Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 216.151 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 216.151 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 216.151

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE
Chapter 216
PLANNING AND BUDGETING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 216.151
216.151 Duties of the Executive Office of the Governor.It shall be the duty of the Executive Office of the Governor to:
(1) Make a detailed study, as necessary, of each of the several state agencies, with a view toward ascertaining and determining the needs thereof; whether changes should be made in existing organizations, their activities and methods of operation; what appropriation should be made therefor; whether the operations and activities of different agencies or within the same agencies should be combined, consolidated, or integrated or should be regrouped and rearranged, all to the end of securing greater economy without sacrificing efficiency in the operations of such agencies. In order to accomplish this type of study, the Executive Office of the Governor may request any or all agencies to submit a budget plan with respect to targets established by the Governor. Such a request shall not influence the agencies’ independent judgments in making legislative budget requests, as required by law.
(2) Prepare an analysis of the legislative budget requests submitted by state agencies and the judicial branch covering their respective operational and fixed capital outlay requirements.
(3) Prepare such other data as will reflect the financial condition of the state and its agencies at the close of the prior fiscal year and an estimate of what that condition will be at the close of the current fiscal year.
(4) Prepare a statement of policy to assure that fixed capital outlay appropriations recommended by the Governor will be consistent with recommended operational standards related to programs and utilization.
(5) Provide to the Legislature any information used to justify and evaluate the Governor’s recommended balanced budget.
(6) Consult with the Office of State-Federal Relations in Washington, D.C., under the Executive Office of the Governor, in order to:
(a) Evaluate current levels of federal authorization to determine how the state might obtain a more equitable share of federal funding.
(b) Develop a federal-aid formula database in order to catalog all existing federal formulas and identify funding inequities.
(c) Establish a federal formula modeling capability, to the extent allowable by resources. Such a modeling component should be designed in a manner which assists the state and its federal representatives in assessing periodic legislation before Congress which disseminates financial assistance to state and local governments based on a formula or set of formulas.
(d) Develop and implement a communications network to link the Legislature and the executive branch with Florida’s Congressional Delegation. Such a network should allow for the rapid transmittal of:
1. Data on restructuring formula-based legislation.
2. Information on block grants and the impact of periodic proposals related thereto.
3. Information relating to federal mandate issues.
4. Data pertaining to other matters associated with federally derived funds which have an impact upon the state.

The express intent of the endeavors enumerated in this subsection shall be to secure a more equitable share of available federal revenues.

(7) Perform such other duties as may be required by law or by the Governor.
History.s. 31, ch. 69-106; s. 11, ch. 71-354; s. 3, ch. 75-243; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 10, ch. 80-45; s. 5, ch. 89-51; s. 53, ch. 92-142; s. 4, ch. 95-303.

F.S. 216.151 on Google Scholar

F.S. 216.151 on Casetext

Amendments to 216.151


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 216.151
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 216.151.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 216.151

Total Results: 8

Whiley v. Scott

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-08-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 79 So. 3d 702, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 451, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1900, 2011 WL 3568804

Snippet: are specifically identified un*706der section 216.151, Florida Statutes (2010), and those duties pertain

Martinez v. Florida Legislature

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-03-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 542 So. 2d 358

Snippet: legislative budget requests for the governor, § 216.151, who, 45 days before the session begins in odd-

Dade County Land Development Corp. v. Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-11-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 157 So. 2d 142

Snippet: 350, 123 So. 745; Devane v. Leatherman, 113 Fla. 216, 151 So. 530; Ranger Realty Co. v. Hefty, 112 Fla.

Adams v. Fielding

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1941-11-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 4 So. 2d 678, 148 Fla. 552

Snippet: 645, 152 So. 439; Devane v. Leatherman, 113 Fla. 216, 151 So. 530; City of Ft. Myers v. Heitman (now pending

City of Fort Myers v. Heitman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1941-11-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 4 So. 2d 871, 148 Fla. 432

Snippet: 145, 194 So. 324; Devane v. Leatherman, 113 Fla. 216, 151 So. 530. The tax in this case is not wholly illegal

Coombes v. City of Coral Gables

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-05-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 168 So. 524, 124 Fla. 374, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1133

Snippet: 654, 152 So. 439; DeVane v. Leatherman,113 Fla. 216, 151 So. 530; City of Sebring v. Wolf, 105 Fla. 516,141

Draughon v. Heitman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1936-02-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 168 So. 838, 124 Fla. 24, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1061

Snippet: 408, 159 So. 808; Devane v. Leatherman, 113 Fla. 216,151 So. 530; Hackney v. McKenney, 113 Fla. 176, 151

Abrogast Land Co. v. Philcox

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1934-12-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 157 So. 891, 122 Fla. 539, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1968

Snippet: 546, and DeVane,et al., v. Leatherman, 113 Fla. 216, 151 So. 530. It is so ordered. Affirmed. WHITFIELD