Florida Statute 206.93 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 206
MOTOR AND OTHER FUEL TAXES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 206.93

206.93 Penalty for failure to report and pay taxes promptly.—If any person willfully fails to file the report and pay the tax as provided in s. 206.91, the department shall revoke the person’s license unless it appears that the failure to comply with this part was not due to fraud or to an intent to violate this part.

History.—s. 9, ch. 19446, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 1167(111); s. 10, ch. 26718, 1951; s. 7, ch. 63-253; s. 3, ch. 63-512; s. 5, ch. 65-371; s. 2, ch. 65-420; ss. 21, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 70-995; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 54, ch. 78-95; s. 16, ch. 89-356; s. 1087, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 209.09.

F.S. 206.93 on Google Scholar

F.S. 206.93 on Casetext

Amendments to 206.93

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 206.93

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 206.93.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 206.93

Total Results: 20

O'MALLEY v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-12-16

Citation: 257 So. 2d 9

Snippet: Compare State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667; State ex rel. Landis v. Harris, 120 Fla

Haslett v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-07-09

Citation: 225 So. 2d 186, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408

Snippet: directs. State ex rel. Buford v. Spencer, [84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667] supra.” We now advert back to the specific

Matthews v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-11-27

Citation: 99 So. 2d 568

Snippet: State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 1922, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667; Ex parte Smith, 1930, 100 Fla. 1, 128

Cates v. Heffernan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-05-09

Citation: 18 So. 2d 11, 154 Fla. 422, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 724

Snippet: and State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667, are also instructive. The fact that Chapter

State Ex Rel. Ellars v. Board of County Commissioners

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-05-27

Citation: 3 So. 2d 360, 147 Fla. 278, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1276

Snippet: 165; State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667; Stateex rel. Loftin v. McMillan, 55 Fla

State Ex Rel. Blalock v. Lee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-03-14

Citation: 1 So. 2d 193, 146 Fla. 385

Snippet: 804; State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667; Anderson v. Board of Public Instruction

Waybright v. Duval County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-05-10

Citation: 196 So. 430, 142 Fla. 875, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1474

Snippet: local one. Stateex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 South. Rep. 667; State ex rel. Buford v. Daniel

State Ex Rel. Coleman v. York

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-07-18

Citation: 190 So. 599, 139 Fla. 300

Snippet: 282; State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard,84 Fla. 206, 93 South. Rep. 677; State ex rel. Gray v. Stoutamire

The Sivort Co. v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-01-27

Citation: 186 So. 671, 136 Fla. 179, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1535

Snippet: State. See State, ex rel., v. Sheppard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667. The Act must be held void, for the reasons

State Ex Rel. Baker v. Gray

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-07-01

Citation: 182 So. 620, 133 Fla. 23

Snippet: of Florida, ex rel. Buford, v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 668, we held: "In providing that `the Legislature

State Ex Rel. White v. Foley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-05-26

Citation: 182 So. 195, 132 Fla. 595

Snippet: See State, ex rel. Buford, v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So.2d 667, and Flood v. State, ex rel. Board of

County of Manatee v. Davidson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-03-29

Citation: 181 So. 889, 132 Fla. 295, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1747

Snippet: classification." *Page 298 "In State v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So.2d 667; State v. Watkins, 88 Fla. 392, 102 So

State Ex Rel. Richardson v. Ferrell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-11-06

Citation: 177 So. 181, 130 Fla. 26

Snippet: operate. State, ex rel. Buford, v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206,93 South. Rep. 667. "Chapter 9274 is not a `special

State Ex Rel. Harrell v. Cone

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1937-10-06

Citation: 177 So. 854, 130 Fla. 158

Snippet: TERRELL, it was said: "In State v. Sheppard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. 667; State v. Watkins, 88 Fla. 392, 102 So

Latham v. Hawkins

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-10-29

Citation: 163 So. 709, 121 Fla. 324, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1573

Snippet: throughout the State. In State v. Sheppard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So.2d 667; State v. Watkins, 88 Fla. 392, 102 So

Brooks v. Miami Bank & Trust Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-09-24

Citation: 156 So. 757, 116 Fla. 589, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1115

Snippet: 422, 100 S.E. Rep. 375; Tillman v. Davis,147 Ga. 206, 93 S.E. Rep. 201. Although in Ballin Company v. Ferst

State Ex Rel. Landis v. Harris

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-06-11

Citation: 163 So. 237, 120 Fla. 555

Snippet: 334; State, ex rel. Buford, v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206,93 So.2d 667; Jordan v. State, ex rel., 100 Fla. 494

State Ex Rel. Landis v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-11-15

Citation: 151 So. 284, 112 Fla. 734

Snippet: 804; State ex rel. Buford v. Shephard, 84 Fla. 206,93 So. 667. See also Beasley v. Cahoon, 147 So.2d

Flood v. State Ex Rel. Bd. Co. Comr's.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-06-24

Citation: 129 So. 861, 100 Fla. 70

Snippet: 634; State ex rel. Buford v. Shepard, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. R. 667; State ex rel. Buford v. Watkins, 88

Ex Parte Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-06-14

Citation: 128 So. 864, 100 Fla. 1, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 913

Snippet: 340, 70 So. R. 367; State v. Shepherd, 84 Fla. 206, 93 So. R. 667. If, however, the affected proviso is