Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 210.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 210.14 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 210.14

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 210
TAX ON TOBACCO PRODUCTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 210.14
210.14 Warrant for collection of taxes.
(1) In addition to all other remedies for the collection of any taxes due under the provisions of this part, the division may issue a warrant under its official seal, which warrant may be filed by the division in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of any county where the delinquent taxpayer owns property. Upon presentation of the warrant, the clerk of the circuit court shall enter it in the judgment docket. The name of the person mentioned in the warrant, the amount of the tax and penalties for which the warrant was issued, and the date such copy was filed shall be included in the record of the warrant. The clerk shall be allowed the same fees as are allowed by law for similar services rendered in judgment execution proceedings. The warrant issued by the division may then be directed to the sheriff of any county commanding that sheriff to levy upon and sell the goods and chattels of the specified delinquent person found within the sheriff’s jurisdiction, for the payment of the amount of such delinquency plus a penalty equal to 50 percent of the amount thereof, and interest on the total at 1 percent per month and the cost of executing the warrant, and to return such warrant to the division and to pay it the money collected by virtue thereof within 60 days after receipt of such warrant.
(2) The amount of the warrant docketed pursuant to subsection (1) shall become a lien upon the title to or the interest in real or personal property of the person against whom the warrant is issued. The sheriff to whom any such warrant is directed shall proceed upon the warrant in all respects and with like effect and in the same manner as prescribed by law in respect to executions issued against goods and chattels upon judgments by a court of record, and the sheriff shall be entitled to the same fees for his or her services in executing the warrant to be collected in the same manner.
(3) In the discretion of the division, a warrant of like terms, force, and effect may be issued and directed to any officer or employee of the division; and in the execution thereof such officer or employee shall have all the power conferred by law upon sheriffs, but shall be entitled to no fee or compensation in excess of the actual expenses paid in the performance of such duty. If a warrant is returned not satisfied in full, the division may from time to time issue new warrants and shall also have the same remedies to enforce the amount due thereunder as if the state had recovered judgment therefor and execution thereon had been returned satisfied.
History.s. 13, ch. 21946, 1943; s. 14, ch. 22645, 1945; s. 1, ch. 26320, 1949; s. 6, ch. 29884, 1955; ss. 16, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 8, ch. 76-261; s. 11, ch. 79-11; s. 9, ch. 82-118; s. 11, ch. 87-86; s. 1098, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 210.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 210.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 210.14


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 210.14
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 210.14.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 210.14

Total Results: 10

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification and Regulation of Spoken Language Court Interpreters - Revised Opinion

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-03-31T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: qualifying in accordance with rules 14.205, 14.210, and 14.215. Rule 14.205. Certified Court Interpreter

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFICATION AND REGULATION OF SPOKEN LANGUAGE COURT INTERPRETERS

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-03-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 159 So. 3d 804, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 445, 2015 WL 919790

Snippet: qualifying in accordance with rules 14.205,14.210, and 14.215. Rule 14.205. Certified Court Interpreter

Hamlet v. Hamlet

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-08-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 552 So. 2d 210, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2042, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4845, 1989 WL 99702

Snippet: Cobb, Dauksch, Sharp 31 August 1989 552 So. 2d 210, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2042, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4845,

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1979-02-26T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: the division pursuant to ss.210.02(6), 210.12(3), 210.14, and 210.18(4)(a), F. S.; and all collections (…manners prescribed in ss. 210.02(6), 210.12(3), 210.14, and210.18(4)(a), F. S. Prepared by: Edwin J. Stacker

Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-07-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 252 So. 2d 1

Snippet: , Usury, § 54. In Mackey v. Thompson, 153 Fla. 210, 14 So.2d 571 (1943), relied upon by the District Court

Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-07-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 239 So. 2d 88, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5724

Snippet: authority of Mackey v. Thompson, 1943, 153 Fla. 210, 14 So.2d 571 and Yaffee v. International Company,

American National Growers Corporation v. Harris

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-04-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 120 So. 2d 212

Snippet: Procedure, 30 F.S.A. See Mackey v. Thompson, 153 Fla. 210, 14 So.2d 571, as to pleading usury. The essential

Shaffran v. Holness

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-03-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 102 So. 2d 35

Snippet: other defenses." Mackey v. Thompson, 153 Fla. 210, 14 So.2d 571, 573. In Jones v. Hammock, 131 Fla. 321

Yaffee v. International Company

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1955-06-01T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 80 So. 2d 910

Snippet: . 399, 77 So. 88; Mackey v. Thompson, 153 Fla. 210, 14 So.2d 571; Chakford v. Sturm, Fla., 65 So.2d 864

Chakford v. Sturm

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1953-06-05T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 65 So. 2d 864

Snippet: 136 So. 439, and Mackey v. Thompson, 153 Fla. 210, 14 So.2d 571 are relied on to support this contention