Florida Statute 218.73 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 218
FINANCIAL MATTERS PERTAINING TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 218.73

218.73 Timely payment for nonconstruction services.—The time at which payment is due for a purchase other than construction services by a local governmental entity must be calculated from:

(1) The date on which a proper invoice is received by the chief disbursement officer of the local governmental entity after approval by the governing body, if required; or

(2) If a proper invoice is not received by the local governmental entity, the date:

(a) On which delivery of personal property is accepted by the local governmental entity;

(b) On which services are completed;

(d) On which the local governmental entity and vendor agree in a contract that provides dates relative to payment periods;

whichever date is latest.

History.—s. 4, ch. 89-297; s. 2, ch. 95-331; s. 2, ch. 2001-169.

F.S. 218.73 on Google Scholar

F.S. 218.73 on Casetext

Amendments to 218.73

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 218.73

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 218.73.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 218.73

Total Results: 4

Myers v. Brook

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-02-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 708 So. 2d 607, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1868, 1998 WL 80460

Snippet: 1991 he obtained a judgment in the amount of $115,-218.73, plus interest. Bredlau’s effort to collect his

State v. En

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-09-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 455 So. 2d 636

Snippet: States v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 344 U.S. 218, 73 S.Ct. 227, 97 L.Ed. 260 (1952); United States v

State v. E.N.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-09-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 455 So. 2d 636, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1934, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14976

Snippet: States v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp., 344 U.S. 218, 73 S.Ct. 227, 97 L.Ed. 260 (1952); United States v

Young v. Charnack

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1974-06-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 295 So. 2d 665

Snippet: Corporation of America v. Marks, 1937, 10 Cal.2d 218, 73 P.2d 1215; 46 Am.Jur. Judgments, § 904; Freeman