Florida Statute 215.76 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 215
FINANCIAL MATTERS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 215.76

215.76 Exemption of bonds from taxation.—

(1) As the exercise of the powers conferred by this act constitutes the performance of essential public functions, all properties, revenues, or other assets of the division or of any state agency on behalf of which bonds are issued under this act, and all bonds issued hereunder and the interest thereon, shall be exempt from all taxation by the state or any county, municipality, political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality of the state. The exemption granted by this section is not applicable to any tax imposed by chapter 220 on interest, income, or profits on debt obligations owned by corporations.

(2) Each governmental agency for which the division issues bonds shall have the responsibility for the life of all bonds outstanding to assure continued compliance with the provisions of the federal Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder relating to maintaining the tax-exempt status of such bonds; provided, however, that the division shall be responsible for ensuring that all provisions of federal arbitrage laws are complied with regarding such bonds. Each governmental agency for which the division has issued bonds and each state agency shall be subject to the direction of the division to the extent necessary to ensure such compliance.

History.—s. 21, ch. 69-230; s. 6, ch. 73-327; s. 4, ch. 84-171; s. 8, ch. 89-287.

F.S. 215.76 on Google Scholar

F.S. 215.76 on Casetext

Amendments to 215.76

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 215.76

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 215.76.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 215.76

Total Results: 12

Nical of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Lewis

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-03-19T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 981 So. 2d 502

Snippet: 30, 2005, to August 17, 2006, in the amount of $215,076.94.[1] A review of the trial court's order

Florida Bar v. Newhouse

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-03-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 539 So. 2d 473, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 101, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 142, 1989 WL 21079

Snippet: $3,422.10 Grady Wimberly $1,125.81 Elliott Scott $ 215.76 Mario Gulinello $ 712.54 Angela Simmons $2,055.57

Dept. of Revenue v. First Union Nat. Bk.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1987-09-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 513 So. 2d 114

Snippet: Sections 125.019, 159.15, 159.31, 159.50, 183.14, 215.76, 243.33, 315.11, 340.20, 348.122, 348.65, 348.762… debt obligations owed by corporations." § 215.76, Fla. Stat. (1985). Therefore, we need not decide

Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Rouse

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1967-01-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 194 So. 2d 260

Snippet: 568, 23 So.2d 843. [3] Ellis v. State, 74 Fla. 215, 76 So. 698; Carlton, for Use of Duval County v. Fidelity

Randi v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-02-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 182 So. 2d 632, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5937

Snippet: DONALD IC, JL, concur. . Ellis v. State, 74 Fla. 215, 76 So. 698. No. G-288 District Court of

Mott v. Cochran

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1960-01-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 117 So. 2d 408

Snippet: Antonacci, Fla., 62 So.2d 5; Ellis v. State, 74 Fla. 215, 76 So. 698; Townsend v. Beck, 140 Fla. 553, 192 So

Matthews v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1957-11-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 99 So. 2d 568

Snippet: time on appeal. Cf. Ellis v. State, 1917, 74 Fla. 215, 76 So. 698, where, however, the court declined to

Findley v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-06-01T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 168 So. 544, 124 Fla. 447, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1141

Snippet: alleged in the indictment. Ellis v. State,74 Fla. 215, 76 So. 698; Thalheim v. State, 38 Fla. 169, 20 So.

Forrest Lake v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1930-07-29T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 129 So. 827, 100 Fla. 373, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1000

Snippet: Fla. 46, 34 So. R. 287; Ellis v. State, 74 Fla. 215, 76 So. R. 698. It is unnecessary to repeat here the

Whitman v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1929-05-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 122 So. 567, 97 Fla. 988

Snippet: Fla. 572, 73 So. R. 740; Ellis v. State, 74 Fla. 215, 76 So. R. 698; Steffanos v. State, 80 Fla. 309, 86

Jackson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1924-03-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 87 Fla. 262, 99 So. 548

Snippet: 572, 73 South. Rep. 740; Ellis v. State, 74 Fla. 215, 76 South. Rep. 698; Kirkland v. State, 86 Fla. 64,

Rast v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1920-05-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 79 Fla. 772, 84 So. 683

Snippet: 46, 34 South. Rep. 287; Ellis v. State, 74 Fla. 215, 76 South. Rep. 698. It is unnecessary to repeat here