Florida Statute 213.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 213
STATE REVENUE LAWS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 213.35

213.35 Books and records.—Each person required by law to perform any act in the administration of any tax enumerated in s. 72.011 shall keep suitable books and records relating to that tax, such as invoices, bills of lading, and other pertinent records and papers, and shall preserve such books and records until expiration of the time within which the department may make an assessment with respect to that tax pursuant to s. 95.091(3).

History.—s. 6, ch. 88-119.

F.S. 213.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 213.35 on Casetext

Amendments to 213.35

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 213.35

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 213.35.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 213.35

Total Results: 20

Thomas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-04-28

Citation: 599 So. 2d 158

Snippet: time on appeal. Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656 (1903); Cross v. Aby, 55 Fla. 311, 45 So

Maddry v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-08-08

Citation: 585 So. 2d 359, 1991 WL 151966

Snippet: time on appeal. See Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656 (1903); Lineberger v. Domino Canning Co

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gifford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-20

Citation: 473 So. 2d 220, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1539, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15142

Snippet: injury protection benefits, and Amica paid out $20,213.35 pursuant to the New York no-fault law for claims

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gifford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-07-21

Citation: 434 So. 2d 1015

Snippet: severely injured and his insurer, Amica, paid out $20,213.35 under the personal injury protection endorsement

Tabasky v. Dreyfuss

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-10-04

Citation: 350 So. 2d 520

Snippet: time on appeal. See Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656 (1903); Lineberger v. Domino Canning Co

Roseman v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-04-03

Citation: 293 So. 2d 64, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4191

Snippet: presumption of consent. Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656; Markey v. State, 47 Fla. 38, 37 So. 53;

Adkins v. Burdeshaw

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-03-11

Citation: 220 So. 2d 39, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6009

Snippet: So. 402 (1930); Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656 (1903); and Walton v. Walton, 181 So.2d

Alter v. Finesmith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-10-15

Citation: 214 So. 2d 732

Snippet: 35 So. 4 (1903); Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656 (1903). Of course this rule does not apply

Abrahams v. Mimosa Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-04-20

Citation: 174 So. 2d 82, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4535

Snippet: construed. See: Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656; Florida Land Rock Phosphate Company v

Chaudoin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-02-19

Citation: 118 So. 2d 569

Snippet: time on appeal. Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656. However, in considering appellant's contention

Connelly v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-11-07

Citation: 97 So. 2d 865

Snippet: the one conveyed. Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656; Martin v. Kitchen, 195 Mo. 477, 93 S.W

Stewart v. Mack

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1956-03-16

Citation: 86 So. 2d 143

Snippet: 341, 50 So. 576; Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656; 30 F.S.A. Supreme Court Rules, 1955, Rule

Hall v. Holland

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1950-10-06

Citation: 47 So. 2d 889, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 1102

Snippet: dangerous conditions, Restatement of Torts, Section 213; 35 Am.Jur., page 612; Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering

Holloman v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-09-15

Citation: 191 So. 36, 140 Fla. 59, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1052

Snippet: 128 Sou. Rep. 402; Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213,35 Sou. Rep. 656; Parker v. Dekle, 46 Fla. 452,35

Vogel v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-05-28

Citation: 168 So. 539, 124 Fla. 409, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1135

Snippet: 954,128 So. 402; Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 So. 656; Parker v. Dekle, 46 Fla. 452, 35 So. 4;

McKenna v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-12-28

Citation: 161 So. 561, 119 Fla. 576, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1962

Snippet: 128 Sou. Rep. 402; Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 Sou. Rep. 566; Parker v. Dekle, 46 Fla. 452, 35

Blake v. City of Tampa

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-04-27

Citation: 156 So. 97, 115 Fla. 348, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1595

Snippet: appellant. City of Louisville v. Leatherman, 99 Ky. 213; 35 S.W. Rep. 625; Wilson v. Board of Education of

Jarvis v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-04-19

Citation: 156 So. 310, 115 Fla. 320, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1590

Snippet: Call, 1 Fla. 92; Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 South. Rep. 656; Akin v. Morgan, 50 Fla. 173, 39

American Surety Co. v. Hayden

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-09-21

Citation: 150 So. 114, 112 Fla. 17, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2164

Snippet: fundamental error. Hoodless v. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213,35 So. 656; A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. Dees, 56 Fla. 137

White v. Crandall

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-11-13

Citation: 143 So. 871, 105 Fla. 70, 137 So. 272

Snippet: 4, 46 Fla. 452; Hoodless vs. Jernigan, 46 Fla. 213, 35 Sou. Rep. 656; Lovett vs. Lovett, 93 Fla. 611,