219 N.E.2d 169 (1966); 1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y.Civ.Prac. par. 201.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARGO EXPORT CORPORATION,, 675 F.2d 511 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . . §§ 201.13, 201.15, 201.32, 201.71. . . .

BARRETT, v. HOFFMAN, BARRETT, v. UNITED STATES BARRETT, v. M. ARTHUR,, 521 F. Supp. 307 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)

. . . Prac. par. 201.13). . . .

PASCO TERMINALS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 634 F.2d 610 (C.C.P.A. 1980)

. . . Any person who has entered an appearance in accordance with § 201.13 may, with the permission of the . . .

v., 68 C.C.P.A. 8 (C.C.P.A. 1980)

. . . Any person who has entered an appearance in accordance with § 201.13 may, with the permission of the . . .

SOLOMON, M. D. Ph. D. v. A. CALIFANO, Jr. A., 464 F. Supp. 1203 (D. Md. 1979)

. . . . § 201.13. See 45 C.F.R. §§ 201.6(d)-(f). . . . Sections 201.13-201.14 of 45 C.F.R. permit the Administrator to disallow state claims for federal financial . . . 201.6 and provide the State with an opportunity for a hearing as outlined in 45 C.F.R. §§ 201.6(d) and 201.13 . . .

CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, a v. CITY OF DOVER, a, 450 F. Supp. 966 (D. Del. 1978)

. . . .-11, 201.12 and 201.13 (1976). . . . So far as the language of sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 is concerned, the scope of the regulations . . . arguing that it supports its view that the noise standards specified in sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 . . . railway cars in marshalling yards was preempted by the federal regulation sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 . . . Not only do sections 201.11, 201.12 and 201.13 apply to locomotives and rail cars but also to sound produced . . .

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS, v. M. COSTLE,, 562 F.2d 1310 (D.C. Cir. 1977)

. . . . §§ 201.11, 201.12, 201.13. . 42 U.S.C. § 4916. . Id. . . . . Id. at § 201.13. . . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF STATE OF TEXAS v. A. CALIFANO, Jr., 556 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . Section 201.13(a) also provides: Expenditures in which it is found the Federal Government may not participate . . .

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA v. W. WEINBERGER,, 520 F.2d 344 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 201.13(a)), the purpose of such audits and deductions is not to implement a retroactive disapproval . . . issue of, a suit to enjoin deductions based on “audit exceptions” within the meaning of 45 C.F.R. § 201.13 . . .

LOCAL UNION INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL- CIO, v. ARTKRAFT, INC., 375 F. Supp. 129 (E.D. Wis. 1974)

. . . The employers refused, however, claiming that the Pay Board regulation § 201.13, issued on January 27 . . . On July 7, 1972, the District Director replied setting forth the requirements of § 201.13(b) of the Pay . . . Section 201.13(b) of the regulations is the major source of conflict between the parties. . . . Amendments, the most reasonable interpretation of § 201.13(b) is that if the conditions set forth in . . . Defendants rely on § 201.13(b) (4) (ii) which only applies when the wage increase exceeds 7%, which is . . .

LOCAL NURSING HOME, HOSPITAL, SENIOR CITIZENS HOTEL UNION, v. HIALEAH CONVALESCENT HOME, INC. a, 348 F. Supp. 405 (S.D. Fla. 1972)

. . . But under Pay Board regulation § 201.13 issued on November 13, 1971, all such retroactive payments required . . . Pay Board regulation § 201.13, “Scheduled increases in wages and salaries for services rendered after . . . Yet the possibility of an exception was left open by subsection 201.13(c) for cases where “it is demonstrated . . . ruled as follows: “For purposes of permitting retro-activity in cases of severe inequities under § 201.13 . . .

POTTER v. McQUEENEY, 338 F. Supp. 1133 (D.R.I. 1972)

. . . Plaintiff was suspended under Regulation 201.13 of the Providence Police Department, which reads Neatness . . .

SCHMITT J. v. C. BABCOCK E., 377 F.2d 994 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . P. sections 201.13 and 201.15. . . .

J. v. C. E., 54 C.C.P.A. 1392 (C.C.P.A. 1967)

. . . that they have not fulfilled the conditions required by 35 USC 119, as elucidated in M.P.E.P. sections 201.13 . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. BLAND, SACHS,, 159 F. Supp. 395 (D. Md. 1958)

. . . Sec. 201.13(d) (3). . . .

FERTILE CO- OP. DAIRY ASS N v. HUSTON,, 33 F. Supp. 712 (N.D. Iowa 1940)

. . . Total 1936 11/30/38 18149.61 $37.40 $18.25 $205.26 2.31 .58 2.89 1937 11/30/38 1 153.51 38.38 9.24 201.13 . . .