The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 201
EXCISE TAX ON DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 201.24

201.24 Obligations of municipalities, political subdivisions, and agencies of the state.—There shall be exempt from all taxes imposed by this chapter:

(1) Any obligation to pay money issued by a municipality, political subdivision, or agency of the state.

(2) Any assignment, transfer, or other disposition, or any document, which arises out of a rental, lease, or lease-purchase for real property agreement entered pursuant to s. 1013.15(2) or (4).

History.—s. 10, ch. 79-350; s. 2, ch. 88-119; s. 29, ch. 95-269; s. 2, ch. 98-264; s. 913, ch. 2002-387.

F.S. 201.24 on Google Scholar

F.S. 201.24 on Casetext

Amendments to 201.24

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 201.24

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 201.24.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE SALDANA,, 531 B.R. 141 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Exemptions that he was seeking to exempt more than 200 acres of land (60 acres plus 141.24 acres equals 201.24 . . .

PRUETT, v. W. COLVIN,, 85 F. Supp. 3d 1152 (N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . full range of sedentary work, a finding of “not disabled” would be directed by Medical-Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .

L. BROWN, v. W. COLVIN,, 47 F. Supp. 3d 180 (W.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Applying Rule 201.24 of the Grids, the ALJ determined that plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 863 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (N.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . The cost to students in the course would have been $201.24 [Jt. Ex. 5 at D-39]. . . . The amount earned would have been $201.24, the amount charged by CCC, [Jt. . . .

SAWYER, v. J. ASTRUE,, 775 F. Supp. 2d 829 (E.D.N.C. 2011)

. . . sedentary work and that she was, therefore, not disabled using Medical-Vocational Rules 201.18 and 201.24 . . . Sawyer was not disabled using Medical-Vocational Rules 201.18 and 201.24 (Tr. p. 25.) . . .

LEMKE, v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,, 380 F. App'x 599 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . had a limited education; given this description, it is clear that the ALJ intended to reference Rule 201.24 . . . P, App. 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.24. . . .

L. MORSEMAN, v. J. ASTRUE,, 571 F. Supp. 2d 390 (W.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . his work experience (heavy to very heavy and unskilled work), the ALJ applied Medical Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .

M. GIVENS, v. J. ASTRUE,, 251 F. App'x 561 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . P, App. 2, rule 201.24 (the grids) as a framework, the ALJ concluded that Ms. . . .

JONES, v. J. ASTRUE,, 570 F. Supp. 2d 708 (E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . educational background and work experience, Sections 404.1569 and 416.969, and Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .

STACKHOUSE, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 435 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2006)

. . . that her testimony about her limitations was only partially credible; that under Medical-Vocation Rule 201.24 . . .

BECKLES, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 340 F. Supp. 2d 285 (E.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . functional capacity to perform sedentary work, age, education, and work experience, Medical-Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .

CARUSO, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 99 F. App'x 376 (3d Cir. 2004)

. . . Applying Medical-Vocational Rule 201.24 set forth at 20 C.F.R. . . .

YNOCENCIO, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 300 F. Supp. 2d 646 (N.D. Ill. 2004)

. . . acquisition and transferability to be immaterial to the outcome, the ALJ applied Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .

HENSLEY, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 352 F.3d 353 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . Whether this ease is considered under rule 201.23 (“Illiterate”) or rule 201.24 (limited education), . . . P, App. 2, Tbl. 1, Rules 201.23-201.24. . . .

CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 857 So. 2d 904 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 201.24(1), Florida Statutes (2000), exempts obligations to pay money issued by a Florida municipality . . . Finally, Section 201.24(2), Florida Statutes (2000), exempts transactions involving lease or rental of . . .

HENSLEY, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 334 F.3d 768 (8th Cir. 2003)

. . . determined that he possessed at least a limited education, the ALJ then analyzed Hensley’s claim under Rule 201.24 . . . P., App. 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24 (2002). . . . In the first instance, Rules 201.23 and 201.24 both reference § 201(h), which, in the “sedentary work . . .

TORRES, Sr. v. G. MASSANARI,, 204 F. Supp. 2d 466 (E.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Based on these findings, the ALJ applied Medical Vocational Rule 201.24 and found that it directed a . . .

BARRIENTOZ v. G. MASSANARI,, 202 F. Supp. 2d 577 (W.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16 and Rules 201.18 and 201.24 . . . do not allow him to perform the full range of sedentary work, using the above-cited Rules 201.18 and 201.24 . . .

J. CASTREJON, v. S. APFEL,, 131 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (E.D. Wis. 2001)

. . . perform her past physical work, and at step five, relying on the testimony of VE Schroeder and using Rule 201.24 . . .

TOLBERT, v. S. APFEL,, 106 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (N.D. Okla. 2000)

. . . The ALJ then denied benefits at step five of the sequential evaluation process by applying grid rule 201.24 . . .

AGUIAR, v. S. APFEL,, 99 F. Supp. 2d 130 (D. Mass. 2000)

. . . The testimony of the VE, along with the regulatory framework in Rule 201.24 of the Medical/Vocational . . .

D. BRADY v. S. APFEL,, 41 F. Supp. 2d 659 (E.D. Tex. 1999)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, §§ 201.23, 201.24, 201.25, 201.26, 201.27, 201.28. . . .

R. RHODES, v. S. APFEL,, 40 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (E.D. Mo. 1999)

. . . relevant work experience and residual functional capacity, the ALJ found that the Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .

L. ARENSMAN, v. F. APFEL,, 40 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (D. Kan. 1999)

. . . and the claimant’s age, education and work experience, Section 404.1569 of Regulation No. 4, and Rule 201.24 . . .

J. RICHARDSON, v. S. APFEL,, 9 F. Supp. 2d 666 (N.D. Tex. 1998)

. . . residual functional capacity allowing for the full range of sedentary work, Medical-Vocational Rules 201.24 . . .

LISTLE v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY, 138 F.3d 1155 (7th Cir. 1998)

. . . Resolution 94-801(a)(d); General Ordinance § 201.24(4.26). . . . Moreover, I find that the classification in General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) between employees . . .

V. TAYLOR, v. J. CALLAHAN,, 969 F. Supp. 664 (D. Kan. 1997)

. . . work and claimant [sic] age, education and work experience Section 404.1569 and the framework of Rule 201.24 . . .

LENZ v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY, a, 961 F. Supp. 1268 (E.D. Wis. 1997)

. . . a)(d), which approved the early retirement incentive package through amendment of General Ordinance 201.24 . . . The amendment added Section 201.24(4.26) which limited the eligibility for the early retirement incentive . . . The resolution also provided that the terms of General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) would take effect . . . Moreover, I find that the classification in General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) between employees . . . I have already concluded that the classification created under General Ordinance Section 201.24(4.26) . . .

QUINLAN, v. S. CHATER,, 966 F. Supp. 854 (E.D. Mo. 1997)

. . . plaintiff is 42 years of age, a younger individual; that she has a limited education; and that under Rules 201.24 . . . Thus, the ALJ properly applied Rules 201.24 and 201.25 of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines to find that . . .

HINKLE SSN XXX- XX- XXXX v. J. CALLAHAN, Ph. D., 963 F. Supp. 1533 (W.D. Mo. 1997)

. . . vocational expert is consistent with the conclusion reachable under the framework of Vocational Rule 201.24 . . .

GERCKE, v. S. CHATER,, 907 F. Supp. 51 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . Gereke not to be disabled pursuant to rule 201.24 of the Grids. 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. . . .

MANNS, v. E. SHALALA,, 888 F. Supp. 470 (W.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . P, Appendix 2, §§ 201.23, 201.24 (1994). . . .

W. BURNETT, v. E. SHALALA,, 883 F. Supp. 565 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . claimant’s age, education and work experience, Section 404.1569 and the framework of Rules 202.17 and 201.24 . . .

M. O CONNOR, v. E. SHALALA,, 873 F. Supp. 1482 (D. Kan. 1995)

. . . claimant’s age, education, and work experience, Section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16 and using Rule 201.24 . . .

C. WAGNER v. FAIR ACRES GERIATRIC CENTER, 859 F. Supp. 776 (E.D. Pa. 1994)

. . . .” § 201.24(c) . "... we do not mind an infrequent episodic agitation. . . .

REED, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 988 F.2d 812 (8th Cir. 1993)

. . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.24 (1992). . . .

S. THOMPSON, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 987 F.2d 1482 (10th Cir. 1993)

. . . P, App. 2, Rule 201.24. Decision of Administrative Law Judge, R. Vol. I at 10-11. Ms. . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, v. A. DUDA SONS, INC., 608 So. 2d 881 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . It provides in pertinent part: Unless exempt under s. 201.24 or under any state or federal law, if the . . . Duda also construes the phrase “unless exempt under section 201.24 or under any state or federal law” . . . Duda does not contend that the deeds are exempt under the provisions of section 201.24, which relate . . .

W. NARCISSE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 794 F. Supp. 194 (W.D. La. 1992)

. . . .-969 of Regulations No. 4 and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations No. 4, . . .

B. PEARSON, S. S. XXX- XX- XXXX v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 780 F. Supp. 682 (E.D. Cal. 1991)

. . . retained the residual functional capacity to perform the full range of sedentary work, and applying Rules 201.24 . . .

W. ABBOTT, v. M. SULLIVAN, M. D., 905 F.2d 918 (6th Cir. 1990)

. . . The AU also indicated that rule 201.24, contained in the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, 20 C.F.R. . . . The most closely applicable rule is 201.24 which applies to individuals whose education is "limited or . . .

TRENTINI, v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D., 733 F. Supp. 35 (W.D. Pa. 1989)

. . . Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.24. . . .

KOVACEVICH, v. W. SULLIVAN,, 725 F. Supp. 990 (N.D. Ind. 1989)

. . . Section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . .

WILLIAMS, v. SULLIVAN,, 717 F. Supp. 639 (N.D. Ill. 1989)

. . . Even if the claimant were limited to sedentary work, Rules 201.19, 201.20, 201.24 and 201.25 would direct . . . 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and section 416.969 of Regulations No. 16, and Rules 201.19, 201.20, 201.24 . . .

CRUSE, v. R. BOWEN,, 867 F.2d 1183 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . Part 404, Sub-part P, Appendix 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24, indicate that Cruse was not disabled. . . .

HANSLEY, v. R. BOWEN,, 708 F. Supp. 724 (E.D.N.C. 1989)

. . . Applying the grids to these facts, the AU concluded that claimant was not disabled under Rules 201.24 . . . capacity to perform the full range of sedentary work thus indicating no disability on the basis of Rules 201.24 . . .

JOHNSON v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 699 F. Supp. 475 (E.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . Thus, under § 404.1569 of Regulation 4 and § 416.969 of Regulation 16, and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1, . . .

HOLLADAY, v. BOWEN,, 848 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . Rule 201.24 in the Grids provides that (1) a younger individual (age 18-44), (2) with a limited education . . .

McROBERTS, v. BOWEN,, 841 F.2d 1077 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . In this case, the AU applied grid rules 201.24-201.26 to determine the existence of jobs in the national . . .

NUNN, v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 828 F.2d 1140 (6th Cir. 1987)

. . . P, app. 2, Table No. 1, Rules 201.24 and 201.25. . . .

R. HURT, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 816 F.2d 1141 (6th Cir. 1987)

. . . sedentary work and then applied the grids (20 C.F.R., Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rules 201.24 . . .

R. KELLAM v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 663 F. Supp. 238 (E.D. Pa. 1987)

. . . the full range of sedentary work”; and finally that “section 416.969 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.24 . . .

C. HALE, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 816 F.2d 1078 (6th Cir. 1987)

. . . P, App. 2, Rules 201.24 and 201.25, the AU concluded that plaintiff is not disabled. . . .

ARTRIP, v. R. BOWEN,, 651 F. Supp. 376 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . See 20 C.F.R. 404, Subpt.P.App. 2, Rule 201.24 and 201.25. . . .

W. MOON, v. R. BOWEN, M. D., 810 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1987)

. . . The AU then found that medical — vocational rule 201.24, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, Subp. . . . Medical-vocational rule 201.24, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, subp. P, App. 2 (1986). . . .

A. PYSHER, v. M. HECKLER,, 640 F. Supp. 837 (E.D. Pa. 1986)

. . . P, App. 2, sec. 201.00(a), (b), (c), (h) and rule 201.24. . . .

L. JOHNSON, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 794 F.2d 1106 (6th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 404.1569 and Rule 201.24, Table 1, App. 2, Subp. P. I. . . .

DARNELL DARNELL, v. R. BOWEN, 631 F. Supp. 96 (W.D. Va. 1986)

. . . capacity to perform a restricted range of medium, light and sedentary work, using Rules 203.25, 202.17 and 201.24 . . .

TRUNDLE, v. HECKLER,, 626 F. Supp. 272 (D.S.D. 1986)

. . . Section 416.969 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulations . . .

RODRIGUEZ, v. M. HECKLER,, 621 F. Supp. 194 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . He applied Rules 201.18 and 201.24, which direct a finding of “not disabled” if the claimant is a younger . . . Subpart P, App. 2, §§ 201.18 and 201.24. . . .

LAWLER, v. M. HECKLER,, 761 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. 1985)

. . . inadequate personality, she would still be found “not disabled” under the framework of Rules 202.17 and 201.24 . . .

L. BROCK, v. M. HECKLER,, 612 F. Supp. 1348 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . . § 404.1569 and the grids found in Appendix 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24, the AU determined that the plaintiff . . . of sedentary work, the Secretary properly applied 20 C.F.R. § 404.1569 and Appendix 2, Table 1, Rule 201.24 . . .

A. HOLLOWAY, v. HECKLER,, 607 F. Supp. 71 (D. Kan. 1985)

. . . Considering in addition her age and level of education, under Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2 . . .

BAZEMORE, v. HECKLER,, 595 F. Supp. 682 (D. Del. 1984)

. . . pain was not based upon substantial evidence; and second, that the AU’s excessive reliance on rules 201.24 . . . Section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.24 and 201.25 Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart . . . Based on the above, the ALJ determined that 20 C.F.R. 404.1569 and Rules 201.24 and 201.25 of the grid . . .

MARTINEZ, Jr. v. M. HECKLER,, 735 F.2d 795 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . Martinez argues the AU misapplied Rules 201.23, 201.24 and 201.25 of Appendix 2. . . . Rule 201.24 cannot apply because of the literacy requirement. . . .

M. BELDEN, v. HECKLER,, 586 F. Supp. 628 (N.D. Ind. 1984)

. . . Section 404.1569 of Regulations No. 4 and Rules 201.23 and 201.24 of Table No. 1, Appendix 2, Subpart . . .

RILEY, v. HECKLER,, 585 F. Supp. 278 (S.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . Rules 201.24, 201.25, App. 2, Reg. No. 16, Sub-part I (tr. 15-16). . . . Rules 201.24-201.26, App. 2, Reg. No. 16, Subpart I. . . .

DE PAULA, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 580 F. Supp. 1580 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

. . . See §§ 201.23 and 201.24, Appendix 2, Subpart P, Regulation No. 4. . . .

PEREZ, v. H. HECKLER,, 581 F. Supp. 1095 (N.D. Ind. 1984)

. . . The industrial blindness threshold is 20/200. . 20 C.F.R., Subpart P, App. 2 § 200.00(c); Rule 201.24 . . .

R. FYFFE, v. M. HECKLER,, 580 F. Supp. 310 (D. Ariz. 1984)

. . . The AU applied Rule 201.24 of the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, 20 C.F.R. . . .

MAKOVICS, v. SCHWEIKER,, 577 F. Supp. 1287 (D. Del. 1983)

. . . Upon application of the grid regulations, specifically Rules 201.26 and 201.24, the ALJ concluded that . . .

BROWN v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 562 F. Supp. 284 (E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . capacity to engage in sedentary work and after applying the criteria set forth in 20 C.F.R. app. 2 § 201.24 . . .

G. GRANT, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 699 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1983)

. . . in the military was discounted, the grid would still direct a finding of “Not disabled” under Rule 201.24 . . .

MELENDEZ, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 550 F. Supp. 1294 (D. Mass. 1982)

. . . Part 404, Subpart P, App. 2, Rule 201.24. . . . Subparts P and I, App. 2, Table No. 1, Rule 201.24. . . .

BARBOSA, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 549 F. Supp. 773 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)

. . . capacity the claimant was not disabled under Social Security Regulations §§ 404.1569 and 416.969 and Rules 201.24 . . . Sub-part P, Appendix 2, Table No. 1, Rules 201.24, 201.25, 201.26. . . .

ROSA, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES,, 547 F. Supp. 712 (D. Mass. 1982)

. . . In fact, the ALJ stated: “Rule 201.24 of Table No. 1 is appropriate and mandates [emphasis added] that . . .

LOMBARDO, v. SCHWEIKER,, 546 F. Supp. 875 (N.D. Ill. 1982)

. . . Based on this conclusion, the ALJ found plaintiff not disabled, citing Rule 201.24 of the medical vocational . . . Subpart P, Appendix 2, Rule 201.24. . . .

R. COLLINS, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 544 F. Supp. 154 (W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . Applying this RFC along with plaintiff’s age, education and experience, the ALJ determined that Rule 201.24 . . . Unfortunately, the footnote to Rule 201.24 expressly provides that the Grid should not be applied in . . .

SINGLETON v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 551 F. Supp. 715 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . perform sedentary work, his age, education and work experience and applying all these factors to Rule 201.24 . . .

P. SHERWIN, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 685 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1982)

. . . Consequently, the Grid directs a finding of “not disabled,” Grid, Rule 201.24; it would do so even were . . .

R. SPENCER, Sr. a v. A. LEWIS,, 416 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . sale amounted to state action and is thus exempt from documentary stamp taxes under Florida Statute § 201.24 . . . Florida Statute § 201.24 exempts any obligations to pay money issued by a municipality, political subdivision . . .

L. DAVIS, v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 536 F. Supp. 90 (N.D. Cal. 1982)

. . . Having made these findings, the AU held that Rule 201.24, 20 C.F.R. § 404, Subpart P, Appendix 2, Table . . . Thus, because these findings correspond to the criteria of Rule 201.24, the Guidelines direct a conclusion . . .

ROBERTS, v. SCHWEIKER,, 667 F.2d 1143 (4th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 404.1513 (1980) (medical-vocational guidelines) and Rule 201.24, Table No. 1 of Appendix 2, Subpart . . . further administrative proceedings in the Secretary’s use of the new 1979 regulations, specifically Rule 201.24 . . .

P. SMITH v. S. SCHWEIKER,, 520 F. Supp. 27 (D.N.H. 1981)

. . . The ALJ determined that Regulation 404.1513 and Rule 201.24 of Table No. 1 of Appendix 2 to Subpart P . . . The ALJ found the plaintiff capable of sedentary work, a criteria of both Rule 201.24 and 201.21 of table . . .

In ALLIED DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, S. EISENBERG, v. G. FLATEN,, 435 F.2d 372 (7th Cir. 1970)

. . . Apparently to avoid a provision of the Wisconsin statutes (§ 201.24), which prohibits a domestic insurance . . .

UNITED STATES BIO- GENICS CORP. v. K. CHRISTENBERRY,, 173 F. Supp. 645 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

. . . . § 201.24(h) (1952); Columbia Research Corp. v. Schaffer, supra, note 4, 256 F.2d at page 679. . . . .

COLUMBIA RESEARCH CORPORATION v. H. SCHAFFER,, 256 F.2d 677 (2d Cir. 1958)

. . . Section 201.24 allowed either party to appeal to the Solicitor for the Post Office Department, who was . . .

De SYLVA v. BALLENTINE, GUARDIAN, 351 U.S. 570 (U.S. 1956)

. . . Globe, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. 2680, 2854 (1870). 37 CFR, 1938, §201.24 (a): “Application for the renewal . . .