Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 215.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 215.07 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 215.07

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 215.07
215.07 Preference of state in case of insolvency.When any revenue officer or other person now indebted or hereafter becoming indebted to the state, by bond or otherwise, shall become insolvent, or when the estate of any deceased debtor in the hands of executors or administrators shall not be sufficient to pay all the debt due from the deceased, the debt due to the state shall be first satisfied; and the priority established shall be deemed to extend as well to cases in which a debtor, not having sufficient property to pay all his or her debts, shall make a voluntary assignment thereof, or in which the estate and effects of an absconding, concealed or absent debtor shall be attached by process of law, as to cases in which the party shall be insolvent.
History.s. 5, Feb. 10, 1832; RS 410; GS 602; RGS 1037; CGL 1348; s. 1139, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 215.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.07


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.07
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.07.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 215.07

Total Results: 20

M.N., P.N. v. Agency for Persons With Disabilities

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-04T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: construction apply to rule 65G–4.0215(7)(a). According to rule 65G–4.0215(7)(a): When a client …particular, Florida Administrative Code Rule 65G–4.0215(7)(a)—and the principle of administrative finality… on its internal policy interpreting rule 65G–4.0215(7)(a), once M.N. disenrolled, he was required to …hearing officer, rather than interpreting rule 4.0215(7)(a) without giving deference to ADP’s interpretation…administrative finality. As such, pursuant to rule 65G–4.0215(7)(a), ADP was required to place M.N. back on the

ALBERTO YORDANO CORREDOR v. GEORGE NICHOLS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-07-06T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: fees for Burlington’s work in the amount of $30,215.07. The trial court however, entered final judgment

The Fallstaff Group, Inc., Etc. v. Mpa Brickell Key, LLC, Etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-08-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 143 So. 3d 1139, 2014 WL 3844021, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040

Snippet: property and, thereafter, demanded from MPA “$43,-215.07 (the amount paid by [FBEC] to MPA), plus $7,593.56

MPA Brickell Key, LLC v. Fallstaff Group, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-07-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 92 So. 3d 879, 2012 WL 2813873, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11105

Snippet: . FBEC, through counsel, demanded from MPA “$43,215.07 (the amount paid by [FBEC] to MPA), plus $7,593.56

Amendments to the Rules of Juvenile Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-10-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 783 So. 2d 138, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 924, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2041, 2000 WL 1587805

Snippet: This rule corresponds to section 39tQ44(-7-)985.215(7), Florida Statutes, which requires detained children…proceeding that is referred to in section 39.044(-7-)985.215(7), Florida Statutes. RULE 8.085. PREHEARING MOTIONS

State Contracting v. Dept. of Transp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-04-09T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 709 So. 2d 607

Snippet: well. Gilbert's bid was the lowest, at $9,153,215.07, and State Contracting's bid was the second

John Deere Insurance Co. v. State, Department of Insurance

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-01-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 463 So. 2d 385, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 239, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14102

Snippet: contention concerns that provision in Section 627.-215(7), Florida Statutes (1981), which requires that excessive

Swann v. Mitchell

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1983-07-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 435 So. 2d 797

Snippet: Revenue laws. In Francklyn v. Sprague, 121 U.S. 215, 7 S.Ct. 951, 30 L.Ed. 936 (1887), the United States

Glaab v. Caudill

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 236 So. 2d 180

Snippet: and Myers v. Korbly (Fla.App.2d 1958), 103 So.2d 215. [7] See, Myers v. Korbly, id. See, also, 3 Fla.Jur

Steele v. Steele

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-08-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 177 So. 2d 873

Snippet: the test laid down in Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215, 7 So. 864; Hancock v. Hancock, 55 Fla. 680, 45 So

Taylor v. Board of Public Instruction of Duval County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-06-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 131 So. 2d 504

Snippet: Department v. Shell, Fla. App. 1960, 122 So.2d 215. [7] Rich v. Harper Neon Company, Fla. App. 1960,

Lentz v. Lentz

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-05-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 120 So. 2d 815, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2567

Snippet: Fla. 1196, 125 So. 694; Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215, 7 So. 864; Beekman v. Beekman, 53 Fla. 858, 43 So

Masilotti v. Masilotti

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1942-03-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 7 So. 2d 132, 150 Fla. 86, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 932

Snippet: Fla. 1196, 125 So. 694; Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215, 7 So. 864; Beekman v. Beekman, 53 Fla. 858, 43 So

Windham v. Windham

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1940-10-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 198 So. 202, 144 Fla. 563, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1094

Snippet: Fla. 1196,125 So. 694; Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215, 7 So. 864; Beekman v. Beekman, 53 Fla. 858, 43 So

Henderson v. Henderson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1939-05-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 189 So. 24, 137 Fla. 770, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1907

Snippet: rule was announced in Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215,7 South. Rep. 864, that one could not prevail on this

Currie v. Currie

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1935-06-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 162 So. 152, 120 Fla. 28, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1335

Snippet: 324, 2 So.2d Rep. 768; Palmer v. Palmer,26 Fla. 215; 7 So.2d Rep. 864; Wetherington v. Wetherington, supra

Welch v. Welch

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1933-11-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 152 So. 173, 112 Fla. 590, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2311

Snippet: 551, 49 Sou. Rep. 549; Palmer v. Palmer,26 Fla. 215, 7 Sou. Rep. 864; Beekman v. Beekman, 53 Fla. 858,

Baker v. Baker

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1927-12-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 114 So. 661, 94 Fla. 1001

Snippet: Fla. 324, 2 So. 768; Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215, 7 So. 864; Wethington v. Wethington, 57 Fla. 551,

Kellogg v. Kellogg

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1927-02-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 93 Fla. 261, 111 So. 637

Snippet: a violent temper. In Palmer v. Palmer, 25 Fla. 215, 7 So. 864, it was held: “Nor will divorce on the

Kellogg v. Kellogg

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1927-02-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 93 Fla. 263, 111 So. 892

Snippet: a violent temper. In Palmer v. Palmer, 25 Fla. 215, 7 So. 864, it was held: "Nor will divorce on