206.10
Reports to be filed whether taxes due or not.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
206.10 Reports to be filed whether taxes due or not.—All statements or reports required by part I or part II of this chapter and the fuel tax laws of this state to be made to the department monthly shall be filed each month, regardless of whether or not a fuel tax is due under the provisions of the laws of Florida.
History.—s. 17, ch. 16082, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 1167(78); s. 7, ch. 63-253; s. 5, ch. 65-371; s. 2, ch. 65-420; ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-995; s. 91, ch. 81-259; s. 19, ch. 95-417.
Note.—Former s. 207.14.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1974–1988 · leading case: Poole v. Endsley
Poole v. Endsley (1974)
“45 CFR, § 206.10 (a) (6). 3 *1382 4. An unborn child is not a child within the meaning of the Social Security Act, Title 42, U.”
Williams v. DEPT. OF HRS (1988)
“Finding, however, that HRS failed to comply with the provisions of section 206.10(a)(2)(i) of the federal regulations, which "require that applicants shall be fully informed of eligibility requirements so they may change their circumstances sufficiently to comply with such…”
Buckley v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. (1987)
“The provisions of section 206.10(a)(2)(i) require that applicants shall be fully informed of eligibility requirements so they may change their circumstances sufficiently to comply with such requirements.”
Buckley v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services (1987)
“Although HRS contends that appellant was not informed of these rights because its case worker dealing with appellant was not aware that the six-month grace period was an available option, we conclude that the duty to inform in section 206.10(a)(2)(i) is not fulfilled and its…”
— 206.10(a) — 1 case
Poole v. Endsley (1974)
“45 CFR, § 206.10 (a) (6). 3 *1382 4. An unborn child is not a child within the meaning of the Social Security Act, Title 42, U.”
— 206.10(a)(2)(i) — 3 cases
Williams v. DEPT. OF HRS (1988)
“Finding, however, that HRS failed to comply with the provisions of section 206.10(a)(2)(i) of the federal regulations, which "require that applicants shall be fully informed of eligibility requirements so they may change their circumstances sufficiently to comply with such…”
Buckley v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. (1987)
“The provisions of section 206.10(a)(2)(i) require that applicants shall be fully informed of eligibility requirements so they may change their circumstances sufficiently to comply with such requirements.”
Buckley v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services (1987)
“Although HRS contends that appellant was not informed of these rights because its case worker dealing with appellant was not aware that the six-month grace period was an available option, we conclude that the duty to inform in section 206.10(a)(2)(i) is not fulfilled and its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.