Florida Statute 216.222 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 216
PLANNING AND BUDGETING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 216.222

216.222 Budget Stabilization Fund; criteria for withdrawing moneys.—

(1) Moneys in the Budget Stabilization Fund may be transferred to the General Revenue Fund for:

(a)1. Offsetting a deficit in the General Revenue Fund. A deficit is deemed to occur when the official estimate of funds available in the General Revenue Fund for a fiscal year falls below the total amount appropriated from the General Revenue Fund for that fiscal year. Such a transfer must be made pursuant to s. 216.221, or pursuant to an appropriation by law.

2. Notwithstanding the requirements of s. 216.221, if, after consultation with the Revenue Estimating Conference, the Chief Financial Officer believes that a deficit will occur in the General Revenue Fund and if:

a. Fewer than 30 but more than 4 days are left in the fiscal year, the Legislature is not in session, and neither the Legislature nor the Legislative Budget Commission is scheduled to meet before the end of the fiscal year, or

b. Fewer than 5 days are left in the fiscal year and the Governor and the Chief Justice, the Legislature, or the Legislative Budget Commission have not implemented measures to resolve the deficit,

the Chief Financial Officer shall certify the deficit to the Governor, the Chief Justice, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and may thereafter withdraw funds from the Budget Stabilization Fund to offset the projected deficit in the General Revenue Fund. The Chief Financial Officer shall consult with the Governor and the chair and vice chair of the Legislative Budget Commission before any funds may be withdrawn from the Budget Stabilization Fund. At the beginning of the next fiscal year, the Chief Financial Officer shall promptly determine the General Revenue Fund balance to be carried forward. The Chief Financial Officer shall immediately repay the Budget Stabilization Fund for the withdrawn amount, up to the amount of the balance. If the General Revenue Fund balance carried forward is not sufficient to fully repay the Budget Stabilization Fund, the repayment of the remainder of the withdrawn funds shall be as provided in s. 215.32(2)(c)3.

(b) Providing funding for an emergency as defined in s. 252.34. The emergency must have been declared by the Governor pursuant to s. 252.36 or declared by law. Such a transfer must be made pursuant to s. 252.37, subject to the conditions in that section, or pursuant to an appropriation by law.

(2)(a) Moneys in the Budget Stabilization Fund may be transferred to the State Risk Management Trust Fund to provide funding for an emergency. For purposes of this subsection, an emergency exists when uninsured losses to state property exceed $2 million per occurrence or $5 million annual aggregate, as this constitutes an unanticipated financial need that the Legislature has found must be funded to serve an essential state responsibility.

(b) At such time that the Division of Risk Management certifies that uninsured property losses exceed $2 million per occurrence or $5 million annual aggregate, the division shall request a budget amendment through the procedures set out in s. 216.181. Transfers into the State Risk Management Trust Fund pursuant to this paragraph may not exceed $38 million in any fiscal year.

History.—s. 1, ch. 94-250; s. 1, ch. 2001-376; s. 243, ch. 2003-261; s. 1, ch. 2004-239.

F.S. 216.222 on Google Scholar

F.S. 216.222 on Casetext

Amendments to 216.222

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 216.222

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 216.222.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 216.222

Total Results: 7

Maxwell v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-10

Snippet: liberty.”); cf. Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 222 (1932) (“The question, then, in the case of the

Jermaine Foster v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-28

Citation: 260 So. 3d 174

Snippet: at 14; see also Hitchcock v. State, 226 So. 3d 216, 222-23 (Fla.), cert. denied 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017)

Pinkney Carter v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-02

Citation: 175 So. 3d 761, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 404, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1434

Snippet: ”); Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 222-23 (Fla.1998) (concluding that counsel reasonably

Bradley v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-04-22

Citation: 33 So. 3d 664, 2010 WL 26522

Snippet: damaging testimony."); Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 222-23 (Fla.1998) (concluding that counsel reasonably

Stein v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-25

Citation: 995 So. 2d 329, 2008 WL 4346490

Snippet: 2527; see, e.g., Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 222-26 (Fla.1998) (holding that where defendant presented

Davis v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-05

Citation: 990 So. 2d 459, 2008 WL 2277520

Snippet: defendant. See, e.g., Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 222-23 (Fla.1998). After a careful review of the record

Hertz v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-22

Citation: 941 So. 2d 1031, 2006 WL 1699504

Snippet: mitigation, see Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 222 n. 3 (Fla. 1998), the scientific underpinnings