Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 202.25 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 202.25 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 202.25

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 202
COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TAX SIMPLIFICATION LAW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 202.25
202.25 Jurisdiction; dealers not qualified to do business in this state.—
(1) All suits brought by the department against any dealer for any violation of this chapter for the purpose of collecting any tax due from the dealer, including garnishment proceedings, regardless of the amount, must be brought in the circuit court of this state having jurisdiction of the subject matter.
(2) Each dealer who is not qualified to do business in this state shall designate with the department an agent within this state for service of process to enforce this chapter. If a dealer fails to designate such an agent, the Secretary of State or any agent or employee of the dealer within this state constitutes the agent for the service of such process.
History.—ss. 17, 58, ch. 2000-260; s. 38, ch. 2001-140.

F.S. 202.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 202.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 202.25


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 202.25
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 202.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 202.25

Total Results: 4

Campbell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-15

Citation: 819 So. 2d 197, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6602, 2002 WL 985453

Snippet: called for a sentence ranging from 121.35 months, to 202.25 months. He entered guilty pleas to all of the charged

Lamb v. Ralston Purina Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1945-03-02

Citation: 21 So. 2d 127, 155 Fla. 638, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 605

Snippet: 259, 195 So. 295; Holden v. Stratton,198 U.S. 202, 25 S.Ct. 656, 49 L.Ed. 1018; Hogan v. Hall, (C.C.A

Gosma v. Adams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-06-30

Citation: 135 So. 806, 102 Fla. 305

Snippet: 195, 35 A. 967, 1103, 36 A. 359, 35 L. R. A. 202; 25 R. C. L. par. 254, Statutes p. 1015; Commercial

State ex rel. Kennerly v. Amos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-12-08

Citation: 78 Fla. 552, 83 So. 393, 1919 Fla. LEXIS 525

Snippet: 40 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23, November 10, 1919; 3 Fla. 202; 25 Fla. 298; 61 Fla. 233. Affirmed. Ellis and West