Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 215.65 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 215.65 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 215.65

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 215.65
215.65 Bond Fee Trust Fund, expenditures; schedule of fees.
(1) There is created a Bond Fee Trust Fund, which shall be maintained as a separate fund. The working capital reserve of this fund for any fiscal year shall never exceed the expenditures of the previous fiscal year. The “working capital reserve” is defined as the amount of cash, investments at cost, and accounts receivable due within 1 year, less the amount of accounts payable due within 1 year, at the end of the current fiscal year. Any moneys in excess of the working capital reserve which remain in the fund at the end of the fiscal year shall be transferred by the division within 120 days to the sinking fund accounts established for the bonds issued by the division during such prior fiscal year and shall be distributed to such accounts on a pro rata basis according to the fees charged for the issuance of such bonds.
(2) All expenses of the division may be paid from such trust fund. Such expenses shall include, but shall not be limited to, costs of validating, printing and delivering the bonds, printing the prospectus, publishing notices of sale of the bonds, salaries of personnel of the division, and necessary administrative expenses.
(3) The division shall adopt by resolution a schedule of fees and expenses, which may be revised from time to time as conditions warrant, designed so that the Bond Fee Trust Fund will be reimbursed for general administrative expenses of the division as well as all direct out-of-pocket expenses. The fees charged to and all expenses paid for and on behalf of each bond issue shall be paid and reimbursed to the Bond Fee Trust Fund from the proceeds of the sale of the bonds, if such bonds are sold, or from such other source as may be agreed to by the state agency requesting the services of the division, if for any reason the bonds are not sold.
History.s. 10, ch. 69-230; s. 48, ch. 71-355; s. 1, ch. 73-135; s. 37, ch. 81-223; s. 80, ch. 83-217; s. 6, ch. 89-287; s. 2, ch. 93-162.

F.S. 215.65 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.65 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.65


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.65
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.65.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 215.65

Total Results: 5

Vantage View, Inc. v. Bali East Development Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-11-10

Citation: 421 So. 2d 728, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22082

Snippet: v. Goldhouse Restaurants, Inc. Fla., 96 So.2d 215, 65 ALR 2d 637; Savage, v. Rowell Distributing Corp

Dave Hess, Inc. v. Black Angus of Pompano, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-01-18

Citation: 288 So. 2d 286, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8175

Snippet: v. Gold House Restaurants, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 215, 65 ALR 2d 637. It appears from the record that appellant

Cooper v. Carroll

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-09-29

Citation: 239 So. 2d 511

Snippet: v. Gold House Restaurants, Fla. 1957, 96 So.2d 215, 65 A.L.R.2d 637; Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American

Sapp v. Redding

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-09-09

Citation: 178 So. 2d 204

Snippet: Crump v. Gold House Restaurant, Inc., 96 So.2d 215, 65 A.L.R.2d 637 (1957), that Rule 1.35, which provides

Scott v. Permacrete, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-12-01

Citation: 124 So. 2d 887

Snippet: v. Gold House Restaurants, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 215, 65 A.L.R.2d 637; Harvey Aluminum, Inc. v. American