The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 201
EXCISE TAX ON DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 201.22

201.22 Financing statements under chapter 679 of the Uniform Commercial Code.—The excise tax on documents provided by this chapter shall be applicable to transactions covered by the Uniform Commercial Code to the same extent that it would be if the code had not been enacted. The clerk or filing officer shall not accept for filing or filing and recording any financing statement under chapter 679, unless there appears thereon a notation that the taxes required by this chapter have been paid on the promissory instruments secured by said financing statement and will be paid on any additional promissory instruments, advances, or similar instrument that may be secured by said financing statement. The failure to pay the tax required by this chapter, as so stated, shall be subject to the penalties provided by this chapter.

History.—s. 1, ch. 65-254; s. 16, ch. 96-395.

F.S. 201.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 201.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 201.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 201.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 201.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

T. LYNCH, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 368 F. Supp. 3d 292 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . . ; see also Rules 201.17-201.22. . . .

J. BARNES, v. A. BERRYHILL,, 895 F.3d 702 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . In addition to the two Grid rules cited by the ALJ, she relies on Grid rules 201.22 and 201.29. . . . Rule 201.22 states that a person of the same age who has the same education and work experience but also . . .

In CAMTECH PRECISION MANUFACTURING, INC. v., 471 B.R. 293 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . Such forms must be in accord with the requirements of Florida law, including s. 201.22. . . .

L. HOUSE, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 32 F. Supp. 3d 138 (N.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . exist in the national economy that Plaintiff can perform, the ALJ used Medical-Vocational Rules 201.21, 201.22 . . .

W. O DELL M. O v. J. ASTRUE,, 736 F. Supp. 2d 378 (D.N.H. 2010)

. . . (Tr. at 21, citing Rules 201.27-29, 201.21 and 201.22). . . .

PRETTY, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 696 F. Supp. 2d 170 (D. Conn. 2010)

. . . sedentary work, a finding of ‘not disabled’ would be directed by Medical-Vocational Rules 201.21 and 201.22 . . .

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED, Co. CAL IV LLC, d b a U. S. B. d b a X- F d LLC, LLC, v. INC. LLC, 633 F. Supp. 2d 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . . § 201.22). . . . See 17 U.S.C. § 411(c)(1); 37 C.F.R. § 201.22(c). . . .

VILLANO, v. J. ASTRUE,, 556 F.3d 558 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . P, App. 2, Rules 201.18 to 201.22. . . .

R. HEMMINGER, v. ASTRUE,, 590 F. Supp. 2d 1073 (W.D. Wis. 2008)

. . . Applying Rule 201.22 of the guidelines, the administrative law judge found that plaintiff would not be . . .

JUSTICE, v. ASTRUE,, 576 F. Supp. 2d 195 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2 (Rule 5201.17-201.22); (9) considering Justice’s age, education, work . . .

FRANZEN, v. J. ASTRUE,, 555 F. Supp. 2d 720 (W.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . The ALJ stated her decision was appropriate under the framework of Medical-Vocational Rule 201.22. . . .

W. McCANTS, v. J. ASTRUE,, 493 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (S.D. Ala. 2007)

. . . and other evidence, that while Plaintiff cannot perform her past relevant work (“PRW”), under Rule 201.22 . . .

W. WASSON, v. MEDIA GENERAL, INC. a, 446 F. Supp. 2d 579 (E.D. Va. 2006)

. . . * A finding of “disabled” may therefore be reached within the framework of medical-vocational rule 201.22 . . .

E. JOHNSON, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 397 F. Supp. 2d 1122 (S.D. Iowa 2005)

. . . In making the fifth step finding, the ALJ relied on Medical-Vocational Rules 201.21 and 201.22. . . .

F. HURLEY, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 385 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . Accordingly, the ALJ applied Medical-Vocational Guidelines [“Grids”] Rules 202.21 — 201.22, which directed . . .

L. HUHTA, v. Jo B. BARNHART, As, 328 F. Supp. 2d 377 (W.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . See 20 C.F.R. part 404, subpart P, appendix 2, Rule 201.22. V. . . .

MCDANIEL, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 375 F. Supp. 2d 975 (E.D. Cal. 2004)

. . . Even if the claimant were limited to no more than the full range of sedentary work, Rules 201.21 and 201.22 . . .

ZENECA, INCORPORATED, v. E. SHALALA, M. D. v., 213 F.3d 161 (4th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 201.22 to the label of Gensia’s propofol with Sulfite would violate the statutory “same labeling” . . . Section 201.22(b) of the FDA’s regulations requires that prescription drugs containing sulfites shall . . . Sulfite sensitivity is seen more frequently in asthmatic than in nonasthmatic people.” 21 C.F.R. § 201.22 . . . may cause allergic-type reactions in certain susceptible persons, especially asthmatics.” 21 C.F.R. § 201.22 . . . Id. § 201.22(b). . . . .

SAVIANO, Jr. v. S. CHATER,, 956 F. Supp. 1061 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . residual functional capacity for sedentary work, Rules 201.28 and/or 201.29 and Rules 201.21 and/or 201.22 . . .

KOSECK, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 865 F. Supp. 1000 (W.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . P, Appendix 2, Rule 201.21, 201.22. . . . The ALJ referred to Rule 201.21 and 201.22 of the regulations which provide that individuals between . . . Pt. 404, Subpart P, App. 2, §§ 201.21, 201.22 (1993). . . .

E. GATHRIGHT, v. E. SHALALA,, 872 F. Supp. 893 (D.N.M. 1993)

. . . Section 200.00(a), Appendix 2 of Regulations No. 4 and Social Security Ruling 83-11) Rules 201.21, 201.22 . . . Since the claimant’s medical-vocational profile matches the above factors, Rules 201.21, 201.22, 201.28 . . . Reference to Rule(s) 201.21, 201.22, 201.28 and 201.29, Table No. 1, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . .

J. C. SMACZNIAK, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 998 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . $1,114 0 $3,183.09 EXCESS WITHHOLDING: $2,069.09 (not barred by statute of limitations) 1983 $2,092 $201.22 . . .

CARUTHERS v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 800 F. Supp. 670 (N.D. Ind. 1992)

. . . sedentary work, and the claimant’s age, education, and work experience, section 404.1569 and Rules 201.29, 201.22 . . .

G. HARGIS, v. W. SULLIVAN,, 945 F.2d 1482 (10th Cir. 1991)

. . . The administrative law judge found that Rule 201.22 of the grids, which assesses jobs in the national . . .

CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. v. VIDEO MONITORING SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC., 940 F.2d 1471 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 201.22. . . . . See 37 C.F.R. § 201.22(a)(2). . . . . The procedure under 17 U.S.C. § 411(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 201.22 (concerning "advance notice of potential . . .

CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 883 F.2d 537 (7th Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 201.22(k). Until the Commission has “entered” an “order”, there is nothing to review. . . .

NEWELL, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 812 F.2d 1259 (9th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 201.22(k). . . . I suggest that a fairer interpretation of 17 C.F.R. § 201.22(k) would make the caption date the entry . . . . § 201.22(k) (1985), states: In computing any period of time involving the date of the entry of an order . . .

ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 746 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 201.22 (1983). . . .

ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 746 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 201.22 (1983). . . .

A. MUNKS, v. HECKLER, U. S., 580 F. Supp. 871 (N.D. Ill. 1984)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Table No. 1, § 201.22, which determines whether, in light of plaintiff’s . . .

GRAHAM, v. M. HECKLER,, 580 F. Supp. 1238 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . In reaching the conclusion that there was such work, the AU found Rule 201.22 of Table No. 1 of Appendix . . . that the ALJ’s findings refer to Rule 201.21 as applicable and the text of his decision refers to Rule 201.22 . . .

ANDERSON, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 634 F. Supp. 967 (D. Mass. 1984)

. . . plaintiff had a severe impairment, the AU went on to consider the vocational factors outlined in Rule 201.22 . . . Applying Rule 201.22 to plaintiff’s characteristics, the AU concluded that plaintiff was not disabled . . . See id., Rule 201.22. III. . . .

ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 33 B.R. 394 (S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Without any Florida authority to guide the Bankruptcy Court’s determination, it interpreted §§ 201.01 and 201.22 . . .

In KARL A. NEISE, INC. CONTINENTAL BANK, v. S. FREEHLING, A., 31 B.R. 409 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 201.22, which provides, inter alia, that the clerk or filing officer shall not accept for filing . . .

In AAA MACHINE COMPANY, INC. EQUILEASE CORPORATION, a v. AAA MACHINE COMPANY, INC. B., 30 B.R. 323 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . . § 201.22. . . . Florida Statute § 201.22 states that “The clerk or filing officer shall not accept for filing or filing . . .

STEINHOFF, v. R. HARRIS,, 698 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1983)

. . . .-20, 201.22, 201.26, 201.29. . . .

In SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION, ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, v. SEL- O- RAK CORPORATION,, 26 B.R. 223 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 1982)

. . . Sec. 201.22 provides: .. . . . . Sec. 201.22 is mandatory; the clerk “shall not” accept for filing a financing statement without a notation . . .

WILLIFORD, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 550 F. Supp. 248 (S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . is true that the ALJ, as Defendant observes, referred to the vocational expert’s testimony and Rule 201.22 . . .

R. ROACH, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 543 F. Supp. 976 (S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . In reaching his conclusion, the ALJ applied Rule 201.22 of the medical-vocational (or “grid”) guidelines . . . However, the Magistrate further held that Rule 201.22 does not fully apply when an individual claims . . .

GEORGIA- PACIFIC CORPORATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE, 410 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 201.22, Fla.Stats., enacted by the Florida Legislature in 1965 as a part of the same bill that . . . originally enacted the Uniform Commercial Code, reads, in pertinent part, as follows: 201.22 “The excise . . . Faced with Section 201.22 which says that the documentary excise tax is to be applied to transactions . . .

A. WANDER v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 523 F. Supp. 1086 (D. Md. 1981)

. . . The fact that the ALJ’s purported findings may match the criteria set out in Rule 201.22 or Rule 201.29 . . .

SIERRA CLUB, a v. HARDIN, P. U. S. W. H. N. J. U. S., 325 F. Supp. 99 (D. Alaska 1971)

. . . timber sale, the Forest Service issued a special use permit to U.S.P. for construction of the mill on 201.22 . . . Plaintiffs attack the issuance by the Forest Service on April 24, 1970 of a 201.22 acre permit for the . . .

MEDICAL COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 432 F.2d 659 (D.D.C. 1970)

. . . . § 201.22(k) (1970), which provides : In computing any period of time involving the date of the entry . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, v. QUINN BROTHERS OF JACKSON, INC., 384 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1967)

. . . . § 201.22. . . .

K. LILE, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 324 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1963)

. . . Commission directs that “a docket of all proceedings shall be maintained by the Commission” [17 C.F.R. 201.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA,, 270 F.2d 50 (2d Cir. 1959)

. . . Although there is sharp dispute as to whether Section 201.22 of Regulation I is a price setting rule . . . The section of Regulation 1 relied upon reads, in part (§ 201.22(e) (2)): “A price for a purchase * * . . . ECA Regulation 3, Section 201.22(a) as amended May 3, 3949 provides: “Scope of this section. (1) Section . . . ECA Regulation 1, Section 201.22(e) (2) provides: “Unlisted commodities. . . . Section 201.22(b) (2) provides: “The term ‘comparable sale’ includes all sales which are comparable as . . .

UNITED STATES v. EIN CHEMICAL CORPORATION, M., 161 F. Supp. 238 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)

. . . 1 of the Economic Cooperation Administration, amended May 3, 1949, 14 F.R. 2166, § 201.19(d) and § 201.22 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA,, 155 F. Supp. 121 (S.D.N.Y. 1957)

. . . (a) (1) and the comparable sales provisions, (§ 201.22(e) (2)). . . . The comparable sales test is set forth in § 201.22(e) (2) of Regulation 1. . . . A comparable sale is defined in § 201.22(b) 2. . . . The government has no claim with respect to § 201.22(e) (2) (iii). . . . Nor can any claim be based upon § 201.22(e) (2) (ii). . . .

UNITED STATES v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY, 136 F. Supp. 345 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . Reg. 2166, Regulation 1, Sec. 201.22(e) (2), and were inserted therein by the Ad- . ministrator by amendment . . .

GROUP PUBLISHERS, v. WINCHELL EAGLE- LION FILMS,, 86 F. Supp. 573 (S.D.N.Y. 1949)

. . . The Rules and Regulations of the Copyright Office, Section 201.22(c), 17 U.S.C.A. following section 207 . . .