The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 215.20). Section 6912 of Title 7 of the United States Code provides: . . . .
. . . . § 215.20). . . .
. . . . § 215.20. Id. . . .
. . . Section 215.20(b) of the regulations exempts decisions of the Secretary and Under Secretary (together . . . judge in the Eastern District of California granted nationwide injunctive relief with respect to §§ 215.20 . . . The district court granted TWS’s motion for summary judgment and declared §§ 215.20(b) and 215.12(f) . . . Although its challenges to §§ 215.20(b) and 215.13(a) are not tied to a particular project or application . . . As a preliminary matter, the Forest Service urges us to reject any standing argument based on the § 215.20 . . .
. . . . § 215.20(b). The Appeal Rule also places restrictions on who may comment and who may appeal. . . .
. . . decisions and actions that have been categorically excluded from documentation in an EA or EIS”), and 215.20 . . .
. . . . § 215.20. . . . appeal procedures decisions that have been excluded from documentation in an EIS or EA); 36 C.F.R. § 215.20 . . .
. . . . § 215.20 provides that “unless waived in a specific case, it is the position of the Department of Agriculture . . .
. . . . § 215.20 advises that “unless waived in a specific case, it is the position of the Department of Agriculture . . .
. . . . § 215.20. . . .
. . . All moneys received by the department pursuant to this chapter, less the deductions required by s. 215.20 . . .
. . . . § 215.20 (1999). . . .
. . . . § 215.20. . . .
. . . All moneys received by the department pursuant to this chapter, less the deductions required by s. 215.20 . . .
. . . . § 215.20 (1999). . . .
. . . . § 215.20 (requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies); Bastele v. Federal Crop Ins. . . .
. . . . § 215.20 advises that “unless waived in a specific case, it is the position of the Department of Agriculture . . .
. . . . § 215.20. . . . Therein, Judge Standish concludes that 7 U.S.C. § 6912(e) and 36 C.F.R. § 215.20 clearly mandate exhaustion . . .
. . . . § 215.20 (1993). . . . See 36 C.F.R. § 215.20 (1997). See also, 36 C.F.R. §§ 215.7, 215.11— 215.19 (1997). . . .
. . . . § 215.20. . . . See 12 C.F.R. § 215.20. . . .
. . . . § 215.20 (1994). . . .
. . . The present dispute began when DOR retained the section 215.20(1), Florida Statutes (1983), service charge . . .
. . . commercial real estate located in North Richland Hills, Texas (the “Premises”), at a monthly rate of $23,-215.20 . . .
. . . Jarnison-Harris Bid Prices equals Appreciation Per MBF DF $171.00 $110.00 $61.00 PP 133.30 116.70 16.60 SP 215.20 . . .
. . . Section 215.20(1), Florida Statutes (1983) provides in part: A service charge of 6 percent, representing . . . Appellee brought suit for declaratory judgment, asserting that the application of Sections 215.20 and . . .
. . . thereof, shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund in lieu of the service charge provided for in § 215.20 . . . consider the effect of section 601.15(7)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), but instead construed sections 215.20 . . .
. . . Penal Law § 195.05 (obstructing governmental administration); § 215.20 (bribe receiving by a juror); . . . or § 215.20 (misconduct by a juror) (McKinney 1975). . . . See § 215.20. . . .
. . . The $17,715.20 figure includes both the $16,-215.20 at issue in the indictment and a further sum that . . .
. . . . §§ 215.10-215.20 (1979). . 42 U.S.C. .§ 3535(d) (1976). . 12 U.S.C. § 1701q(b) incorporating § 1749a . . .
. . . . § 215.20. . 24 C.F.R. § 215.45(a). . . . .
. . . See Pfaender’s affidavit, p. 2; 24 CFR 215.20(b), 215.25 and 215.45; HUD Handbook 4520.1, paragraphs . . . and dividend payments, and such other income items as the Secretary considers appropriate.” 24 CFR 215.20 . . .
. . . . § 215.20(4)(iv). . . . Other deductions for limited purposes are allowable. 24 C.F.R. § 215.20(a)(1)(b); § 215.45(a) (b). . . . See 12 U.S.C. § 1701s (c) (2) (D) ; 24 C.F.R. § 215.20(4) (iv). . Mrs. . . .
. . . Mallory & Sons withheld and paid in 1943 $215.20 and in 1944 $165.20. 5. . . .
. . . 143.54 Oct. 1-31, 1932, incl... 408,000 317.60 205.50 112.10 Nov. 1-30, 1932, incl.. 427,400 331.18 215.20 . . .
. . . damages in the superior court, and in the supreme court, upon the appeal from the judgment, amount to $215.20 . . . that unless petitioners, within 20 days from this date, pay to the said William Silveira the sum of $215.20 . . .