Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 206.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 206.05 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 206.05

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 206
MOTOR AND OTHER FUEL TAXES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 206.05
206.05 Bond required of licensed terminal supplier, importer, exporter, or wholesaler.
(1) Each terminal supplier, importer, exporter, or wholesaler, except a municipality, county, school board, state agency, federal agency, or special district which is licensed under this part, shall file with the department a bond in a penal sum of not more than $300,000, such sum to be approximately 3 times the combined average monthly tax levied under this part and local option tax on motor fuel paid or due during the preceding 12 calendar months under the laws of this state. An exporter shall file a bond in an amount equal to 3 times the average monthly tax due on gallons acquired for export. The bond shall be in such form as may be approved by the department, executed by a surety company duly licensed to do business under the laws of the state as surety thereon, and conditioned upon the prompt filing of true reports and the payment to the department of any and all fuel taxes levied under this chapter including local option taxes which are now or which hereafter may be levied or imposed, together with any and all penalties and interest thereon, and generally upon faithful compliance with the provisions of the fuel tax and local option tax laws of the state. The licensee shall be the principal obligor, and the state shall be the obligee. An assigned time deposit or irrevocable letter of credit may be accepted in lieu of a surety bond.
(2) In the event that liability upon the bond thus filed with the department is discharged or reduced, whether by judgment rendered, payment made, or otherwise, or if in the opinion of the department any surety on the bond theretofore given has become unsatisfactory or unacceptable, then the department may require a new bond with satisfactory sureties in the same amount, failing which the department shall forthwith cancel the license. If such new bond is furnished as above provided, the department shall cancel and surrender the bond of the person for which such new bond is substituted.
(3) In the event that the department decides that the amount of the existing bond is insufficient to ensure payment to the state of the amount of the tax and any penalties and interest for which the person is or may at any time become liable, then that person shall forthwith, upon the written demand of the department, file additional bond in the same manner and form with like security thereon as hereinbefore provided, and the department shall forthwith cancel the license of anyone failing to file an additional bond as herein provided.
(4) Any surety on any bond furnished by a person, as above provided, shall be released and discharged from any and all liability to the state accruing on such bond after the expiration of 60 days from the date upon which such surety has filed with the department written request to be released and discharged. However, such request shall not operate to relieve, release, or discharge such surety from any liability already accrued, or which shall accrue, before the expiration of the 60-day period. The department shall, promptly on receipt of notice of such request, notify the licensee who furnished the bond, and, unless the licensee on or before the expiration of the 60-day period files with the department a new bond with a surety company satisfactory to the department in the amount and form hereinbefore in this section provided, the department shall forthwith cancel the license. If the new bond is furnished as above provided, the department shall cancel and surrender the bond of the licensee for which the new bond is provided.
History.s. 3, ch. 16082, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 1167(64); s. 1, ch. 57-78; s. 7, ch. 63-253; s. 1, ch. 63-299; s. 5, ch. 65-371; s. 2, ch. 65-420; ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-995; s. 3, ch. 77-149; s. 54, ch. 78-95; s. 9, ch. 83-3; s. 1, ch. 83-137; s. 1, ch. 83-138; s. 83, ch. 85-342; s. 73, ch. 87-99; s. 1, ch. 92-184; s. 7, ch. 95-417; s. 14, ch. 2020-10.
Note.Former s. 207.06.

F.S. 206.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 206.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 206.05


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 206.05
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 206.05.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 206.05

Total Results: 8

Baptist Medical Center of the Beaches, Inc. v. Rhodin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-16

Citation: 40 So. 3d 112, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10454, 2010 WL 2795380

Snippet: disciplining authority of that medical expert." § 766.206(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). Continuing with our review

Barclay v. Susac

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-12-29

Citation: 780 So. 2d 152, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16925, 2000 WL 1879102

Snippet: Inc., 659 So.2d 249 (Fla.1995). . Section 766.206(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), provides in pertinent

Cohen v. Dauphinee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-04-15

Citation: 739 So. 2d 68, 1999 WL 236248

Snippet: reasonable investigation requirements. Section 766.206(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), requires a court to

Faber v. Wrobel

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-12-06

Citation: 673 So. 2d 871, 1995 WL 715489

Snippet: court shall dismiss the claim...." [2] Section 766.206(5)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), permits the court

Duffy v. Brooker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-01-21

Citation: 614 So. 2d 539, 1993 WL 8994

Snippet: whether he made any investigation). See § 766.206(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). He did not consider significant

Stebilla v. Mussallem

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-02-14

Citation: 595 So. 2d 136, 1992 WL 24470

Snippet: [3] Merriam Webster Dictionary. [4] Section 766.206(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1991) provides: If the court

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1986-07-31

Snippet: respectively ss. 266.06(5); 266.106(5); 266.115(5); 266.206(5); 266.306(5); 266.406(5) and 266.506(5), F.S. Moreover

Standard Oil Company v. Gay

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-02-12

Citation: 118 So. 2d 212

Snippet: Division, Maule Industries, Fla. 1960, 118 So.2d 206. [5] Cf. Caranci v. Miami Glass & Engineering Co.